Response rates to anonymous versus confidential surveys

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 85, Issue 3 PART I, 1997, Pages 665-666

  Groves, Bruce W ^a   Price, James H ^a   Olsson, Roy H ^a   King, Keith A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642584560     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.2.665     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. RIDDICK, C. C., DESCHRIVER, M., & WEISSINGER, G. (1984) A methodological review of research in the Journal of Leisure Research from 1978 to 1982. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 311-321.
2. YAMMARINO, F. J., SKINNER, S. J., & CHILDERS, T. L. (1991) Understanding mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 613-639.
3. ARMSTRONG, J. S., & LUSK, E. J. (1987) Return postage in mail surveys: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 233-248.
4. DODD, D. D., BOWELL, P. L., & LITWIN, W. J. (1988) Survey response rate as a function of number of signatures, signature ink color, and postscript on covering letters. Psychological Reports, 63, 358.
5. FOX, R. J., CRASK, M. R., & KIM, J. (1988) Mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for including responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 467-491.
6. RAMSDELL, L. B. (1995) Maximizing response rates in questionnaire research. American Journal of Health Behavior, 20, 50-56.
7. ROSZKOWSKI, M. J. (1990) Believe it or not: longer questionnaires have lower response rates. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 495-505.
8. ROBERSON, M. T., & SUNDSTROM, E. (1990) Questionnaire design, return rates, and response favorableness in an employee attitude questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 354-357.
9. MANGIONE, T. W. (1995) Mail surveys-improving the quality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 65-66.