-
1
-
-
0037024223
-
Poor quality medical research. What can journals do?
-
Altman DG. Poor quality medical research. What can journals do? J Am Med Assoc 2002;287:2765-2767.
-
(2002)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.287
, pp. 2765-2767
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
-
2
-
-
9444255722
-
Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
-
Begg CB, Cho MK, Eastwood S et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:637-639.
-
(1996)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.276
, pp. 637-639
-
-
Begg, C.B.1
Cho, M.K.2
Eastwood, S.3
-
3
-
-
0035857966
-
The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised controlled trials
-
Woher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-1194.
-
(2001)
Lancet
, vol.357
, pp. 1191-1194
-
-
Woher, D.1
Schulz, K.F.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
4
-
-
85047692188
-
Empirical evidence of bias:dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
-
Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias:dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc 1995;273:408-412.
-
(1995)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.273
, pp. 408-412
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Chalmers, I.2
Hayes, R.J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
5
-
-
0032558314
-
Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of interventions efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
-
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al. Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of interventions efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998;352:609-613.
-
(1998)
Lancet
, vol.352
, pp. 609-613
-
-
Moher, D.1
Pham, B.2
Jones, A.3
-
7
-
-
0029817351
-
Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
-
Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Brit Med J 1996;313:570-571.
-
(1996)
Brit Med J
, vol.313
, pp. 570-571
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
-
8
-
-
0030909098
-
The quest for unbiased research: Randomised clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines
-
Schulz KF. The quest for unbiased research: randomised clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines. Ann Neurol 1997;41:569-573.
-
(1997)
Ann Neurol
, vol.41
, pp. 569-573
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
-
9
-
-
0030292293
-
CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement
-
Huston P, Hoey J. CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement. Can Med Assoc J 1996;155:1277-1279.
-
(1996)
Can Med Assoc J
, vol.155
, pp. 1277-1279
-
-
Huston, P.1
Hoey, J.2
-
10
-
-
0036347588
-
The reporting of methodological factors in randomised controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist
-
Devereaux PJ, Manns BJ, Ghali WA et al. The reporting of methodological factors in randomised controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Contr Clin Trials 2002;23:380-388.
-
(2002)
Contr Clin Trials
, vol.23
, pp. 380-388
-
-
Devereaux, P.J.1
Manns, B.J.2
Ghali, W.A.3
-
11
-
-
0035901579
-
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: Explanation and elaboration
-
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:663-694.
-
(2001)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.134
, pp. 663-694
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
Schulz, K.F.2
Moher, D.3
|