|
|
Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 513-520
|
|
Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgments of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: a pilot study.
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CARDIOLOGY;
CLASSIFICATION;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT;
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE;
CULTURAL FACTOR;
DEMOGRAPHY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
NETHERLANDS;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
SPAIN;
STANDARD;
SWEDEN;
SWITZERLAND;
THORAX SURGERY;
TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
CARDIOLOGY;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS;
CORONARY DISEASE;
CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HEALTH SERVICES MISUSE;
HUMANS;
NETHERLANDS;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS;
SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;
SPAIN;
SWEDEN;
SWITZERLAND;
THORACIC SURGERY;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
|
|
EID: 0035348147
PISSN: 00257079
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00011 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (26)
|
|
References (0)
|
