Quark dipole operators in extended technicolor models

Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics

Volumn 595, Issue 1-4, 2004, Pages 442-452

  Appelquist, Thomas ^a   Piai, Maurizio ^a   Shrock, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

12.60.Nz; 14.60.PQ; 14.60.St

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DIPOLE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR PHYSICS; PREDICTION;

EID: 3843070801     PISSN: 03702693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.066     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind Nucl. Phys. B 155 1979 237
2. E. Eichten and K. Lane Phys. Lett. B 90 1980 125
3. T. Appelquist and J. Terning Phys. Rev. D 50 1994 2116
4. T. Appelquist and R. Shrock Phys. Lett. B 548 2002 204
5. T. Appelquist and R. Shrock M. Harada Y. Kikukawa K. Yamawaki Strong Coupling Gauge Theories and Effective Field Theories 2003 World Scientific Singapore 266
6. T. Appelquist and R. Shrock Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 2003 201801
7. T. Appelquist, M. Piai and R. Shrock Phys. Rev. D 69 2004 015002 We note a misprint in this reference: Eq. (4.34) should read M 13 ( u ) ≃ κ Λ TC 2 Λ 3 / Λ 1 2
8. T. Appelquist, M. Piai and R. Shrock hep-ph/0401114 Phys. Lett. B, submitted for publication
9. B. Holdom Phys. Lett. B 150 1985 301
10. K. Yamawaki, M. Bando and K. Matumoto Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 1986 1335
11. T. Appelquist, D. Karabali and L.C.R. Wijewardhana Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 1986 957
12. T. Appelquist and L.C.R. Wijewardhana Phys. Rev. D 35 1987 774
13. T. Appelquist, N. Christensen, M. Piai, R. Shrock, in preparation
14. For recent discussions of CP violation in the ETC context, see K. Lane hep-ph/0106328
15. K. Lane hep-ph/0202255
16. See, e.g., the reviews A. Buras hep-ph/9806471
17. M. Neubert hep-ph/9809377
18. G. Isidori hep-ph/0401079 and references therein to the extensive literature
19. A recent experimental review is M. Nakao Proceedings of the Lepton-Photon Symposium 2003 hep-ex/0312041
20. F. Parodi C. Kalman Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Hyperons, Charm, and Beauty Hadrons Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 115 2003 212
21. M. Battaglia hep-ph/0304132
22. M. Ciuchini hep-ph/0307195
23. cb*) = ρ̄ + iη̄, these fits give ρ̄ = 0.18 ± 0.05 and η̄ = 0.34 ± 0.03
24. K. Abe Belle Collaboration hep-ex/0308038
25. B. Aubert BaBar Collaboration hep-ex/0403035
26. J. Soares Nucl. Phys. B 367 1991 575
27. A. Kagan Phys. Rev. D 51 1995 6196
28. A. Kagan and M. Neubert Phys. Rev. D 58 1998 094012
29. See http://pdg.lbl.gov (limits are 90% CL)
30. See, e.g. S. Bertolini, M. Fabbrichesi and J.O. Eeg Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 2000 65
31. Some reviews of EDM's are W. Bernreuther and M. Suzuki Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 1991 1463
32. S. Barr Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8 1993 209
33. I. Khriplovich and S. Lamoreaux CP Violation without Strangeness 1997 Springer New York
34. Some recent reviews of experimental searches for neutron and atomic EDM's are J. Pendlebury and E. Hinds Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 440 2000 471
35. E.N. Fortson, P. Sandars and S. Barr Phys. Today 2003
36. Y. Semertzidis hep-ex/0401016
37. S. Weinberg Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 1998 2333
38. T. Appelquist and G.-H. Wu Phys. Rev. D 51 1995 240
39. P. Harris Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1999 904
40. See also S. Lamoreaux and R. Golub Phys. Rev. D 61 2000 051301
41. T. Falk, K. Olive, M. Pospelov and R. Roiban Nucl. Phys. B 560 1999 3
42. M. Romalis, W. Griffith, J. Jacobs and E.N. Fortson Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2001 2505