New experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 904-907

  Harris, P G ^a,b   Baker, C A ^a   Green, K ^a   Iaydjiev, P ^a,d   Ivanov, S ^a,e   May, D J R ^b   Pendlebury, J M ^b   Shiers, D ^b   Smith, K F ^b   van der Grinten, M ^b   Geltenbort, P ^c  

^a RUTHERFORD APPLETON LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUT LAUE LANGEVIN   (France)

^d INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH AND NUCLEAR ENERGY   (Bulgaria)

^e PETERSBURG NUCLEAR PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; LEAKAGE CURRENTS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETOMETERS; NEUTRONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; POLARIZATION;

ATOMIC MERCURY MAGNETOMETER; ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD FLUCTUATIONS;

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS;

EID: 0033074367     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.904     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. S. M. Barr, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8, 209 (1993).
2. J. H. Christenson, J. W. Cronin, V. L. Fitch, and R. Turlay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 138 (1964).
3. J. Ellis, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 284, 33 (1989).
4. K. F. Smith, et al, Phys. Lett. B 234, 191 (1990).
5. I. S. Altarev, et al, Phys. At. Nucl. 59, 1152 (1996).
6. N. F. Ramsey, Acta Phys. Hung. 55, 117 (1984).
7. J. P. Jacobs, et al, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3521 (1995)
8. J. P. Jacobs, et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3782 (1993)
9. S. K. Lamoreaux, et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2275 (1987).
10. M. G. D. van der Grinten, et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A (to be published).
11. K. Green, et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 404, 381 (1998).