Adaptive band selection for hyperspectral image fusion using mutual information

2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 630-637

  Guo, Baofeng ^a   Gunn, Steve ^a   Damper, Bob ^a   Nelson, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAND STRUCTURE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; ENTROPY; PROBLEM SOLVING; TARGETS;

ADAPTIVE BAND SELECTION; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY; MULTIPLE SPECTRAL BANDS; MUTUAL INFORMATION (MI);

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 33847151380     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIF.2005.1591913     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. AVIRIS. Airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer. http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/.
2. G. Hughes. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE transaction on Information Theory, 14:55-63, 1968.
3. G. Petrie, P. Heasler, and T. Warner. Optimal band selection strategies for hyperspectral data sets. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, pages 1582-1584, July 1998.
4. P. Groves and P. Bajcsy. Methodology for hyperspectral band and classification model selection. In IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, pages 120-128, 2003.
5. C-I. Chang, D. Qian, T-L. Sun, and M. Althouse. A joint band prioritization and band-decorrelation approach to band selection for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(6):2631-2641, 1999.
6. M. Velez-Reyes and L. Jimenez. Subset selection analysis for the reduction of hyperspectral imagery. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, volume 3, pages 1577-1581, 1998.
7. P. Bajcsy and P. Groves. Methodology for hyperspectral band selection. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing Journal, 70(7):793-802, July 2004.
8. J. Price. Spectral band selection for visible-near infrared remote sensing; spectral-spatial resolution tradeoffs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(5):1277-1285, 1997.
9. N. Keshava. Best bands selection for detection in hyperspectral processing. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 5, pages 3149-3152, 2001.
10. D. Qian, Band selection and its impact on target detection and classification in hyperspectral image analysis. In IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, pages 374-377, 2003.
11. S. Kaewpijit, J.L. Moigne, and T. EI-Ghazawi. Automatic reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet spectral analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(4):863-871, 2003.
12. C. Conesea and F. Masellia. Selection of optimum bands from tm scenes through mutual information analysis. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 48(3):2-11, 1993.
13. E. P. Blasen and M. Bryant Information assessment of sar data for atr. In Proceedings of IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, pages 414-419, Dayton, OH, July 1998.
14. N. Blachman. The amount of information that y gives about x. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14(1):27-31, 1968.
15. J. Pluim, J. Maintz, and M. Viergever. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22(8):986-1004, 2003.
16. C. Burges. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2(2):121-167, 1998.
17. S.R. Gunn. Support vector machines for classification and regression. Technical Report, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, U.K., 1998.
18. J. Gualtieri and R. Cromp. Support vector machines for hyperspectral remote sensing classification. In Proceeding of the 27th AIPR Workshop: Advances in Computer Assisted Recognition, pages 121-132, Washington DC, 1998.
19. M. Lennon, G. Mercier, and L. Hubert-Moy. Classification of hyperspectral images with nonlinear filtering and support vector machines. In Proceeding of IGARSS 2002, oronto, Canada, June 2002.
20. F. Melgani and L. Bruzzone. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(8): 1778-1790, Aug 2004.
21. C.A. Shah, P. Watanachaturaporn, M.K. Arora, and P.K. Varshney. Some recent results on hyperspectral image classification. In IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, NASA Goddard Space-flight centre, Greenbelt, MD, October 2003.