A GIS model for settlement suitability regarding disaster mitigation, a case study in Bolu Turkey

Engineering Geology

Volumn 96, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 126-140

  Alparslan, E ^a   Ince, F ^b   Erkan, B ^a   Aydoner C ^a   Ozen H ^a   Donertas A ^a   Ergintav, S ^a   Yagsan F S ^c   Zaterogullari A ^c   Eroglu I ^c   Deger M ^c   Elalmis H ^c   Ozkan M ^c  

^a SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF TURKEY   (Turkey)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c Governorship of Bolu   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Basement type; BT; CLU; Contemporary land use; Contemporary road network; CRN; Disaster mitigation; Distance from main fault; DMF; Earthquakes; GA; General Commander of Mapping, Turkey; General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Turkey; Geographic Information Systems; GIS; Global Positioning System; GPS; Ground acceleration; HEO; HGK; High settlement suitability; Historical earthquake occurrence; HSS; Indian Remote Sensing Satellite; IRS; Land and Water General Directorate of Rural Affairs General Directorate of Turkey; Land use capability classes; LANDSAT; Low settlement suitability; LSS; LUCC; Medium settlement suitability; MSS; MTA; NAF; North Anatolian Fault; Partial settlement suitability grade; PSSG; S; Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.; Settlement suitability; Settlement suitability map; SSM; Terrain slope; Thematic Mapper; TM; TOPRAKSU; TUBITAK; United States Remote Sensing Satellite

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EARTHQUAKES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; LAND USE; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY;

CONTEMPORARY LAND USE; CONTEMPORARY ROAD NETWORK; DISASTER MITIGATION; THEMATIC MAPPER;

DISASTERS;

DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; GIS; GPS; LAND USE; LANDSAT; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SEISMIC HAZARD; THEMATIC MAPPING;

BOLU [TURKEY]; EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 38349177343     PISSN: 00137952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ADRC Disaster Report on Turkey. Earthquake. 1999/11/12 via (2000). http://www.adrc.or.jp/view_disaster_en.php?Lang=en&Key=89&Frame= yes Cited 24 Jan
2. Campbell K.W. Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismological Research Letters 68 1 (1997) 154-179
3. Carayannis G.P. Special bulletin on the earthquake of Nov. 12, 1999. via (1999). http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/4870/Earthquake1999Turkey2.htm l cited Nov 20
4. Chen H., and Lee C.F. A dynamic model for rainfall-induced landslides on natural slopes. Geomorphology 51 (2003) 269-288
5. Fratini P., Crosta G.B., Fusi N., and Dal Negro P. Shallow landslides in pyroclastic soils: a distributed modeling approach for hazard assessment. Engineering Geology 73 (2004) 277-295
6. Gupta A., and Shah H.J. The strategy effectiveness chart A tool for evaluating earthquake disaster mitigation strategies. Applied Geography 18 1 (1998) 55-67
7. Iglseder H., Avens-Fischer W., and Wolfsberger W. Small satellite constellations for disaster detection and monitoring. Advances in Space Research 15 11 (1995) 79-85
8. Jayaraman V., Chandrasekhar M.G., and Rao U.R. Managing the natural disasters from space technology inputs. Acta Astronautica 40 2-8 (1997) 291-325
9. Ju J., Gopal S., and Kolaczyk E.D. On the choice of spatial and categorical scale in remote sensing land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 96 1 (2005) 62-77
10. Keeney J.B. Disaster preparedness: what do we do now?. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 49 suppl 1 (2004) 2-6 Nurse-Midwives
11. Kent G. The human right to disaster mitigation and relief. Environmental Hazards 3 (2001) 137-138
12. Koudelka, O., Schrotter, P. in press. Satellite services for disaster management and security applications, Acta Astronautica, In Press, available online 16.02.07.
13. Luscombe B.W., and Hassan H.M. Applying remote sensing technologies to natural disaster risk management: implications for developmental investments. Acta Astronica 29 10/11 (1993) 871-876
14. Mas J.F. Mapping land use/cover in a tropical coastal area using satellite sensor data, GIS and artificial neural networks. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 59 2 (2004) 219-230
15. Metternicht G. Assessing temporal and spatial changes of salinity using fuzzy logic, remote sensing and GIS, foundations of an expert system. Ecological Modelling 144 (2001) 163-179
16. Mitchell G. Mapping hazard from urban non-point pollution: a screening model to support sustainable urban drainage planning. Journal of Environmental Management 74 (2004) 1-9
17. Montoya L. Geo-data acquisition through mobile GIS and digital video: an urban disaster management respective. Environmental Modelling & Software 18 (2003) 869-876
18. Montoya L., and Masser I. Management of natural hazard risk in Cartago, Costa Rica. Habitat International 29 (2005) 493-509
19. Ozmen B., and Bagci G. 12 November 1999 Duzce Earthquake Report, Ministry of Public Affairs, Earthquake Research Office (2000) Ankara
20. Ozden S., Tatar O., Mesci B.L., Kocbulut F., Tutkun S.Z., Dogan B., and Tuvar O. 12 November 1999 Düzce earthquake and the regional significance. Geological Bulletin of Turkey 43 (2000) 2
21. Saroglu F., Emre O., and Kuscu I. Active Fault Map of Turkey (1992), MTA, Ankara
22. Shrivastava R.J., and Gebelein J.L. Land cover classification and economic assessment of citrus groves using remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 61 5 (2007) 341-353
23. Tapirdamaz M.C. Türkiye'nin Paleomanyetik Veri Kataloǧu, (Turkey's Paleomagnetic Data Catalog), ATAG 9 (2005), Cumhuriyet University, Sivas
24. TOPRAKSU. Bolu Province Land Information, Rural Affairs General Directorate (1991), Publication Works Branch Directorate, Province Report no 14, Ankara (in Turkish)
25. Tralli D.M., Blom R.G., Zlotnicki V., Donnellan A., and Evans D.L. Satellite remote sensing of earthquake, volcano, flood, landslide and coastal inundation hazards. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry nad Remote Sensing 59 4 (2005) 195-198
26. TUBITAK MRC EMSI Bolu Project Final Report. Establishment of Basic GIS Layers for Bolu Province and Settlement Suitability Determination (in Turkish) (2002)
27. Tunis II Declaration. Natural disasters and the role of satellite remote sensing economic and legal considerations. Space Policy 22 3 (2006) 214-215
28. Verstappen H.T. Aerospace technology and natural disaster reduction. Advances in Space Research 15 11 (1995) 3-15
29. Xiaoli X. Asia Pacific satellite disaster mitigation system. Space Technology 18 4 (1998) 207-210
30. Yildirim H., Alparslan E., and Ozel M.E. Data fusion of sharpened difference by IHS transform. Proc. of Fusion of Earth Data (1996), Cannes, France 125-130
31. Yuan F., Sawaya K.E., Loeffelholz B.C., and Bauer M.E. Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 98 2-3 (2005) 317-328
32. Zerger A. Examining GIS decision utility for natural hazard risk modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 17 (2002) 287-294
33. Zerger A., and Smith D.E. Impediments to using GIS for real-time decision support. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27 (2003) 123-141