Land cover classification and economic assessment of citrus groves using remote sensing

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 341-353

  Shrivastava, Rahul J ^a   Gebelein, Jennifer L ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Citrus Grove Area Estimation; Economy; Landsat

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CROPS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; HARVESTING;

CITRUS GROVE AREA ESTIMATION; ECONOMY; LANDSAT; TOURISM;

REMOTE SENSING;

ANGIOSPERM; CROP PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; TREE;

AGRICULTURE; FARM CROPS; HARVESTING; REMOTE SENSING;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CITRUS;

EID: 33845650986     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arslan S., and Colvin T.S. An evaluation of the response of yield monitors and combines to varying yields. Precision Agriculture 3 2 (2002) 107-122
2. Bach H. Yield estimation of corn based on multitemporal LANDSAT-TM data as input for an agrometeorological model. Pure and Applied Optics 7 4 (1998) 809-825
3. Blazquez C.H., Adair Jr. R.C., Dennis G.D., Butts J., Brady D., and Whittaker H.M. Application of aerial photography and videography to citrus tree inventory. Proc. Florida State Horticultural Society Meeting, St. Petersburg, FL, 1-3 November (1998) 173-177
4. Carter G.A., and Knapp A.K. Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. American Journal of Botany 88 4 (2001) 677-684
5. Cayo M.R., and Talbot T.O. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses. International Journal of Health Geographics 2 1 (2003) 10
6. Craig J.C., and Shih S.F. The spectral response of stress conditions in citrus trees: development of methodology. Proc. Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida Annual Meeting, Daytona Beach, FL, 17-19 September 1997 (1998) 16-20
7. Doraiswamy P.C., Moulin S., Cook P.W., and Stern A. Crop yield assessment from remote sensing. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69 6 (2003) 665-674
8. Doraiswamy P.C., Hatfield J.L., Jackson T.L., Akhmedov B., Prueger J., and Stern A. Crop condition and yield simulations using Landsat and MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 92 4 (2004) 548-559
9. Dwivedi R.S., and Rao B.R.M. The selection of the best possible Landsat TM band combination for delineating salt-affected soils. International Journal of Remote Sensing 13 11 (1992) 2051-2058
10. FASS. Commercial Citrus Inventory (2002), Florida Agricultural Statistics Service National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.nass.usda.gov/fl/citrus/cci/2002/cci02p.htm http://www.nass.usda.gov/fl/citrus/cci/2002/cci02p.htm (accessed January 21, 2006)
11. FASS. Citrus Summary 2002-2003 (2003), Florida Agricultural Statistics Service, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.nass.usda.gov/fl/citrus/cspre/cit91803.pdf http://www.nass.usda.gov/fl/citrus/cspre/cit91803.pdf (accessed January 21, 2006)
12. Fletcher R.S. Evaluating high spatial resolution imagery for detecting citrus orchards affected by sooty mould. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26 3 (2005) 495-502
13. Fletcher R.S., Escobar D.E., and Skaria M. Evaluating airborne normalized difference vegetation index imagery for citrus orchard surveys. HortTechnology 14 1 (2004) 91-94
14. Florida Department of Citrus. Florida Citrus Outlook 2003-04 Season (2003), Government of Florida. http://www.floridajuice.com/user_upload/files/outlok03_422f25b60f39b.pdf http://www.floridajuice.com/user_upload/files/outlok03_422f25b60f39b.pdf (accessed January 21, 2006)
15. Ganapol B.D., Johnson L.F., Hlavka C.A., Peterson D.L., and Bond B. LCM2: a coupled leaf/canopy radiative transfer model. Remote Sensing of Environment 70 2 (1999) 153-166
16. Gausman H.W. Leaf reflectance of near-infrared. Photogrammetric Engineering 40 (1974) 183-191
17. Gausman H.W. Evaluation of factors causing reflectance differences between sun and shade leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment 15 2 (1984) 203-208
18. Gilabert M.A., and Melia J. A simple geometrical model for analyzing the spectral response of a citrus canopy using satellite images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 11 (1990) 1391-1403
19. Gordon D.K., and Philipson W.R. A texture-enhancement procedure for separating orchard from forest in Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 7 2 (1986) 301-304
20. Gordon D.K., Philipson W.R., and Philpot W.D. Fruit tree inventory with Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52 12 (1986) 1871-1876
21. Hodges A., and Mulkey D. Terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington, D.C.: implications for the Florida tourism industry. Electronic Data Information Source Document FE316 (2001), Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FE316 http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FE316 (accessed January 18, 2006)
22. Holland M. How FASS forecasts the citrus crop. Citrus Industry 74 3 (1993) 24-26
23. Idso S.B. Non-water-stressed baselines: a key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress. Agricultural Meteorology 27 (1982) 59-70
24. Ippoliti-Ramilo G.A., Epiphanio J.C.N., and Shimabukuro Y.E. Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper data for pre-planting crop area evaluation in tropical countries. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24 7 (2003) 1521-1534
25. Jackson R.D. Canopy temperature and crop water stress. Advances in Irrigation 1 (1982) 43-85
26. Jackson R.D., Idso S.B., Reginato R.J., and Pinter P.J. Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. Water Resource Research 17 (1981) 1133-1138
27. Lillesand T.M., Kiefer R.W., and Chipman J.W. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. fifth ed. (2004), J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
28. Lobell D.B., Asner G.P., and Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio J. Regional wheat yield predicting using Landsat 7 satellite imagery. Third International Conference on Geo-spatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry, Denver, Colorado, 5-7 November 2001 (2001). http://asnerlab.stanford.edu/publication.shtml http://asnerlab.stanford.edu/publication.shtml (accessed October 16, 2006)
29. Lobell D.B., Asner G.P., Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio J., and Benning T.L. Remote sensing of regional crop production in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico: estimates and uncertainties. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 94 2 (2003) 205-220
30. MacDonald R.B., and Hall F.G. Global crop forecasting. Science 208 4445 (1980) 670-680
31. McCoy C.W., Rogers M.E., Futch S.H., Graham J.H., Duncan L.W., and Nigg H.N. 2006 Florida Citrus Pest Management Guide: Citrus Root Weevils. Document ENY611 (2006), Entomology and Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/CG006 http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/CG006 (accessed January 21, 2006)
32. Moulin S., Bondeau A., and Delecolle R. Combining agricultural crop models and satellite observations: from field to regional scales. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19 6 (1998) 1021-1036
33. Moutanga O., Skidmore A.K., and van Wieren S. Discriminating tropical grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) canopies grown under different nitrogen treatments using spectroradiometry. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 57 4 (2003) 263-272
34. NASS, 2006. Florida′s Office of USDA′s NASS, National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Florida/index.asp, (Accessed August 6, 2006).
35. Nilsson H. Remote sensing and image analysis in plant pathology. Annual Review of Phytopathology 333 (1995) 489-528
36. Nixon P.R., Escobar D.E., and Menges R.M. A multiband video system for quick assessment of vegetal condition and discrimination of plant species. Remote Sensing of Environment 17 2 (1985) 203-208
37. Nouvellon Y., Moran M.S., Seen D.L., Bryant R., Rambal S., Ni W., Bégué A., Chehbouni A., Emmerich W.E., Heilman P., and Qi J. Coupling a grassland ecosystem model with Landsat imagery for a 10-year simulation of carbon and water budgets. Remote Sensing of Environment 78 1-2 (2001) 131-149
38. Olthof I., King D.J., and Lautenschlager R.A. Mapping deciduous forest ice storm damage using Landsat and environmental data. Remote Sensing of Environment 89 4 (2004) 484-496
39. Pickup G., Chewings V.H., and Pearce G. Procedures for correcting high resolution airborne video imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16 9 (1995) 1647-1662
40. Pick-Your-Own-Farms. Pick Your Own Farms in Florida (2005). http://www.pickyourown.org/FL.htm http://www.pickyourown.org/FL.htm (Accessed March 18, 2005)
41. Pinter P.J., Hatfield J.L., Schepers J.S., Barnes E.M., Moran M.S., Daughtry C.S.T., and Upchurch D.R. Remote sensing for crop management. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69 6 (2003) 647-664
42. Reginato R.J., and Howe J. Irrigation scheduling using crop indicators. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 111 2 (1985) 125-133
43. Richardson A.J., Wiegand C.L., Torline R.J., and Gautreaux M.R. Landsat agricultural land-use survey. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 43 (1977) 207-216
44. Richardson A.J., Everitt J.H., and Escobar D.E. Calibration of gain compensated aerial video remote sensing imagery using ground control reflection standard. Proc. 13th Biennial Workshop on Colour Aerial Photography in the Plant Sciences and Related Fields (1992), American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Orlando, FL 87-97
45. Riley J.R. Remote sensing in entomology. Annual Review of Entomology 34 (1989) 247-271
46. Saich P., and Borgeaud M. Interpreting ERS SAR signatures of agricultural crops in Flevoland, 1993-1996. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 2 (2000) 651-657
47. Schotten C.G.J., Vanrooy W.W.L., and Janssen L.L.F. Assessment of the capabilities of multitemporal ERS-1 SAR data to discriminate between agricultural crops. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16 14 (1995) 2619-2637
48. Sharma T., Sudha K.S., Ravi N., Navalgund R.R., Tomar K.P., Chakravarty N.V.K., and Das D.K. Procedures for wheat yield prediction using Landsat MSS and IRS-1A data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14 13 (1993) 2509-2518
49. Singh R., Semwal D.P., Rai A., and Chhikara R.S. Small area estimation of crop yield using remote sensing satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 1 (2002) 49-56
50. Sun J.L. Dynamic monitoring and yield estimation of crops by mainly using the remote sensing technique in China. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66 5 (2000) 645-650
51. Symeonakis E., Koukoulas S., Calvo C.A., Arnau R.E., and Makris I. A landuse change and land degradation study in Spain and Greece using remote sensing and GIS. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 35 Part B7 (2004) 553-558
52. Tardin A.T., Deassuncao G.V., and Soares J.V. Preliminary analysis of TM data for coffee, citrus and sugarcane discrimination in Furnas Region, MG, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 27 9 (1992) 1355-1361
53. TerraFly. Virtually Fly Over the Entire United States (2005). http://www.terrafly.com/ http://www.terrafly.com/ (Accessed March 18, 2005)
54. Thomasson J.A., and Sui R. Advanced optical cotton yield monitor. In: Richter D.A. (Ed). Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 4-8 January, 2000 (2000) 408-410
55. Thomasson J.A., and Sui R. Mississippi cotton yield monitor: three years of field-test results. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 19 6 (2003) 631-636
56. Tucker D.P.H., Wheaton T.A., and Muraro R.P. Citrus tree spacing. Fact Sheet HS-143 of the Horticultural Sciences Department (1992), Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/CH/CH02600.pdf http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/CH/CH02600.pdf (accessed January 18, 2006)
57. Unal E., Mermer A., and Dogan H.M. Determining major orchard (pistachio, olive, vineyard) areas in Gaziantep Province using remote sensing techniques. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 35 Part B7 (2004) 160-163
58. USDA. Census of Agriculture (2006), National Agriculture Statistics Service. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/index.asp http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/index.asp (accessed January 22, 2006)
59. USGS. EO-1 Data Products: Hyperion (2006), United States Geological Survey. http://eo1.usgs.gov/userGuide/hyp_prod.html http://eo1.usgs.gov/userGuide/hyp_prod.html (accessed August 6, 2006)
60. Vogelmann J.E., and Rock B.N. Use of thematic mapper data for the detection of forest damage caused by the pear thrips. Remote Sensing of Environment 30 3 (1989) 217-225
61. Yang C., and Anderson G.L. Determining within-field management zones for grain sorghum using aerial videography. Proc. 26th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 25-29 March, Vancouver, B.C. (1996) 606-611
62. Ziegler L.W., and Wolfe H.S. Citrus Growing in Florida (1975), The University Presses of Florida, Gainesville