Plastid DNA sequences reveal generic paraphyly within Diosmeae (Rutoideae, Rutaceae)

Systematic Botany

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 847-855

  Trinder Smith, Terry H ^a   Linder, H Peter ^b   Van Der Niet, Timotheüs ^b   Verboom, G Anthony ^a   Nowell, Tracey L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Cape clade; Generic boundaries; Parsimony

Indexed keywords

RUTACEAE;

EID: 38349172751     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364407783390890     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. BARTLING, F. G. and H. L. WENTLAND. 1824. Diosmeae descriptae et illustratae. Beiträge zur Botanik vol. 1. Göttingen: Van der Hoek & Ruprecht.
2. BENTHAM, G. and J. D. HOOKER. 1862. Rutaceae. Pp. 278-306 in Genera Plantarum vol. 1. London.
3. BROWER, A. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 334-335.
4. CAMPBELL, W. E. 1996. Coumarins from Acmadenia sheilae (Rutaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 589.
5. _ and P. A. BEAN. 1996. Quinoline Alkaloids from Agathosma barosmaefolia (Rutaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 591.
6. _, B. DAVIDOWITZ, and G. JACKSON. 1990. Coumarins of the Rutoideae: tribe Diosmeae. Phytochemistry 29: 1303-1306.
7. _, K. P. FINCH, P. A. BEAŃ, and N. FINKELSTEIN. 1987. Alkaloids of the Rutoideae: tribe Diosmeae. Phytochemistry 26: 433-434.
8. _, T. MAJAL, and P. A. BEAN. 1986. Coumarins of the Rutoideae: tribe Diosmeae. Phytochemistry 25: 655-657.
9. CANDOLLE, M. de. 1822. Mémoire sur la tribu des Cuspariées. Mémoires du Muséum d' Histoire Naturelle, Paris 9: 139-154.
10. CHASE, M. W., C. M. MORTON, and J. A. KALLUNKI. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subframilies using evidence from rbcL and atpB sequence variation. American Journal of Botany 86: 1191-1199.
11. DA SILVA, M. F. DAS G. F., O. R. GOTTLIEB, and F. EHRENDORPHER. 1988. Chemosystematics of the Rutaceae: suggestions for a more natural taxonomy and evolutionary interpretation of the family. Plant Systematics and Evolution 161: 97-134.
12. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1897. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
13. ENGLER, A. 1896. Rutaceae. Pp. 95-201 in Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien ed. 1 teil III abt. 4. Leipzig: W. Engelman.
14. _. 1931. Rutaceae. Pp. 187-359 in Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 2nd ed. Vol. 19a, eds. A. Engler and H. Harms. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
15. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Towards defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 404-416.
16. GALLEY, C. and H. P. LINDER. 2006. Geographical affinities of the Cape flora, South Africa. Journal of Biogeography 33: 236-250.
17. GOLDBLATT, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of southern Africa: its characteristics, relationships and origins. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 369-436.
18. _ and I. WILLIAMS. 1987. Notes on chromosome cytology of Rutaceae-Diosmeae. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 74: 443-444.
19. _, H. TOBE, C. CARLQUIST, and V. C. PATEL. 1985. The familial position of the Cape genus Empleuridium. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 72: 167-183.
20. HOLMGREN, P. K., N. H. HOLMGREN, and L. C. BARNETT, eds. 1990. Index herbariorum, part I: the herbaria of the world, eighth edition. Regnum Vegetabile 120: 1-693, (updated online at: http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHebariorum.asp)
21. HUELSENBECK, J. P. and B. RANNALA. 2004. Frequentist properties of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Systematic Biology. 53: 904-913.
22. _ and F. RONQUIST. 2001. Mr. Bayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17: 754-755.
23. KELCHNER, S. A. and L. G. CLARK. 1997. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpL16 intron in Chusquea and the Bambusoiseae (Poaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 385-397.
24. LINDER, H. P. 1998. Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. Pp. 123-135 in Reproductive Biology, eds. S. J. Owens and P. J. Rudall. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
25. _. 2003. The radiation of the Cape flora, southern Africa. Biological Reviews 78: 597-638.
26. MANEN, F. J., A. NATALI, and F. EHRENDORFER. 1997. Phylogeny of Rubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. Plant Systematics and Evolution 190: 195-211.
27. MARLOTH, R. 1908. Das Kapland, insonderheit das Reich der Kapflora, das Waldgebiet und die Karroo, pflanzengeographisch dargestelt. Pp. 1-427 in Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer "Vivaldiva" 1898-1988, ed. C. Chun. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
28. NICHOLAS, K. B. and H. B. NICHOLAS JNR. 1997. GeneDoc version 2.6.02: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Available at www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc/index.html.
29. NIXON, K. C. and J. M. CARPENTER. 1996. On simultaneous analyses. Cladistics 12: 221-241.
30. PILLANS, N. S. 1950. A revision of the genus Agathosma. Journal of South African Botany 16: 55-183.
31. RILEY, H. P. and V. J. HOFF. 1961. Chromosome studies on some South African dicotyledons. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 3: 260-271.
32. SANG, T., D. J. CRAWFORD, and T. F. STUESSY. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1120-1136.
33. SCHLECHTER, R. 1897. Plantae Schlecterianae novae vel minus cognitae describuntur. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematic 24: 457.
34. SCOTT, K. D., C. L. MCINTYRE, and J. PLAYFORD. 2000. Molecular analyses suggest a need for a significant rearrangement of Rutaceae subfamilies and a minor reassessment of species relationships within Flindersia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 15-27.
35. SIMMONS, M. P. and H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49(2), 369-381.
36. SMITH-WHITE, S. 1954. Chromosome numbers in the Boronieae (Rutaceae) and their bearing on the evolutionary development in the tribe in the Australian flora. Australian Journal of Botany 2: 287-303.
37. SONDER, O. W. 1860. Rutaceae. Pp. 369-442 in Flora Capensis vol 1, eds. W. H. Harvey and O. W. Sonder. Dublin: Hodges, Smith & Co.
38. SPRENGEL, C. 1825. Diosma. Pp. 782-788 in Caroli Linnaei Systema Vegetabilium ed. 16.1. Götingen: Librariae Dieterichianae.
39. STRID, A. 1972. Revision of the genus Adenandra (Rutaceae). Opera Botanica 32: 1-112.
40. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
41. VAN WYK, B-E., B. VAN OUDTSHOORN, and N. GERICKE. 1997. Medicinal plants of southern Africa. Pretoria: Briza Publications.
42. VICTOR, J. E. and A. E. VAN WYK. 1998. Palynolygy of Acmadenia (Diosminae: Rutaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Grana 37: 143-154.
43. _ and _. 1999a. Pollen morphology of Diosma and Coleonema (Rutaceae: Diosminae). Grana 38: 12-19.
44. _ and _. 1999b. Pollen morphology of Adenandra (Rutaceae: Diosminae) and its taxonomic implications. Grana 38: 1-11.
45. _ and _. 2000. Pollen morphology of Phyllosma and Sheilanthera (Rutaceae: Diosminae) and its taxonomic implications. Grana 39: 103-107.
46. _ and _. 2001. Pollen morphlogy of Euchaetis and Macrostylis (Rutaceae: Diosminae) and its taxonomic implications. Grana 40: 105-110.
47. WEIMARK, H. 1941. Phytogeographical groups, centres and intervals within the Cape Flora. Lunds Universitet Arsskrift 37: 3-143.
48. WIKSTRÖM, N., V. SAVOLAINEN, and M. W. CHASE. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 2211-2220.
49. WILLIAMS, I. 1981a. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 9: A revision of the genus Coleonema. Journal of South African Botany 47: 63-102.
50. _. 1981b. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 10: A review of the genus Euchaetis. Journal of South African Botany 47: 157-193.
51. _. 1981c. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 11: A review of the genus Macrostylis. Journal of South African Botany 47: 373-403.
52. _. 1981d. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 12: A revision of the genus Phyllosma and a proposed new genus Sheilanthera. Journal of South African Botany 47: 755-764.
53. _. 1982a. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 13: A review of the genus Diosma L. Journal of South African Botany 48: 329-407.
54. _. 1982b. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 14: A revision of the genus Acmadenia Bartl. & Wendl. Journal of South African Botany 48: 169-240.
55. _. 1984. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 15: A review of the genus Empleurum Aiton. Journal of South African Botany 50: 425-434.
56. _. 1985. Studies in the genera of Diosmeae (Rutaceae) 16: A key to the genera of the Diosmeae Benth. & Hook. (Rutaceae) and a description of a new species of Agathosma (Rutaceae). South African Journal of Botany 51: 149-151.