How late can you update gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays without detection

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Loschky, Lester C ^a   Wolverton, Gary S ^b  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Area of interest; Blur detection; Contrast thresholds; Display updates; Eye movements; eye tracking; Foveated; Foveation; Gaze contingent; Level of detail; Multiresolution; Perceptual compression; Saccades; Saccadic suppression; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

GAZE-CONTINGENT MULTIRESOLUTIONAL DISPLAYS (GCMRD); PERCEPTUAL COMPRESSION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

BANDWIDTH; MULTIRESOLUTION ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

IMAGE RESOLUTION;

EID: 38349169893     PISSN: 15516857     EISSN: 15516865     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1314303.1314310     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BURR, D. C., MORRONE, M. C., AND ROSS, J. 1994. Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature 371, 6947, 511-513.
2. DRAPER, M. H., VIIRRE, E. S., FURNESS, T. A., AND GAWRON, V. J. 2001. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Hum. Factors 43, 1, 129-146.
3. DUCHOWSKI, A. T., COURNIA, N., AND MURPHY, H. 2004. Gaze-Contingent displays: A review. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 7, 6, 621-634.
4. DUCHOWSKI, A. T. AND ÇÖLTEKIN, A. 2007. Foveated gaze-contingent displays for peripheral LOD management, 3D visualization and stereo imaging. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 3, 4 (this issue).
5. FRANK, L. H., CASALI, J. G., AND WIERWILLE, W. W. 1988. Effects of visual display and motion system delays on operator performance and uneasiness in a driving simulator. Hum. Factors 30, 2, 201-217.
6. GEISLER, W. S. AND PERRY, J. S. 1998. A real-time foveated multi-resolution system for low-bandwidth video communication. In Proceedings of the SPIE: The International Society for Optical Engineering 3299, 294-305.
7. GEISLER, W. S. AND PERRY, J. S. 1999. Variable-Resolution displays for visual communication and simulation. Soc. Inf. Display, 30, 420-423.
8. GERI, G. A. AND ZEEVI, Y. Y. 1995. Visual assessment of variable-resolution imagery. J. Optic. Soc. Amer. A-Optic. Image Sci. 12, 10, 2367-2375.
9. GRUNWALD, A. J. AND KOHN, S. 1994. Visual field information in low-altitude visual flight by line-of-sight slaved helmet-mounted displays. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 24, 1, 120-134.
10. HODGSON, T. L., MURRAY, P. M., AND PLUMMER, A. R. 1993. Eye movements during "area of interest" viewing. In Perception and Cognition: Advances in Eye Movement Research, G. d'Ydewalle and J. V. Rensbergen, eds. Elsevier Science, New York, 115-123.
11. KOMOGORTSEY, O. AND KHAN, J. 2004. Predictive perceptual compression for real time video compression. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, New York, 220-227.
12. KORTUM, P. T. AND GEISLER, W. S. 1996. Search performance in natural scenes: The role of peripheral vision. Investigat. Ophthamal. Visual Sci. 37, 3, S297.
13. LOSCHKY, L. C. AND MCCONKIE, G. W. 2002. Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multi-resolutional display. J. Exper. Psychol. Appl. 8, 2, 99-117.
14. LOSCHKY, L. C. AND MCCONKIE, G. W. 2000. User performance with gaze contingent multiresolutional displays. In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium, Palm Beach, FL, 97-103.
15. LOSCHKY, L. C., MCCONKIE, G. W., YANG, J., AND MILLER, M. E. 2005. The limits of visual resolution in natural scene viewing. Visual Cogn. 12, 6, 1057-1092.
16. LUEBKE, D., HALLEN, B., NEWFIELD, D., AND WATSON, B. 2000. Perceptually driven simplification using gaze-directed rendering. Tech. Rep. CS-2000-04, Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
17. MCCONKIE, G. W. AND LOSCHKY, L. C. 2002. Perception onset time during fixations in free viewing. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 34, 4, 481-490.
18. OHSHIMA, T., YAMAMOTO, H., AND TAMURA, H. 1996. Gaze-Directed adaptive rendering for interacting with virtual space. In Proceedings of the Annual International IEEE Symposium on Virtual Reality, 103-110.
19. PARKHURST, D., CULURCIELLO, E., AND NEIBUR, E. 2000. Evaluating variable resolution displays with visual search: Task performance and eye movements. In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium, Palm Beach, FL, A. T. Duchowski, ed. 105-109.
20. PARKHURST, D. J. AND NEIBUR, E. 2002. Variable resolution displays: A theoretical, practical and behavioral evaluation. Hum. Factors 44, 611-629.
21. REINGOLD, E. M. AND LOSCHKY, L. C. 2002. Saliency of peripheral targets in gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 34, 4, 491-499.
22. REINGOLD, E. M., LOSCHKY, L. C., MCCONKIE, G. W., AND STAMPE, D. M. 2003. Gaze-Contingent multiresolutional displays: An integrative review. Hum. Factors 45, 2, 307-328.
23. REINGOLD, E. M. AND STAMPE, D. M. 2000. Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In Reading as a Perceptual Process, A. Kennedy et al., Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 119-145.
24. ROSS, J., MORRONE, M. C., GOLDBERG, M. E., AND BURR, D. C. 2001. Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends Neurosci. 24, 2, 113-121.
25. SERE, B., MARENDAZ, C., AND HERAULT, J. 2000. Nonhomogenous resolution of images of natural scenes. Percept. 29, 12, 1403-1412.
26. SHIOIRI, S. 1993. Postsaccadic processing of the retinal image during picture scanning. Percept. Psychophys. 53, 3, 305-314.
27. SHIOIRI, S. AND IKEDA, M. 1989. Useful resolution for picture perception as a function of eccentricity. Percept. 18, 347-361.
28. THOMAS, M. AND GELTMACHER, H. 1993. Combat simulator display development. Inf. Display 9, 23-26.
29. TURNER, J. A. 1984. Evaluation of an eye-slaved area-of-interest display for tactical combat simulation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Interservice I Industry Training Equipment Conference and Exhibition, 75-86.
30. VAN DIEPEN, P. M. J. AND WAMPERS, M. 1998. Scene exploration with Fourier-filtered peripheral information. Percept. 27, 10, 1141-1151.
31. VOLKMANN, F. C., RIGGS, L. A., WHITE, K. D., AND MOORE, R. K. 1978. Contrast sensitivity during saccadic eye movements. Vision Res. 18, 9, 1193-1199.
32. WATSON, B. A., WALKER, N., HODGES, L. F., AND WORDEN, A. 1997. Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: Effects on search performance with a head-mounted display. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 4, 4, 323-346.
33. YANG, J., COIA, T., AND MILLER, M. 2001. Subjective evaluation of retinal-dependent image degradations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Processing, Image Quality and Image Capture Systems, Springfield, VA. 142-147.