Probabilistic aftershock hazard assessment II: Application of strong ground motion simulations

Journal of Seismology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 65-78

  Gallovič, František ^a   Brokešová, Johana ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Aftershock statistics; Omori's law; Strong ground motion simulations; Time dependent aftershock probabilistic hazard

Indexed keywords

AFTERSHOCK; EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER; GROUND MOTION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; PEAK ACCELERATION; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SIMULATION; STRONG MOTION;

EID: 38349161329     PISSN: 13834649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-007-9070-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andrews DJ (1980) A stochastic fault model, 1. Static case. J Geophys Res 85:3867-3877
2. Bouchon M, Toksöz N, Karabulut H, Bouin M, Dietrich M, Aktar M, Edie M (2000) Seismic imaging of the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) rupture inferred from the near-fault recordings. Geophys Res Lett 27(18):3013-3016
3. Brokešová J. (2006) Asymptotic ray method in seismology: A tutorial. Matfyzpress, Prague
4. Červený V (2001) Seismic ray theory. Cambridge Univ. Press
5. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583-1606
6. Gallovič F, Brokešová J (2007a) Hybrid k - squared source model for strong ground motion simulations: An introduction. Phys Earth Planet Inter 160:34-50, doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2006.09.002
7. Gallovič F, Brokešová J (2007b) Probabilistic aftershock hazard assessment I: Numerical testing of methodological features. J Seismol, doi: 10.1007/s10950-007-9072-0
8. Gerstenberger MC, Wiemer S, Jones LM, Reasenberg PA (2005) Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California. Nature 435:328-331
9. Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment-magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348-2350
10. Ogata Y (1988) Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. J Am Stat Assoc 83:9-27
11. Orgulu G, Aktar M (2001) Regional moment tensor inversion for strong aftershocks of the August 17, 1999 Izmit earthquake (M w = 7.4). Geophys Res Lett 28:371-374
12. Satoh T (2002) Empirical frequency-dependent radiation pattern of the 1998 Miyagiken-Nanbu earthquake in Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1032-1039
13. Shcherbakov R, Turcotte DL (2004) A modified form of Bath's law. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1968-1975
14. Shcherbakov R, Turcotte DL, Rundle JB (2004) A generalized Omori's law for earthquake aftershock decay. Geophys Res Lett 31:L11613, 5 pp
15. Si H, Midorikawa S (1999) New attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and velocity considering effects of fault type and site condition. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 523:63-70
16. Somerville P, Irikura K, Graves R, Sawada S, Wald D, Abrahamson N, Iwasaki Y, Kagawa T, Smith N, Kowada A (1999) Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seismol Res Lett 70:59-80
17. Steacy S, Gomberg J, Cocco M (2005) Introduction to special section: stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time-dependent seismic hazard. J Geophys Res 110:B05S01, 12 pp
18. Wiemer S (2000) Introducing probabilistic aftershock hazard mapping. Geophys Res Lett 27:3405-3408
19. Wiemer S, Katsumata K (1999) Spatial variability of seismicity in aftershock zones. J Geophys Res 104:13135-13151
20. Zeng Y, Anderson JG, Yu G (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophys Res Lett 21:725-728