A modified form of Båth's law

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1968-1975

  Shcherbakov, Robert ^a   Turcotte, Donald L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EARTHQUAKES; EXTRAPOLATION; SEISMOLOGY; SHOCK WAVES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

AFTERSHOCKS; BÅTH'S LAW; CALIFORNIA; STANDARD DEVIATIONS;

SEISMIC PROSPECTING;

AFTERSHOCK; EARTHQUAKE; MAGNITUDE;

EID: 12144283854     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/012003162     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Båth, M. (1965). Lateral inhomogeneities in the upper mantle, Tectonophysics 2, 483-514.
2. Console, R., A. M. Lombardi, M. Murru, and D. Rhoades (2003). Bå th's law and the self-similarity of earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B2, 2128.
3. Das S., and C. H. Scholz (1981). Off-fault aftershock clusters caused by shear stress increase? Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 1669-1675.
4. Frolich, C., and S. D. Davis (1993). Teleseismic b values; or much ado about 1.0, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 631-644.
5. Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter (1954). Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
6. Hardebeck, J. L., J. J. Nazareth, and E. Hauksson (1998). The static stress change triggering model: constraints from two southern California aftershock sequences, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24,427-24,437.
7. Helmstetter, A., and D. Sornette (2003). Båth's law derived from the Gutenberg-Richter law and from aftershock properties, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, no. 20, 2069, doi 10.1029/2003GL018186.
8. Kagan, Y. Y. (2002). Aftershock zone scaling, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 641-655.
9. Kagan, Y. Y., and L. Knopoff (1981). Stochastic synthesis of earthquake catalogs, J. Geophys. Res. 86, no. NB4, 2853-2862.
10. King, G. C. P., R. S. Stein, and J. Lin (1994). Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 935-953.
11. Kisslinger, C. (1996). Aftershocks and fault-zone properties, Adv. Geophys. 38, 1-36.
12. Kisslinger, C., and L. M. Jones (1991). Properties of aftershock sequences in Southern California, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 11,947-11,958.
13. Marcellini, A. (1995). Arrhenius behavior of aftershock sequences, J Geophys. Res. 100, 6463-6468.
14. Mendoza, C., and S. H. Hartzell (1988). Aftershock patterns and main shock faulting, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 78, 1438-1449.
15. Molchan, G. M., and O. E. Dmitrieva (1992). Aftershock identification: methods and new approaches, Geophys. J. Int. 109, 501-516.
16. Ogata, Y. (1988). Statistical models for earthquake occurrence and residual analysis for point processes, J. Am Stat. Assoc. 83, 9-27.
17. Rybicki, K. (1973). Analysis of aftershocks on the basis of dislocation theory, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 7, 409-422.
18. Tsapanos, T. M. (1990). Spatial distribution of the difference between the magnitudes of the main shock and the largest aftershock in the circum-Pacific belt, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1180-1189.
19. Utsu, T. (2002). Relationship between magnitude scales, in International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, W. H. K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P. C. Jennings, and C. Kisslinger (Editors), Part A, Academic Press, Amsterdam, 733-746.
20. Vere-Jones, D. (1969). A note on the statistical interpretation of Båth's law, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 59, 1535-1541.