Consumer acceptance of ingenic foods

Biotechnology Journal

Volumn 1, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1433-1434

  Lusk, Jayson L ^a   Rozan, Anne ^b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Consumer acceptance; Ingenic plants International

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; INGENIC PLANTS INTERNATIONAL; TRANSGENIC PLANTS;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; FRANCE; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FOOD, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; FRANCE; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38349155180     PISSN: 18606768     EISSN: 18607314     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/biot.200600187     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., Allum, N.C., Worlds apart The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science 1999, 285, 384-387.
2. Lusk, J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., Taulman, L., A meta analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. J. Agric. Resource Econ. 2005, 30, 28-44.
3. Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Caswell, M., The first decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States. Economic Information Bulletin, No. 11, April. Economic Research Service/U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2006.
4. Holtorf, H., Guitton, M. C., Reski, R., Plant functional genomics. Naturwissenschaften 2002, 89, 235-249.
5. Rommens, C. M., All-native DNA transformation: A new approach to plant genetic engineering. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 457-464.
6. Nielsen, K. M., Transgenic organisms - Time for conceptual diversification? Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 227-228.
7. Kalaitzandonakes, N., Bijman, J., So who's driving biotech acceptance? Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 336-339.