Validity in hermeneutic phenomenological inquiry: Towards an ethics of evaluation

Canadian Journal of Nursing Research

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 94-115

  Rashotte, Judy ^a   Jensen, Louise ^b  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation criteria; Hermeneutic phenomenological inquiry; Relational ethics; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; EVALUATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMMUNICATION; DISCLOSURE; ETHICS; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 38349147092     PISSN: 08445621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Bochner, A. P. (2002). Criteria against ourselves. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The qualitative inquiry reader (pp. 257-265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Brink, P. J. (1991). Issues of reliability and validity. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (rev. ed.) (pp. 164-185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Brinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2005). Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 157-181.
4. Burns, N. (1989). Standards for qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 2, 44-52.
5. Burns-McCoy, N. (1997). Water is to chocolate like story is to qualitative research: Questioning credibility and narrative studies. Retrieved January 20, 2002, from http://www.lib.wmc.edu/pub/jcp/issueI-2/burns- mccoy.html.
6. Caputo, J. D. (1987). Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7. Chenail, R. J. (2000). Navigating the "seven C's": Curiosity, confirmation, comparison, changing, collaborating, critiquing, and combinations. The qualitative report [Online serial], 4(3/4). Retrieved May 22, 2002, from http://www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR2004-2003/sevencs.html.
8. Christians, C. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 133-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Dahlberg, N. (1995). Qualitative methodology as caring science methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 9, 187-191.
10. Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (1997). A lifeworld paradigm for nursing research. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15(3), 303-317.
11. Davies, D., & Dodd, J. (2002). Qualitative research and the question of rigor. Qualitative Health Research, 12(2), 279-289.
12. Denzin, N. K. (2002). The practices and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 897-922). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Derrida, J. (2002). Différance. In D. Moran &T. Mooney (Eds.), The phenomenological reader (pp. 555-572). New York: Routledge. (Reprinted from Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl's theory of signs, pp. 129-160, D. B. Allison, Trans., 1973, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press)
14. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 107-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Frank, A. (2002). Why study people's stories? The dialogical ethics of narrative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), Article 6. Retrieved January 27, 2002, from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/
16. Fulford, R. (1999). The triumph of narrative. Toronto: Anansi.
17. Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans. & Ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Crossroad. (Original work published 1960)
19. Gadow, S. (1999). Relational narrative: The postmodern turn in nursing ethics. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 13(1), 57-70.
20. Gergen, M., & Gergen, K. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 1025-1046). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Hall, J., & Stevens, P. (1991). Rigor in feminist research. Advanced Nursing Science, 13(3), 16-29.
22. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)
23. hooks, b. (1990). Marginality as a site of resistance. In R. Ferguson, M. Gever, T. T. Minh-ha, & C. West (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures (pp. 341-343). New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art/MIT Press.
24. Jardine, D. (1992). Speaking with a boneless tongue. Bragg Creek, AB: Mākyō Press.
25. Jardine, D. (1998). To dwell with a boundless heart. New York: Peter Lang.
26. Kahn, D. L. (1993). Ways of discussing validity in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 122-126.
27. Knapik, M. (2006). The qualitative research interview: Participants' responsive participation in knowledge making. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), Article 6. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_3/pdf/knapik.pdf.
28. Kvale, S. (2002). The social construction of validity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The qualitative inquiry reader (pp. 299-325). (Reprinted from Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 1995, 19-40)
29. Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63-84.
30. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673-693.
31. Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Lincoln, Y. S. (2002). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The qualitative inquiry reader (pp. 327-345). (Reprinted from Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 1995, 275-289)
33. Lincoln, Y., & Denzin, N. K. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 1047-1065). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. In Y. Lincoln & E. Guba, Naturalistic inquiry (pp. 289-331). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35. Meleis, A. I. (1996). Culturally competent scholarship: Substance and rigor. Advanced Nursing Science, 19(2), 1-16.
36. Minh-ha, T. T. (1989). Woman native other. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), Article 2. Retrieved May 2, 2002, from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/ 1_2Final/html/morse.htm.
38. Moules, N. J. (2002). Hermeneutic inquiry: Paying heed to history and Hermes. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(3), Article 1. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/.
39. Norris, J. (1997). Meaning through form: Alternate modes. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 87-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Olthius, J. (2000). Exclusions and inclusions: Dilemmas of differences. In J. Olthius (Ed.), Towards an ethics of community: Negotiations of difference in a pluralist society (pp. 1-10). Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University.
41. Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic reviews of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341-351.
42. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Russel y Rodriguez, M. (2002). Confronting anthropology's silencing praxis: Speaking of/from a Chicana consciousness. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 1998, 15-40.
44. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advanced Nursing Science, 8(3), 21-31.
45. Sandelowski, M. (1996).Truth/storytelling in nursing inquiry. In J. F. Kikuchi, H. Simmons, & D. Romyn (Eds.), Truth in nursing inquiry (pp. 111-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Sandelowski, M., & Barrosso, J. (2002). Finding the findings in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34, 213-219.
47. Scheurich, J. J. (1997). The masks of validity: A deconstructive investigation. In Research method in the post modern (pp. 80-92). London: Falmer.
48. Shorter, J. (2005). Acknowledging unique others: Ethics, "expressive realism," and social constructivism. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 103-130.
49. Sparkes, A. (2001). Myth 94: Qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 538-552.
50. Taylor, C. (1985). Theories of meaning. In C.Taylor, Human agency and language: Philosophical papers, Vol. 1 (pp. 248-292). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Taylor, C. (1991). The malaise of modernity. Toronto: Anansi.
52. Thorne, S., Reimer Kirkham, S., & O'Flynn-Magee, K. (2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1-17. Retrieved April 23, 2004, from http://www.ualberta.ca/iiqum/backissues/3_1/pdf/thorneetal.pdf.
53. Trumble, W. R., & Stevenson, A. (Eds.). (2002). Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (5th ed.), Vols. 1-20. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Warnke, G. (2002). Hermeneutics, ethics, and politics. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 79-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Watson, C. (2005, April). Living the life of the social inquirer: Beginning educational research [67 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online journal], 6(2), Article 28. Retrieved March 4, 2007, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-05/05-2-28-e.htm.
56. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). On seeking - and rejecting - validity in qualitative research. In H. F. Wolcott, Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation (pp. 337-371).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.