A search for seismic radiation from late slip for the December 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman (Mw = 9.15) earthquake

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 2006, Pages

  Velasco, Aaron A ^a   Ammon, Charles J ^b   Lay, Thorne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DECONVOLUTION; EARTHQUAKES; SEISMIC WAVES; SHOCK WAVES; TECTONICS; TSUNAMIS; GEOPHYSICS; SEISMOLOGY; SURFACE WAVES;

FAULT SLIP; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RADIATION; TSUNAMI EXCITATION MODELS;

SEISMOLOGY; FAULT SLIPS;

BODY WAVE; CORRELATION; DECONVOLUTION; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; FAULT; GEODESY; GREEN FUNCTION; GROUND MOTION; SEISMOLOGY; SLIP; SUBDUCTION ZONE; SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE 2004; WAVE FIELD;

ANDAMAN ISLANDS; CROSS CORRELATIONS; EXCITATION MODELS; GEODETIC OBSERVATION; GROUND MOTIONS; SEISMIC RADIATION; SEISMIC WAVEFIELDS; SUBDUCTION ZONES;

EID: 38349139809     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2006GL027286     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ammon, C. J., et al. (2005), Rupture process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Science, 308, 1133-1139.
2. Banerjee, F., F. Pollitz, and R. Burgmann (2005), The size and duration of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from far-field static offsets, Science, 308, 1769-1772.
3. Bilham, R, (2005), A flying start, then a slow slip, Science, 308, 1126-1127.
4. Bilham, R., R. Engdahl, N. Feldl, and S. P. Satyabala (2005), Partial and complete rupture of the Indo-Andaman plate boundary 1847-2004, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 299-311.
5. de Groot-Hedlin, C. D. (2005), Estimation of the rupture length and velocity of the Great Sumatra earthquake of Dec. 26, 2004 using hydroacoustic signals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L11303, doi:10.1029/2005GL022695.
6. Dziewonski, A. M., and D. L. Anderson (1981), Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25, 297-356.
7. Ekström, G., M. Nettles, and G. A. Abers (2003), Glacial earthquakes, Science, 302, 623-624.
8. w = 9.0 Sumatra earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15310, doi:10.1029 /2005GL022966.
9. Lay, T., et al. (2005), The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004, Science, 308, 1127-1133.
10. Ligorria, J. P., and C. J. Ammon (1999), Iterative deconvolution and receiver function estimation, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 1395-1400.
11. Ni, S., H. Kanamori, and D. Helmberger (2005), Energy radiation from the Sumatra earthquake, Nature, 434, 582.
12. Park, J., et al. (2005a), Performance review of the Global Seismographic Network for the Sumatra-Andaman megathrust earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 331-343.
13. Park, J., et al. (2005b), Earth's free oscillations excited by the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Science, 308, 1139-1344.
14. Song, Y. T., et al. (2005), The 26 December 2004 tsunami source estimated from satellite radar altimetry and seismic waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20601, doi:10.1029/2005GL023683.
15. Subarya, C., et al. (2006), Plate-boundary deformation associated with the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Nature, 440, 46-51.
16. Tsai, V. C., M. Nettles, G. Ekström, and A. M. Dziewonski (2005), Multiple CMT source analysis of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17304, doi:10.1029/2005GL023813.
17. Vigny, C., et al. (2005), Insight into the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in southeast Asia, Nature, 436, 201-206.