Spinal cord is required for proper regeneration of the tail in Xenopus tadpoles

Development Growth and Differentiation

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 109-120

  Taniguchi, Yuka ^a   Sugiura, Takuji ^a,b   Tazaki, Akira ^a,b   Watanabe, Kenji ^a   Mochii, Makoto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HYOGO   (Japan)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fibroblast growth factors; Notochord; Regeneration; Spinal cord; Tail

Indexed keywords

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 10; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDERMIS; HISTOLOGY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; NOTOCHORD; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPINAL CORD; STEM CELL; TADPOLE; TAIL; TISSUE REGENERATION; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTORS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LARVA; NOTOCHORD; REGENERATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPINAL CORD; TAIL; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 38349138850     PISSN: 00121592     EISSN: 1440169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2007.00981.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beck, C. W., Christen, B. Slack, J. M. 2003. Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate. Dev. Cell 5, 429 439.
2. Brockes, J. P. Kintner, C. R. 1986. Glial growth factor and nerve-dependent proliferation in the regeneration blastema of Urodele amphibians. Cell 45, 301 306.
3. Chen, Y., Lin, G. Slack, J. M. 2006. Control of muscle regeneration in the Xenopus tadpole tail by Pax7. Development 133, 2303 2313.
4. Ferretti, P. Geraudie, J. 1998. Cellular and Molecular Basis of Regeneration: from Invertebrates to Humans. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
5. Ferretti, P., Zhang, F., Santos-Ruiz, L. Clarke, J. D. W. 2001. FGF signalling and blastema growth during amphibian tail regeneration. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45, S127 S128.
6. Gargioli, C. Slack, J. M. 2004. Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration. Development 131, 2669 2679.
7. Goldfarb, A. J. 1909. The influence of the nervous system in regeneration. J. Exp. Zool. 7, 643 722.
8. Goss, R. J. 1969. Principles of Regeneration. Academic Press, New York.
9. Hauser, R. 1969. [Dependence of normal tail regeneration in xenopus larvae upon a diencephalic factor in the central canal.] Wilhelm Roux′ Archiv 163, 221 247 (In German with English abstract).
10. Holtzer, S. W. 1956. The inductive activity of the spinal cord in urodele tail regeneration. J. Morph. 99, 1 39.
11. Holtzer, H., Holtzer, S. Avery, G. 1955. An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column. IV. Morphogenesis of tail vertebrae during regeneration. J. Morph. 96, 145 168.
12. Hongo, I., Kengaku, M. Okamoto, H. 1999. FGF signaling and the anterior neural induction in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 216, 561 581.
13. Kintner, C. R. Brockes, J. P. 1984. Monoclonal antibodies identify blastemal cells derived from dedifferentiating limb regeneration. Nature 308, 67 69.
14. Mescher, A. L. 2001. Regeneration: nerve-dependent and nerve-independent. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: ].
15. Mescher, A. L. Gospodarowicz, D. 1979. Mitogenic effect of a growth factor derived from myelin on denervated regenerates of newt forelimbs. J. Exp. Zool. 207, 497 503.
16. Mochii, M., Taniguchi, Y. Shikata, I. 2007. Tail regeneration in the Xenopus tadpole. Dev. Growth Differ. 49, 155 161.
17. Morgan, T. H. Davis, S. E. 1902. The internal factors in the regeneration of the tail of the tadpole. Arch. Entwickelungsmechanik. Organ. 15, 314 318.
18. Mullen, L. M., Bryant, S. V., Torok, M. A., Blumberg, B. Gardiner, D. M. 1996. Nerve dependency of regeneration: the role of Distal-less and FGF signaling in amphibian limb regeneration. Development 122, 3487 3497.
19. Nieuwkoop, P. D. Faber, J. 1956. Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin): a Systematical and Chronological Survey of the Development from the Fertilized Egg Till the End of Metamorphosis. Garland, New York.
20. Roguski, H. 1954. [Effect of the spinal cord on regeneration of the tail in tadpole Xenopus laevis.] Folia Biol. (Krakow) 2, 189 200 (In Polish with English abstract).
21. Roguski, H. 1957. [Influence on the spinal cord on the regeneration of the tail in urodele and anuran larvae.] Folia Biol. (Krakow) 5, 249 266 (In Polish with English abstract).
22. Ruizi Altaba, A. 1992. Planar and vertical signals in the induction and patterning of the Xenopus nervous system. Development 116, 67 80.
23. Schnapp, E., Kragl, M., Rubin, L. Tanaka, E. M. 2005. Hedgehog signaling controls dorsoventral patterning, blastema cell proliferation and cartilage induction during axolotl tail regeneration. Development 132, 3243 3253.
24. Singer, M. 1952. The influence of the nerve in regeneration of the amphibian extremity. Q. Rev. Biol. 27, 169 200.
25. Singer, M., Maier, C. E. McNutt, W. S. 1976. Neurotrophic activity of brain extracts in forelimb regeneration of the urodele, Triturus. J. Exp. Zool. 196, 131 150.
26. Slack, J. M., Beck, C. W., Gargioli, C. Christen, B. 2004. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of regeneration in Xenopus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 745 751.
27. Sugiura, T., Taniguchi, Y., Tazaki, A., Ueno, N., Watanabe, K. Mochii, M. 2004. Differential gene expression between the embryonic tail bud and regenerating larval tail in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Growth Differ. 46, 97 105.
28. Tazaki, A., Kitayama, A., Terasaka, C., Watanabe, K., Ueno, N. Mochii, M. 2005. Macroarray-based analysis of tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis larvae. Dev. Dyn. 233, 1394 1404.
29. Turner, D. L. Weintraub, H. 1994. Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes Dev. 15, 1434 1447.
30. Wang, L., Marchionni, M. A. Tassava, R. A. 2000. Cloning and neuronal expression of a type III newt neuregulin and rescue of denervated, nerve-dependent newt limb blastemas by rhGGF2. J. Neurobiol. 43, 150 158.
31. Watanabe, M., Frelinger, A. L. 3rd Rutishauser, U. 1986. Topography of N-CAM structural and functional determinants. I. Classification of monoclonal antibody epitopes. J. Cell Biol. 103, 1721 1727.
32. Yokoyama, H., Endo, T., Tamura, K., Yajima, H. Ide, H. 1998. Multiple digit formation in Xenopus limb bud recombinants. Dev. Biol. 196, 1 10.
33. Yokoyama, H., Yonei-Tamura, S., Endo, T., Izpisúa Belmonte, J. C., Tamura, K. Ide, H. 2000. Mesenchyme with fgf-10 expression is responsible for regenerative capacity in Xenopus limb buds. Dev. Biol. 219, 18 29.
34. Zhang, F., Clarke, J. D. Ferretti, P. 2000. FGF-2 up-regulation and proliferation of neural progenitors in the regenerating amphibian spinal cord in vivo. Dev. Biol. 225, 381 391.