Evaluation of four elastomeric interucclusal recording materials

Medical Journal Armed Forces India

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 237-240

  Dua, P ^a   Gupta, S H ^b   Ramachandran, S ^c   Sandhu, H S ^d  

^a Department of Prosthodontics   (India)

^b Air Force Institute of Dental Science Bangalore   (India)

^c ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^d 33 Corps Dental Unit   (India)

Author keywords

Articulation; Compressive resistance; Interocclusal records; Linear dimensional change; Occlusion

Indexed keywords

ELASTOMER; POLYETHER; SILICONE;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

EID: 38349128247     PISSN: 03771237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80143-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Yurkstas AA, Kapur KK. Factors influencing centric relation records in edentulous mouths. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 305-10.
2. Wilson PHR, Banerjee A. Recording the retruded contact position: A review of clinical techniques. British Dental Journal 2004; 196: 395-402.
3. Freilich MA, Altieri JV, Wahle JJ. Principles of selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 361-7.
4. Lassila V. Comparison of five interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 59: 215-8.
5. Malone FP, Koth DL. Tylman's theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics. 8th edition. 1997.
6. Millstein PL, Kronman JH, Clark RE. Hydroptic measuring system for testing the accuracy of interocclusal recording mediums. J Dent Res 1970; 49: 462.
7. Millstein PL, Clark RE, Myerson RL. Differential accuracy of silicone-body interocclusal records and associated weight loss due to volatiles. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 33: 649-54.
8. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different record materials. Part I: plaster, impression compound and wax. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 263-9.
9. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different record materials. Part II: Polyether, acrylic resin and corrected wax wafer. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 389-95.
10. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Kinderknecht KE. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 265-70.
11. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE. Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 2th ed. Florida: Mosby Inc, 2006.
12. Dixon DL. Overview of articulation materials and methods for the prosthodontic patient. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 235-47.
13. Tripodakis AP, Vergos VK, Tsoutsos AG. Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 141-6.
14. Fattore L, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B, Hart T. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 152-7.