The literacy practices of recording achievement: How a text mediates between the local and the global

Journal of Education Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 49-62

  Burgess, Amy ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349128186     PISSN: 02680939     EISSN: 14645106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02680930701754088     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adam, B. 1990. Time and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. _. 2000. The temporal gaze: The challenge for social theory in the context of GM food. British Journal of Sociology 51, no 1: 125-42.
3. _. 2004. Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Apple, M. 1981. Curricular form and the logic of technical control. Economic and Industrial Democracy 2: 293-319.
5. Ball, S. 2006. What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. In Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen Ball. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
6. Barton, D. 1994. Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. _. 2001. Directions for literacy research: Analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world. Language and Education 15, nos 2/3: 92-104.
8. Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 1998. Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
9. _. 2005. Literacy, reification and the dynamics of social interaction. In Beyond communities of practice, language, power and social context, ed. D. Barton and K. Tusting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Barton, D., M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanič. 2000. Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
11. Basic Skills Agency (BSA). 2001. The adult literacy core curriculum. London: Basic Skills Agency.
12. Brandt, D., and K. Clinton. 2002. Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research 34, no. 3: 337-56.
13. Clark, R., and R. Ivanič. 1997. The politics of writing. London: Routledge.
14. Darville, R. 2002. Policy, accountability and practice in adult literacy: Sketching an institutional ethnography. In Adult education and the contested terrain of public policy: Proceedings, ed. Shahrzad Mojab and William McQueen. University of Toronto: Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education. http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/CASAE/cnf2002/2002Papers?darville2002w. pdf.
15. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2001. Skills for life: The national strategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills. Nottingham: DfES.
16. _. 2003a. Skills for life: The national strategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills, focus on delivery to 2007. Nottingham: DfES.
17. _. 2003b. Planning learning and recording progress and achievement: A guide for practitioners. London: DfES.
18. DeVault, M. 1999. Institutional ethnography: Strategy for feminist inquiry. In Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
19. Gee, J.P., G. Hull, and C. Lankshear. 1996. The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
20. Grahame, P., and K. Grahame. 2000. Official knowledge and the relations of ruling: Explorations in institutional ethnography. Journal for Pedagogy, Pluralism and Practice 5. http://www.lesley.edu/journals/jppp/5/grahame. html.
21. Hamilton, M. Forthcoming. Putting words in their mouths: The alignment of identities with system goals through the use of individual learning plans. British Educational Research Journal, http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/edres/ staff/hamilton/index.htm.
22. Harker, R., and S. May. 1997. Code and habitus: Comparing the accounts of Bernstein and Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education 14, no. 2: 169-79.
23. Language Awareness. 1999. Special issue: Critical language awareness. 8, no. 2.
24. Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. _. 1996. On interobjectivity. Mind, culture, and activity 3, no. 4: 228-45.
26. Lemke, J. 2000a. Across the scales of time: Artefacts, activities and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity 7, no. 4: 273-90.
27. _. 2000b. Opening up closure: Semiotics across scales. New York Academy of Science Annals 901: 100-11.
28. Massey, D. 2005. For space. London: Sage.
29. Raddon, A. 2007. Timescapes of flexibility and insecurity: Exploring the context of distance learners. Time and Society 16: 61-82.
30. Reflect. 2004. The magazine of the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy. Issue 1, October.
31. Säfström, C.A. 2005. The European knowledge society and the diminishing state control of education: The case of Sweden. Journal of Education Policy 20, no. 5: 583-93.
32. Smith, D. 1988. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
33. _. 1990. Texts, facts and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.
34. Street, B. 1984. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. _. 2003. What's "new" in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education 5, no. 2: 77-91.
36. Tusting, K. 2000. The new literacy studies and time: An exploration. In Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context, ed. D. Barton, M. Hamilton and R. Ivanič. London: Routledge.
37. Walsh, P. 2006. Narrowed horizons and the impoverishment of educational discourse: Teaching, learning and performing under the new educational bureaucracies. Journal of Education Policy 21, no. 1: 95-117.
38. Webb, P.T. 2005. The anatomy of accountability. Journal of Education Policy 20, no. 2: 189-208.
39. _. 2006. The choreography of accountability. Journal of Education Policy 21, no. 2: 201-14.
40. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.