Anti aldol selectivity in a synthetic approach to the C1-C 12 fragment of the tedanolides

Organic Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 137-140

  Jung, Michael E ^a   Zhang, Ting Hu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; KETONE; LACTONE; TEDANOLIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; SPONGE (PORIFERA); STEREOISOMERISM; SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; KETONES; LACTONES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PORIFERA; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 38349125118     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol702729u     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Schmitz, F. J.; Gunasekera, S. P.; Yalamanchili, G.; Hossain, M. B.; van der Helm, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7251.
2. Fusetani, N.; Sugawara, T.; Matsunaga, S.; Hirota, H. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4971.
3. (a) Total synthesis of tedanolide: Ehrlich, G.; Hassfeld, J.; Eggert, U.; Kalesse, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14038.
4. (b) Synthetic study of tedanolide: Iwata, Y.; Tanino, K.; Miyashita, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2341.
5. Ehrlich, G.; Kalesse, M. Synlett 2005, 655.
6. Hassfeld, J.; Kalesse, M. Synlett 2002, 2007.
7. Roush, W. R.; Newcom, J. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4739.
8. Taylor, R. E.; Hearn, B. R.; Ciavarri, J. P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2953.
9. Loh, T.-P.; Feng, L.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6001.
10. Loh, T.-P.; Feng, L.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3223.
11. Smith, A. B.; Lodise, S. A. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1249.
12. Roush, W. R.; Lane, G. C. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 95.
13. (a) Jung, M. E.; Lee, C. P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 333.
14. (b) Jung, M. E.; Lee, C. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9719.
15. (c) Jung, M. E.; Marquez, R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1669.
16. (d) Jung, M. E.; Marquez, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3129.
17. (e) Jung, M. E.; Karama, U.; Marquez, R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 663.
18. (a) Jung, M. E.; Yoo, D. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3543-3546.
19. (b) Jung, M. E.; Yoo, D. Tetrahedron Lett. In press.
20. (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Banno, K.; Narasaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7503. For reviews, see:
21. (b) Chan, T.-H. Formation and Addition Reactions of Enol Ethers. In Comp. Org. Synth. 1991, Ch. 2.3, 595.
22. (c) Gennari, C. Asymmetric Synthesis with Enol Ethers. In Comp. Org. Synth. 1991, Ch. 2.4, 629.
23. Ethylmagnesium bromide was added to the aldehyde 8 followed by Dess-Martin oxidation to the ketone. Reductive ring-opening with zinc in acetic acid and silylation of the diol with TBSCl gave 7.
24. (a) Heathcock, C. H.; Davidsen, S. K.; Hug, K. T.; Flippin, L. A. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 3027.
25. (b) Reetz, M. T.; Kesselet, K.; Jung, A. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 4327.
26. Xie, L. F.; Vanlandeghem, K.; Isenberger, K. M.; Bernier, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 641.
27. Extensive decoupling experiments were carried out to ensure the identity of the indicated protons in all the acetonides.
28. Cazeau, P.; Duboudin, F.; Moulines, F.; Babot, O.; Dunogues, J. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 2088.
29. Denmark, S. E.; Fujimori, S.; Pham, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10823.
30. These calculations were done on a simpler model system where the enol silyl ether was replaced by an enol, the OTBDPS group by an OH, and the OBn by an OMe group with the R group being ethyl (R = Et).