Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: No good genes?

Genetica

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 287-294

  Rodríguez Muñoz, Rolando ^a   Bretman, Amanda ^a   Hadfield, Jarrod D ^b   Tregenza, Tom ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Condition dependence; Dominance; Epistasis; Genetic compatibility; Mate choice; Polyandry

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS BIMACULATUS;

EID: 38349114854     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9172-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adamo SA, Hoy RR (1994) Mating-behavior of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus and its dependence on social and environmental cues. Anim Behav 47:857-868
2. Adamo SA, Hoy RR (1995) Agonistic behaviour in male and female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, and how behavioural context influences its expression. Anim Behav 49:1491-1501
3. Ashworth JR, Wall R (1994) Responses of the sheep blowflies Lucilia sericata and L. cuprina to odor and the development of semiochemical baits. Med Vet Entom 8:303-309
4. Bateman PW (1998) Mate preference for novel partners in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Ecol Ent 23:473-475
5. Bateman PW, Gilson LN, Ferguson JWH (2001) Male size and sequential mate preference in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav 61:631-637
6. Bégin M, Roff DA (2002) The common quantitative genetic basis of wing morphology and diapause occurrence in the cricket Gryllus veletis. Heredity 89:473-479
7. Bretman A, Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Tregenza T (2006) Male dominance determines female egg laying rate in crickets. Biol Lett 2:409-411
8. Bretman A, Tregenza T (2005) Measuring polyandry in wild populations: a case study using promiscuous crickets. Mol Ecol 14:2169-2179
9. Bretman A, Wedell N, Tregenza T (2004) Molecular evidence of post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:159-164
10. Chen PS, Stummzollinger E, Aigaki T et al (1988) A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 54:291-298
11. Christe P, Møller AP, Saino N et al (2000) Genetic and environmental components of phenotypic variation in immune response and body size of a colonial bird, Delichon urbica (the house martin). Heredity 85:75-83
12. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1995) Dominance variance-associations with selection and fitness. Heredity 75:530-540
13. Czesak ME, Fox CW (2003) Genetic variation in male effects on female reproduction and the genetic covariance between the sexes. Evolution 57:1359-1366
14. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, New York
15. Gray DA, Eckhardt G (2001) Is cricket courtship song condition dependent? Anim Behav 62:871-877
16. Grill CP, Moore AJ, Brodie ED (1997) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity in a colonizing population of the ladybird beetle, Harmonia axyridis. Heredity 78:261-269
17. Heifetz Y, Lung O, Frongillo EA et al (2000) The Drosophila seminal fluid protein Acp26Aa stimulates release of oocytes by the ovary. Curr Biol 10:99-102
18. Herndon LA, Chapman T, Kalb JM et al (1997) Mating and hormonal triggers regulate accessory gland gene expression in male drosophila. J Insect Physiol 43:1117-1123
19. Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204
20. Khazraïe K, Campan M (1999) The role of prior agonistic experience in dominance relationships in male crickets Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behav Process 44:341-348
21. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
22. Merila J, Sheldon BC (1999) Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83:103-109
23. Mezey JG, Houle D (2005) The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:1027-1038
24. Morrow EH, Gage MJG (2001) Artificial selection and heritability of sperm length in Gryllus bimaculatus. Heredity 87:356-362
25. Pomiankowski A, Møller AP (1995) A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc R Soc Lond B 260:21-29
26. Réale D, Roff DA (2002) Quantitative genetics of oviposition behaviour and interactions among oviposition traits in the sand cricket. Anim Behav 64:397-406
27. Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1415-1421
28. Sakai M, Taoda Y, Mori K et al (1991) Copulation sequence and mating termination in the male cricket gryllus-bimaculatus degeer. J Insect Physiol 37:599-615
29. Simmons LW (1986) Intermale competition and mating success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim Behav 34:567-579
30. Simmons LW (1987a) Female choice contributes to offspring fitness in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:313-321
31. Simmons LW (1987b) Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:129-133
32. Simmons LW (1987c) Sperm competition as a mechanism of female choice in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:197-202
33. Simmons LW (1988a) The contribution of multiple mating and spermatophore consumption to the lifetime reproductive success of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). Ecol Ent 13:57-69
34. Simmons LW (1988b) Male size, mating potential and lifetime reproductive success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim Behav 36:372-379
35. Simons AM, Roff DA (1994) The effect of environmental variability on the heritabilities of traits of a field cricket. Evolution 48:1637-1649
36. Tachon G, Murray AM, Gray DA et al (1999) Agonistic displays and the benefits of fighting in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Behav 12:533-543
37. Tomkins JL, Radwan J, Kotiaho JS et al (2004) Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19:323-328
38. Tregenza T, Wedell N (1997) Definitive evidence for cuticular pheromones in a cricket. Anim Behav 54:979-984
39. Tregenza T, Wedell N (1998) Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726-1730
40. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Mol Ecol 9:1013-1027
41. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71-73
42. Wade MJ (2002) A gene's eye view of epistasis, selection and speciation. J Evol Biol 15:337-346
43. Wedell N, Tregenza T (1999) Successful fathers sire successful sons. Evolution 53:620-625