Experimental multi-level seismic performance assessment of 3D RC frame designed for damage avoidance

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-20

  Bradley, Brendon A ^a   Dhakal, Rajesh P ^a   Mander, John B ^a   Li, Louman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Damage avoidance design; Incremental dynamic analysis; Multi level seismic performance assessment; Quasi earthquake displacement tests

Indexed keywords

COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); CONCRETE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; CRACKS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN;

DAMAGE AVOIDANCE DESIGN; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; MULTI-LEVEL SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUASI-EARTHQUAKE DISPLACEMENT TESTS;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

CRACKING; DISPLACEMENT; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; GROUND MOTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARD; SPALLING; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 38349112626     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.741     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Housner GW. The behaviour of inverted pendulum structure during earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1963; 53(2):403-417.
2. Cheok GS, Lew HS. Performance of precast concrete beam to column connections subject to cyclic loading. PCI Journal 1991; 36(3):56-67.
3. Cheok GS, Lew HS. Model precast concrete beam-to-column connections subject to cyclic loading. PCI Journal 1993; 38(4):80-92.
4. Priestley MJN, Tao JRT. Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frames with partially debonded tendons. PCI Journal 1993; 38(1):58-69.
5. Stone WC, Cheok GS, Stanton JF. Performance of hybrid moment-resisting precast beam-column concrete connection subjected to cyclic loading. ACI Journal 1995; 92(2):229-249.
6. Priestley MJN, Sritharan S, Conley JR, Pampanin S. Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-storey precast concrete test building. PCI Journal 1999; 44(6):43-67.
7. Mander JB, Cheng CT. Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design. Technical Report NCEER-97-0014, National Centre of Earthquake Engineering Research, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, U.S.A., 1997.
8. Solberg K, Mashiko N, Dhakal RP, Mander JB. Performance of a damage-protected highway bridge pier subjected to bi-directional earthquake attack. Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM19), Christchurch, New Zealand, 2006; 437-442.
9. Hamid NBA, Mander JB. Experimental study on bi-lateral seismic performance of precast hollow core wall using shaking table. Proceedings of the 10th East Asia and Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC10), vol. 7, Bangkok, Thailand, 2006.
10. Holden TJ, Restrepo JI, Mander JB. Seismic performance of precast reinforced and prestressed concrete walls. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129(3):286-296.
11. Li L. Further experiments on damage avoidance design of beam-to-column joints. ME Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2006. (Available from: http:// Iibrary.canterbury.ac.nz/etd/adt-NZCU20060828.153252.)
12. Arnold DM. Development and experimental testing of a seismic damage-avoidance designed beam to column connection utilising draped unbonded post-tensioning. ME Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2004.
13. Dhakal RP, Mander JB, Mashiko N. Identification of critical earthquakes for seismic performance assessment of structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(8):989-1008.
14. Bull D, Brunsdon D. Examples of Concrete Structural Design to New Zealand Standard NZS3101. Cement and Concrete Association of New Zealand (CCANZ), New Zealand, 1998.
15. Standards New Zealand. NZS 3101: Part 1: 1995: Concrete Structures Standard. Standards, New Zealand, Wellington, 1995.
16. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:491-514.
17. SAC Steel Project. Earthquake Ground Motions for the Analysis of Steel Structures. SAC Steel Project. Los Angeles Earthquake Ground Motions with 10% Probability of Exceedance in 50 years. (Available from: http://nisee.berkeley.edu/data/strong_motion/sacsteel/motions/ la10in50yr.html.)
18. SAC Steel Project. Earthquake Ground Motions for the Analysis of Steel Structures. SAC Steel Project. Los Angeles Earthquake Ground Motions with 2% Probability of Exceedance in 50 years. (Available from: http://nisee.berkeley.edu/data/strong_motion/sacsteel/motions /la2in50yr.html.)
19. Carr AJ. Ruaumoko3D: inelastic dynamic computer program. Computer Program Library, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2004.
20. Pampanin S, Priestley NJ, Sritharan S. Analytical modelling of the seismic behaviour of precast concrete frames designed with ductile connections. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2001; 5(3):329-367.