Identification of critical ground motions for seismic performance assessment of structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 989-1008

  Dhakal, Rajesh P ^a   Mander, John B ^a   Mashiko, Naoto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Confidence bounds; Critical ground motions; Design Basis Earthquake (DBE); Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA); Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE); Performance Based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE); Pseudodynamic test; Seismic performance assessment; Time history analysis

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PIERS; PROBABILITY; SEISMOLOGY;

CONFIDENCE BOUNDS; CRITICAL GROUND MOTIONS; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE; PERFORMANCE BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PSEUDODYNAMIC TEST;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND MOTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 33745600822     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.568     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ACI ITG/T1.1-99. Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing. ACI Provisional Standard. American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, U.S.A., 1999.
2. ATC24. Guidelines for Cyclic Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures. Applied Technology Council: California, 1992; 57.
3. Park R. Evaluation of ductility of structures assemblages from laboratory testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering 1989; 22(3):155-166.
4. Lukkunaprasit P, Thepmangkorn J. Load history effect on cyclic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(10):1629-1633.
5. Ingham JM, Liddell D, Davidson B. Influence of loading history on the response of a reinforced concrete beam. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering 2001; 34(2):107-124.
6. Takanashi K, Udagawa M, Seki M, Okada T, Tanaka H. Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer-actuator on-line system. Bulletin of Earthquake Resistant Structural Research Centre, vol. 8, University of Tokyo, 1975.
7. Mutsuyoshi H, Machida A, Tanzo W, Mashiko N. Inelastic seismic response of RC bridge pier using pseudodynamic test method. Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute 1994; 16:265 272.
8. Shing PB, Nakashima M, Bursi OS. Application of pseudodynamic test method to structural research. Earthquake Spectra 1996; 12(1):29-56.
9. Iervolino I, Cornell CA. Record selection for nonlinear analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(3):685-713.
10. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(2):523-553.
11. Yun SY, Hamburger RO, Cornell CA, Foutch DA. Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(4):534-545.
12. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(4):526-533.
13. FEMA. Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded steel moment frame buildings. Report No. FEMA-351, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, 2000.
14. NZS3101-95. Concrete Structures Standard: NZS3101. Standards New Zealand: Wellington, 1995.
15. Carr AJ. RUAUMOKO: inelastic dynamic computer program. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand; 2004.
16. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazurro P, Carballo JE. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998; 14(3):469-500.
17. Mander JB, Basoz N. Seismic fragility curve theory for highway bridges in transportation lifeline loss estimation. Optimizing Post-Earthquake Lifeline System Reliability, TCLEE Monograph No. 16. American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, U.S.A., 1999; 31-40.
18. Hayakawa R, Kawashima K, Watanabe G. Effect of bilateral loadings on the flexural strength and ductility of reinforced concrete bridge piers. Japan Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 27:1-4 (in Japanese).