Separately together: Working reflexively as a team

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 45-61

  Siltanen, Janet ^a   Willis, Alette ^c   Scobie, Willow ^b  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349103406     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570701622116     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Al-Hindi, K. F., & Kawabata, H. (2002). Toward a more fully reflexive feminist geography. In P. Moss (Ed.), Feminist geography in practice: Research and methods (pp. 103-115). Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology-NEW vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
3. Backett-Milburn, K., Mauthner, N., & Parry, O. (1999). The importance of the conditions and relations of project design for the construction of qualitative data: Some experiences from collaborative teamworking. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2, 297-312.
4. Barry, C. A. (2003). Holding up a mirror to widen the view: Multiple subjectivities in the reflexive team. In L. Finlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity - A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences (pp. 214-228). Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Breuer, F., & Roth, W.-M. (2003). Subjectivity and reflexivity in the social sciences: Epistemic windows and methodological consequences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2).
6. Calhoun, C. (1992). Culture, history and the problem of specificity in social theory. In S. Seidmand & D. G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory (pp. 244-288). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
7. Calhoun, C. (1995). Critical social theory-Culture, history and the challenge of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Campbell, K. (2004). The promise of feminist reflexi vities: Developing Donna Haraway's project for feminist science studies. Hypatia, 19, 162-182.
9. Collins, P. H. (1991). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology-Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 35-59). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10. Davies, C. A. (1999). Reflexive ethnography - A guide to researching selves and others. London: Routledge.
11. Doucet, A. (1998). Interpreting mother-work: Linking methodology, ontology, theory and personal biography. Canadian Women's Studies, 18, 52-58.
12. Erickson, K. C., & Stull, D. D. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Warnings and advice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Fawcett, B., & Hearn, J. (2004). Researching others: Epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7, 201-218.
14. Findlay, L. (2003). The reflexive journey: Mapping multiple routes. In L. Findlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity - A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences (pp. 3-20). Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Findlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity - a practical guide for researchers in health and social science. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter-Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (2005). Feminist methodology: New applications in the academy and public policy. Signs, 30(4), 2211-2236.
18. Gibson-Graham, J.-K. (1994). 'Stuffed if I know!' Reflections on post-modern feminist social research. Gender, Place and Culture, 1, 205-224.
19. Gough, B. (2003). Deconstructing reflexivity. In L. Findlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity - A practicalguidefor researchers in health and social sciences (pp. 21-36). Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research-Theories and issues. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 195-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women-The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
22. Hekman, S. (1997). Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 22, 341-366.
23. Holland, R. (1999). Reflexivity. Human Relations, 52(4), 463-484.
24. Jackson, P. (2001). Making sense of qualitative data. In M. Limb & C. Dwyer (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers (pp. 199-214). London: Arnold.
25. Marcus, G. E. (1998). What comes (just) after 'post'? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denizen & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research-Theories and issues (pp. 383-406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Martin, J. R. (1994). Methodological essentialism, false difference and other dangerous traps. Signs, 19, 630-657.
27. Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity. Sociology, 37, 413-431.
28. May, T. (1999). Reflexivity and sociological practice. Sociological Research Online, 4(3).
29. May, T. (2000). Reflexivity in social life and sociological practice: A rejoinder to Roger Slack. Sociological Research Online, 5(1).
30. McCorkel, J. A., & Myers, K. (2003). What difference does difference make? Position and privilege in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 199-228.
31. Naples, N. A. (2003). Feminism and method-Ethnography, discourse analysis and activist research. New York: Routledge.
32. Nelson, L. H. (1993). Epistemological communities. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 121-159). New York: Routledge.
33. Olesen, V., Droes, N., Hatton, D., Chico, N., & Schatzman, L. (1994). Analyzing together: Recollections of a team approach. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 111-128). London: Routledge.
34. Ribbens, J., & Edwards, R. (1998). Epilogue. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research (pp. 203-206). London: Sage.
35. Richards, L. (1999). Qualitative teamwork: Making it work. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 7-10.
36. Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305-320.
37. Russell, G. M., & Kelly, N. H. (2002). Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3).
38. Siltanen, J. (2007). Social citizenship and the transformation of work. In V. Shalla & W. Clement (Eds.), Work in tumultuous times (pp. 349-379). Montreal: McGill-Queen's.
39. Siltanen, J., Scobie, W., & Willis, A. (2006a). Flexible, branché et dans un cul-de-sac!: Les inégalités stratégiques dans la négociation du changement au travail [Flexible, networked and going nowhere! Strategic inequalities in the negotiation of work change]. In J.-L. Klein & D. Harrisson (Eds.), L'innovation sociale [Social Innovation], (pp. 193-205) Quebec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
40. Siltanen, J., Scobie, W., & Willis, A. (2006b). (under review). Flows, scrambles, eddies and whirlpools-Inequality and the experience of work change in the new economy.
41. Slack, R. (2000). Reflexivity or sociological practice: A reply to May. Sociological Research Online, 5(1).
42. Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Weston, C., Gandell, T., Beauchamp, J., McAlpine, L., Wiseman, C., & Beauchamp, C. (2001). Analyzing interview data: The development and evolution of a coding system. Qualitative Sociology, 24(3), 381-400.
44. Wolf, D. L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1-55). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45. Yeatman, A. (1994). Postmodern revisionings of the political. New York: Routledge.