The importance of the conditions and relations of project design for the construction ofqualitativ e data: Some experiences from collaborative teamw orking

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 297-312

  Backett Milburn, Kathryn ^a   Mauthner, Natasha ^b   Parry, Odette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011164260     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/136455799294970     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Backett-Milburn, K., Parry, O. and Mauthner, N. (1999) I’ll worry about that when it comes along’: osteoporosis, a meaningful issue for women at mid-life? Health Education Research: Theory and Practice (in press).
2. Black, N. (1994) Why we need qualitative research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 48, 425-426.
3. Boulton, M. and Fitzpatrick, R. (1997) Evaluating qualitative research. Evidence-B ased Health Policyand Management, December, 83-85.
4. Bowles, G. and Duelli Klein, R. (eds) (1983) Theories of Women’s Studies (London: Routledge).
5. BSA Medical Sociology Group (1996) Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. (Durham: British Sociological Association).
6. Daly, J. Caught in the web: the social construction of menopause as disease. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psy chology, 13, 115-126.
7. Dowell, J., Huby, G, and Smith, C. (1995) Scottish consensus statement on qualitative research in Primary Care. (Dundee: Tay side Centre for Primary Care).
8. Harding, S. (1992) Whose S cience? Whose Knowledge. (Milton Keynes: Routledge).
9. HEA (1998) Can qualitative evaluation studies contribute to the quest for evidence of effectivenes s in health promotion -a multi-disciplinary approach. Proceedings from an expert meeting. (London: Health Education Authority).
10. K lein, R. and Dumble, L. (1994) Disempowering midlife women: the science and politics of hormone replacement therapy. Women’s International F orum. 17, 327-343.
11. K omaseroff, P. Rothfield. P. and Daly. J. (eds) (1997) Reinterpreting Menopause: Cultural and Philosophical I ssues. (London: Routledge).
12. Mauthner, N., Parry, O. and Backett-Milburn, K. (1998) The data are out there or are they ? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data. Sociology, 32, 733-745.
13. Miller, G and Dingwall, R. (1997) Context and Method in Qualitative Research. (London: Sage).
14. Popay, J., Rogers, A. and Williams, G. (1997) Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Public Health Research and Resource Centre, University of Salford.
15. Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. (eds) (1998) Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives. (London: Sage).
16. Rogers, A., Popay, J., Williams, G. and Latham, M. (1997) Setting standards for qualitative research: the development of markers. Part Two of Inequalities in Health and Health Promotion: Insights from the Qualitative Research Literature. (London: Health Education Authority).
17. Secker, J., Wimbush, E., Watson, J. and Milburn, K. (1995) The use of qualitative methods in health promotion research: some criteria for quality. Health Education Journal, 54, 74-87.
18. Stanley, L. and Wise, S. (1993) Breaking Out Again: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
19. Vidich, A. J. and Lyman, S. M. (1998) Qualitative methods: their history in Sociology and Anthropology. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) The Landscape of Qualitative Research. (London: Sage) pp. 41-110.
20. Wolf, D. (1996) Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D.L Wolf (ed.) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. (Boulder, Colo: Westview Press).