Bone response to endosseous titanium implants surface-modified by blasting and chemical treatment: A histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 400-407

  Park, Jin Woo ^a   Jang, Il Sung ^a   Sun, Jo Young ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Histomorphometry; Osseointegration; Surface modification; Surface topography; Titanium implants

Indexed keywords

BONE; POROUS MATERIALS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

CHEMICAL TREATMENT; HISTOMORPHOMETRY; MICROROUGHENED SURFACES;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

HYDROXYAPATITE; OXIDE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HEALING; IMPLANT; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BONE SCREWS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; FEMUR; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RABBITS; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 38349098749     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30884     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4.
2. Davies JE. Mechanism of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
3. Lossdorfer S, Schwartz Z, Wang L, Lohmann CH, Turner JD, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;70:361-369.
4. Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Magnin G, Bernard JP. Biological properties of acid etched titanium surface: Effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;68:149-159.
5. de Maeztu MA, Alava JI, Gay-Escoda C. Ion implantation: Surface treatment for improving the bone integration of titanium and Ti6A14V implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:57-62.
6. Nishiguchi S, Fujibayashi S, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Biology of alkali- and heat-treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:26-35.
7. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee IS, Kim HE. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:809-818.
8. Albrektsson T. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A case against their use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:1312-1326.
9. Hanisch O, Cortella CA, Boskovic MM, James RA, Slots J, Wikesjo UM. Experimental peri-implant tissue breakdown around hydroxyapatite-coated implants. J Periodontol 1997;68:59-66.
10. Morscher EW, Hefti A, Aebi U. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:267-272.
11. Wei M, Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Apatite forming ability of CaO-containing titania. Biomaterials 2002;23:167-172.
12. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Roser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:1025-1031.
13. Peltola T, Patsi M, Rahiala H, Kangasniemi I, Yli-Urpo A. Calcium phosphate induction by sol-gel-derived titania coatings on titanium substrates in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:504-510.
14. Li P, Ohtsuki C, Kokubo T, Nakanishi K, Soga N, de Groot K. The role of hydrated silica, titania, and alumina in inducing apatite on implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:7-15.
15. 5-treated titanium after subsequent heat treatments. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:171-176.
16. 2,-, and NaOH-treated titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:172-178.
17. Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T. Effect of water treatment on the apatite-forming ability of NaOH-treated titanium metal. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:522-530.
18. Yan WQ, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T. Bonding of chemically treated titanium implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:267-275.
19. Xue W, Liu X, Zheng X, Ding C. In vivo evaluation of plasma-sprayed wollastonite coating. Biomaterials 2005;26:3455-3460.
20. Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Albandar JM, Hall J, Wikesjo UM. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite™) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:105-111.
21. Xiropaidis AV, Qahash M, Lim WH, Shanaman RH, Rohrer MD, Wikesjo UME, Hall J. Bone-implant contact at calcium phosphate-coated and porous titanium oxide (TiUnite™)-modified oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:532-539.
22. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:120-128.
23. 2 blasting - Tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials 2002;23:4211-4219.
24. 2 on titanium implant surfaces on functional attachment in bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:524-530.
25. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol J. A histomorphometric study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
26. 3. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:251-260.
27. Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughness. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:11-19.
28. Fini M, Giavaresi G, Greggi T, Martini L, Aldini NN, Parisini P, Giardino R. Biological assessment of the bone-screw interface after insertion of uncoated and hydroxyapatite-coated pedicular screws in osteopenic sheep. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:176-183.
29. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Cascardo G, Mazzucco L, Borzini P, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R. Collagen I-coated titanium surfaces: mesenchymal cell adhesion and in vivo evaluation in trabecular bone implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:449-458.
30. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2003;24:2161-2175.
31. Liang B, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Tamura J, Kim HM, Uchida M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Histological and mechanical investigation of the bone-bonding ability of anodically oxidized titanium in rabbits. Biomaterials 2003;24:4959-4966.
32. Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T, Shigeru S, Tamura J, Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T. Bioactive titanium: Effect of sodium removal on the bone-bonding ability of bioactive titanium prepared by alkali and heat treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;56:562-570.
33. Feng B, Chen JY, Qi SK, He L, Zhao JZ, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and bioactivity. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:457-464.
34. Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 2004;25:1003-1010.
35. Wang XX, Yan W, Hayakawa S, Tsuru K, Osaka A. Apatite deposition on thermally and anodically oxidized titanium surfaces in a simulated body fluid. Biomaterials 2003;24:4631-4671.
36. Elias KE, Price RL, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials 2000;23:3279-3287.
37. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6A14V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004;25:4731-4739.
38. de Oliveira PT, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004;25:403-413.
39. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:2-8.
40. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinmann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
41. 2-grit blasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: Part 2. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:314-324.
42. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: Four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:193-200.
43. Warme BA, Epstein NJ, Trindade MC, Miyanishi K, Ma T, Saket RR, Regula D, Goodman SB, Smith RL. Proinflammatory mediator expression in a novel murine model of titanium-particle-induced intramedullary inflammation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:360-366.
44. Wang ML, Sharkey PF, Tuan RS. Particle bioreactivity and wear-mediated osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:1028-1038.
45. Chen FS, Scher DM, Clancy RM, Vera-Yu A, Di Cesare PE. In vitro and in vivo activation of polymorphonuclear leucocytes in response to particulate debris. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:904-912.
46. Kovacik MW, Gradisar IA, Sylvester AM, Haprian JJ, Alexander TS. A comparison of interleukin-1 beta in human synovial fluid of osteoarthritic and revision total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Sci Instrum 1997;33:519-523.
47. Ohlin A, Johnell O, Lerner UH. The pathogenesis of loosening of total hip arthroplasties. The production of factors by periprosthetic tissues that stimulate in vitro bone resorption. Clin Orthop 1990;253:287-296.
48. Yao J, Glant TT, Lark MW, Mikecz K, Jacobs JJ, Hutchinson NI, Hoerrner LA, Kuettner KE, Galante JO. The potential role of fibroblasts in periprosthetic osteolysis: Fibroblast response to titanium particles. J Bone Mineral Res 1995;10:1417-1427.
49. Thomsen P, Johansson CB. A selection of oral implant materials based on experimental studies. In: Ellingsen JE, Lyngstadaas SP, editors. Bio-Implant Interface: Improving Biomaterials and Tissue Reactions. Florida: CRC Press; 2003. pp 183-203.
50. Franchi M, Bacchelli B, Martini D, De Pasquale V, Orsini E, Ottani V, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R, Ruggeri A. Early detachment of titanium particles from various different surfaces of endosseous dental implants. Biomaterials 2004;25:2239-2246.