Wavefront-guided excimer laser ablation using photorefractive keratectomy and sub-Bowman's keratomileusis: A contralateral eye study

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Durrie, Daniel S ^a,d   Slade, Stephen G ^b,d   Marshall, John ^c,e  

^a Durrie Vision   (United States)

^b Slade and Baker Vision Center   (United States)

^c ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d ALCON RESEARCH LTD   (United States)

^e Advanced Medical Optics IntraLase Corp

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ANALYZER; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EXCIMER LASER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETER; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; RETINA IMAGE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 38349098739     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20080101-14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Randleman JB, Loft ES, Banning CS, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Outcomes of wavefront-optimized surface ablation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:983-988.
2. McDonald M. A return to PRK. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today. 2007;7:75-77.
3. Gayton JL. Point/counterpoint: LASIK versus surface ablation. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today. 2006;6:75-76.
4. Yang XJ, Yan HT, Nakahori Y. Evaluation of the effectiveness of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: a meta-analysis. J Med Invest. 2003;50:180-186.
5. Neeracher B, Senn P, Schipper I. Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1696-1701.
6. Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:120-126.
7. Kato N, Toda I, Hori-Komai Y, Sakai C, Tsubota K. Five-year outcome of LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology. 2007 Sept 25 (epub ahead of publication).
8. Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z, Garufis C, Duh YJ, Soltes CR, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap ereation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:97-105.
9. Binder PS. One thousand consecutive IntraLase laser in situ keratomileusis flaps. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:962-969.
10. Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:804-811.
11. Walker MB, Wilson SE. Lower intraoperative flap complication rate with the Hansatome microkeratome compared to the Automated Corneal Shaper. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:79-82.
12. Van de Pol C, Greig JL, Estrada A, Bissette GM, Bower KS. Visual and flight performance recovery after PRK or LASIK in helicopter pilots. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78:547-553.
13. Walker MB, Wilson SE. Recovery of uncorrected visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia. Cornea. 2001;20:153-155.
14. Shortt AJ, Bunce C, Allan BD. Evidence for superior efficacy and safety of LASIK over photorefractive keratectomy for correction of myopia. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1897-1908.
15. Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, Durrie DS, Gordon M, Michelson MA, Thompson VM, Berkeley RB, Schein OD, Steinert RF. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized, prospective study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1512-1522.
16. Yang XJ, Yan HT, Nakahori Y. Evaluation of the effectiveness of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: a meta-analysis. J Med Invest. 2003;50:180-186.
17. Pirouzian A, Thornton J, Ngo S. One-year outcomes of a bilateral randomized prospective clinical trial comparing laser subepithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:575-579.
18. Tobaigy FM, Ghanem RC, Sayegh RR, Hallak JA, Azar DT. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:901-908.
19. O'Doherty M, Kirwan C, O'Keeffe M, O'Doherty J. Postoperative pain following epi-LASIK, LASEK and PRK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:133-138.
20. Torres LF, Sancho C, Tan B, Padilla K, Schanzlin DJ, Chayet AS. Early postoperative pain following epi-LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, comparative, bilateral study. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:126-132.
21. De Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA, Sanchez-Pina JM, Hernandez-Vedejo JL. Comparison between LASEK and LASIK for correction of low myopia. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:139-145.
22. Chung SH, Lee IS, Lee YG, Lee HK, Kim EK, Yoon G, Seo KY. Comparison of higher order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:779-784.
23. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
24. Netto MV, Mohan RR, Ambrosio R Jr, Hutcheon AE, Zieske JD, Wilson SE. Wound healing in the cornea: a review of refractive surgery complications and new prospects for therapy. Cornea. 2005;24:509-522.
25. Dupps WJ, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:709-720.
26. Alió JL. Aberrometric outcomes and very high-frequency digital ultrasound evaluation of the flap thickness profile in LASIK surgery using three different methods of lamellar keratotomy. Presented at: 5th International Congress on Epi-LASIK and LASEK and Advanced Surface Ablation; September 8, 2006; London, United Kingdom.
27. Güell JL, Pujol J, Arjona M, Diaz-Douton F, Artal P. Optical Quality Assessment System, Instrument for an objective clinical evaluation of the ocular optical quality. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1598-1599.
28. PASCAL product brochure. Port, Switerzland: Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG; 3-4.
29. Pallikaris IG. Keynote Presentation: From LASIK to Epi-LASIK to SBK. Does it make sense? Presented at: Sixth International Congress on Advanced Surface Ablation & SBK; May 5, 2007; Ft Lauderdale, Fla.
30. Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim TI, Choi HJ, Pak JH, Tchah H. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:599-604.
31. Stahl JE, Durrie DS, Schwendeman FJ, Boghossian AJ. Anterior segment OCT analysis of thin IntraLase femtosecond flaps. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:555-558.
32. Porter J, MacRae S, Yoon G, Roberts C, Cox IG, Williams DR. Separate effects of the microkeratome incision and laser ablation on the eye's wave aberration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:327-337.