Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1696-1701

  Neeracher, Barbara ^a   Senn, Peter ^a   Schipper, Isaak ^a  

^a LUZERNER KANTONSSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLARE; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SWITZERLAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLARE; HUMANS; KERATECTOMY, PHOTOREFRACTIVE, EXCIMER LASER; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUPIL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 4143051446     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.058     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Rashid E.R., Waring G.O. III Complications of refractive keratotomy. Waring G.O. III Refractive Keratotomy for Myopia and Astigmatism. 1992;863-936 Mosby, St Louis, MO
2. Krueger RR, Seiler T. PRK postoperative and complications management. In: Talamo JH, Krueger RR, eds, The Excimer Manual; a Clinicians' Guide to Excimer Laser Surgery. Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Co, 1997; 121-170
3. Niesen U., Businger U., Hartmann P., et al. Glare sensitivity and visual acuity after excimer laser photorefracive keratectomy for myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 81:1997;136-140
4. Gartry D.S., Kerr Muir M.G., Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy with an argon fluoride excimer laser. a clinical study Refract Corneal Surg. 7:1991;420-435
5. Gartry D.S., Kerr Muir M.G., Marshall J. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy; 18 month follow-up. Ophthalmology. 99:1992;1209-1219
6. Boxer Wachler B.S., Durrie D.S., Assil K.K., Krueger R.R. Role of clearance and treatment zones in contrast sensitivity. significance in refractive surgery J Cataract Refract Surg. 25:1999;16-23
7. Hersh P.S., Steinert R.F., Brint S.F. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis; comparison of optical side effects; Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 107:2000;925-933
8. Zürcher M., Schipper I., Schüpfer G., Senn P. Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Excimer Laser in Luzern. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 200:1992;338-342
9. Hersh P.S., Stulting R.D., Steinert R.F., et al. Results of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia; the Summit PRK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 104:1997;1535-1553
10. Bailey I.L., Bullimore M.A. A new test for the evaluation of disability glare. Optom Vis Sci. 68:1991;911-917
11. American Academy of Ophthalmology Contrast sensitivity and glare testing in the evaluation of anterior segment disease. Ophthalmic Procedures Assessment. Ophthalmology. 97:1990;1233-1237
12. Gartry D.S., Kerr Muir M.G., Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy with an argon fluoride excimer laser. a clinical study Refract Corneal Surg. 7:1991;420-435
13. Fantes F.E., Hanna K.D., Waring G.O. III, et al. Wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis (photorefractive keratectomy) in monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol. 108:1990;665-675
14. Pop M., Aras M. Photorefractive keratectomy retreatments for regression; one-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 103:1996;1979-1984
15. Holladay J.T., Dudeja D.R., Chang J. Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 25:1999;663-669
16. Wang Z., Chen J., Yeng B. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -1.25 to -6.00 diopters. J Refract Surg. 13:1997;528-534
17. Corbett M.C., Verma S., O'Brart D.P.S., et al. Effect of ablation profile on wound healing and visual performance 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 80:1996;224-234
18. Nakamura K., Bissen-Miyajima H., Toda I., et al. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis correction on contrast visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 27:2001;357-361
19. Verdon W., Bullimore M., Maloney R.K. Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy; a prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol. 114:1996;1465-1472
20. Pérez-Santonja J.J., Sakla H.F., Alió J.L. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 24:1998;183-189
21. Deitz M.R., Piebenga L.W., Matta C.S., et al. Ablation zone centration after photorefractive keratectomy and its effect on visual outcome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 22:1996;696-701
22. Seiler T., Kaemmerer M., Mierdel P., Krinke H.-E. Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Arch Ophthalmol. 118:2000;17-21
23. Mutyala S., McDonald M.B., Scheinblum K.A., et al. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 107:2000;1864-1867
24. Lipshitz I., Fisher L., Dotan G., et al. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy on one eye and laser in situ keratomileusis on the other eye of the same patient. J Refract Surg. 15:1999;S225-S226
25. Lee J.B., Kim J.S., Choe C.-M., et al. Comparison of two procedures. photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia Jpn J Ophthalmol. 45:2001;487-491
26. Van de Pol C., Soya K., Hwang D.G. Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 132:2001;204-210
27. El-Maghraby A., Salah T., Waring G.O. III, et al. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. Ophthalmology. 106:1999;447-457
28. Park C.K., Kim J.H. Comparison of wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in rabbits. J Cataract Refract Surg. 25:1999;842-850
29. Azar D.T., Pluznik D., Jain S., Khoury J.M. Gelatinase B and A expression after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 116:1998;1206-1208
30. Amm M., Wetzel W., Winter M., et al. Histopathological comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in rabbits. J Refract Surg. 12:1996;758-766
31. Lee J.B., Seong G.J., Lee J.H., et al. Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 27:2001;565-570
32. Azar D.T., Ang R.T., Lee J.-B., et al. Laser subepithelial keratomileusis. electron mycroscopy and visual outcomes of flap photorefractive keratectomy Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 12:2001;323-328
33. Tole D.M., McCarty D.J., Couper T., Taylor H.R. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia of -6.00 diopters or less; the Melbourne Excimer Laser Group. J Refract Surg. 17:2001;46-54
34. El Danasoury M.A., El Maghraby A., Klyce S.S., Mehrez K. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting low myopia (from -2.0 to -5.50 diopters). Ophthalmology. 106:1999;411-420. discussion by JH Talamo, 420-421
35. Pop M., Payette Y. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis; a control-matched study. Ophthalmology. 107:2000;251-257
36. Miller A.E., McCulley J.P., Bowman R.W., et al. Patient satisfaction after LASIK for myopia. CLAO J. 27:2001;84-88
37. McGhee C.N.J., Craig J.P., Sachdev N., et al. Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 26:2000;497-509
38. Panagopoulou S.I., Pallikaris I.G. Wavefront customized ablations with the WASCA Asclepion workstation. J Refract Surg. 17:2001;S608-S612
39. Mrochen M., Kaemmerer M., Seiler T. Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 27:2001;201-207
40. Marcos S., Barbero S., Llorente L., Merayo-Lloves J. Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 42:2001;3349-3356
41. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg. 17:2001;S596-S601
42. Endl M.J., Martinez C.E., Klyce S.D., et al. Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 119:2001;1159-1164
43. Moreno-Barriuso E., Lloves J.M., Marcos S., et al. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery. LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 42:2001;1396-1403
44. Oshika T., Klyce S.D., Applegate R.A., et al. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 127:1999;1-7
45. Luna J.D., Reviglio V.E., Juárez C.P. Bilateral macular hemorrhage after laser in situ keratomileusis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 237:1999;611-613
46. Mansour A.M., Ojeimi G.K. Premacular subhyaloid hemorrhage following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 16:2000;371-372
47. Lee A.G., Kohnen T., Ebner R., et al. Optic neuropathy associated with laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 26:2000;1581-1584
48. Farah M.E., Höfling-Lima A.L., Nascimento E. Early rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Refract Surg. 16:2000;739-743
49. Arevalo J.F., Ramirez E., Suarez E., et al. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in myopic eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis; frequency, characteristics, and mechanism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 27:2001;674-680
50. Melki S.A., Azar D.T. LASIK complications. etiology, management, and prevention Surv Ophthalmol. 46:2001;95-116
51. Ambrosio R. Jr., Wilson S.E. Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis. etiology, prevention, and treatment J Refract Surg. 17:2001;350-379
52. Davis E.A., Hardten D.R., Lindstrom R.L. LASIK complications. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 40(3):2000;67-75