Recent trends in drug-likeness prediction: A comprehensive review of in silico methods

Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 609-615

  Kadam, R ^a   Roy, N ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH NIPER   (India)

Author keywords

Available chemical databases (ACD) and modern drug data report (MDDR); Comprehensive medicinal chemistry (CMC); Drug like; Non drug likes

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER MODEL; DATA BASE; DRUG CLASSIFICATION; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG RESEARCH; MACHINE LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MOLECULE; REVIEW;

EID: 38349054482     PISSN: 0250474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0250-474x.38464     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Walters WP, Stahl MT, and Murcko MA. Virtual screening: An overview. Drug Discov Today 1998;3:160-78.
2. Walters WP, Murcko A, Murcko MA. Recognizing molecules with drug-like properties. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1999;3:384-7.
3. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1997;23:3-25.
4. Bemis GW, Murcko MA. The properties of known drugs, 1: Molecular frameworks. J Med Chem 1996;39:2887-93.
5. Bemis GW Murcko MA. Properties of known drugs, 2: Side chains. J Med Chem 1999;42:5095-9.
6. Lutz MW, Menius JA, Choi TD, Laskody RG, Domanico PL, Goetz AS, et al. Experimental design for high troughput screening. Drug Discov Today 1996;1:277-86.
7. Gallop MA, Barrett RW, Dower WJ, Foder SP, Gorden AM. Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery, 1: Background and peptide combinatorial libraries. J Med Chem 1994;37:1233-51.
8. Gorden EM, Barrett RW, Dower WJ, Foder SP, Gallop MA. Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery, 2: Combinatorial organic synthesis, library screening strategies and future directions. J Med Chem 1994;37:1385-401.
9. Martin EJ, Blaney JM, Siani MA, Splellmeyer DC, Wong AK, Moos WH. Measuring diversity: Experimental design of combinatorial libraries for drug discovery. J Med Chem 1995;38:1431-6.
10. Warr WA. Combinatorial chemistry and molecular diversity: An overview. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1997;37:134-40.
11. Brown RD, Martin YC. Designing combinatorial library mixtures using a genetic algorithm. J Med Chem 1997;40:2304-13.
12. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;46:3-26.
13. Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendolowski JJ. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) propertoies of small moleculesusing fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods. J Phys Chem 1998;102:3762-72.
14. Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendolowski JJ. A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery, 1: A qualitative characterization of known drug databases. J Comb Chem 1999;1:55-67.
15. Oprea TI. Property distribution of drug related chemical databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2000;14:251-64.
16. Andrews PR, Craik DJ, Martin JL. Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions. J Med Chem 1984;27:1648-57.
17. rd. Implementation of a system for reagent selection and library enumeration, profiling and design. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999;39:1161-72.
18. Muegge I, Heald SL, Brittelli D. Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter. J Med Chem 2001;44:1841-6.
19. James CA, Weininger D, Delany J. Daylight theory Manual, 4.71. Available from: http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.html.
20. Weininger D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system, 1: Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci.1988;28:31-6.
21. Wieninger D, Wieninger A, Wieninger JL. SMILES 2: Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1989;29:97-101.
22. Gillet VJ, Willett P, Bradshaw J, Green DV. Selecting combinatorial libraries to optimize diversity and physical properties. J Chem Inf Comp Sci 1999;39:169-77.
23. Zheng W, Hung ST, Saunders JT, Seibel GL. PICCOLO: A tool for combinatorial library design via multicriterion optimization. Pac Symp Biocomput 2000;5:585-96.
24. nd ed. Cambridge University Press: 1992. 444-51.
25. Agrafiotis DK, Myslik JC, Salemme FR. Advances in diversity profiling and combinatorial series design. Mol Divers 1998;4:1-22.