The effect of moisture of organic chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grain on the physical and mechanical properties

International Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 40-51

  Işik, Eşref ^a   Işik, Hülya ^b  

^a ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Mechanical properties; Moisture content; Organic chickpea grains; Physical properties

Indexed keywords

CICER ARIETINUM;

EID: 38349052332     PISSN: 18164897     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ijar.2008.40.51     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anonymous, 2006. TEMA (The Turkish foundation for combating soil erosion, for reforestation and the protection of natural habitats), Turkey.
2. Aviara, N.A., E. Mamman and B. Umar, 2005. Some physical properties of balanites aegyptiaca nuts. Biosyst. Eng., 92: 325-334.
3. Baryeh, E.A. and B.K. Mangope, 2002. Some physical properties of QP-38 variety pigeon pea. J. Food Eng., 56: 341-347.
4. Coskun, M.B., I. Yalçin and C. Özarslan, 2006. Physical properties of sweet corn seed (Zea mays saccharata Sturt). J. Food Eng., 74: 523-528.
5. Deshpande, S.D., S. Bal and T.P. Ojha, 1993. Physical properties of soybean. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 56: 89-98.
6. Dursun, E. and I. Dursun, 2005. Some physical properties of caper seed. Biosyst. Eng., 92: 237-245.
7. Gupta, R.K. and S.K. Das, 1997. Physical properties of sun?ower grains. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 66: 1-8.
8. Isik, E. and T. Güler, 2003. Determination of surface area for apples with image analysis technique. J. Uludag Univ. Agric., 17: 59-64.
9. Isik, E. and T. Güler, 2004. Determination of rupture stress of canitez chickpea under applied force with change in humidity. J. Uludag University Agric., 18: 25-31.
10. Isik, E., 2006. Moisture dependent physical and mechanical properties of green laird lentil (Lens culinaris) Grains. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 474-480.
11. Joshi, D.C., S.K. Das and R.K. Mukherjee, 1993. Physical properties of pumpkin grains. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 54: 219-229.
12. Konak, M., K. Carman and C. Aydin, 2002. Physical properties of chick pea grains. Biosyst. Eng., 82: 73-78.
13. Mohsenin, N.N., 1970. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. New York Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
14. Nimkar, P.M. and P.K. Chattopadhyay, 2001. Some physical properties of green gram. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 80: 183-189.
15. Nimkar, P.M., D.S. Mandwe and R.M. Dudhe, 2005. Physical properties of moth gram. Biosyst. Eng., 91: 183-189.
16. Öǧüt, H., 1998. Some physical properties of white lupin. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 69: 273-277.
17. Özarslan, C., 2002. Physical properties of cotton seed. Biosyst. Eng., 83: 169-174.
18. Özdemir, F. and I. Akinci, 2004. Physical and nutritional properties of four major commercial Turkish hazelnut varieties. J. Food Eng., 63: 341-347.
19. Saçilik, K., R. Özturk and R. Keskin, 2003. Some physical properties of hemp seed. Biosyst. Eng., 86: 191-198.
20. Sahoo, P.K. and A.P. Srivastava, 2002. Physical properties of okra seed. Biosyst. Eng., 83: 441-448.
21. Singh, K.K. and T.K. Goswami, 1996. Physical properties of cumin seed. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 64: 93-98.
22. SIS, 2006. Agricultural Statistic, Ankara, Turkey.
23. Suthar, S.H. and S.K. Das, 1996. Some physical properties of karingda [Citrullus lanatus (Thumb) mansf] grains. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 65: 15-22.
24. Tang, J. and S. Sokhansanj, 1993. Geometric changes in lentil grains caused by drying. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 56: 313-326.
25. Tekin, Y., E. Isik, H. Ünal and R. Okursoy, 2006. Physical and mechanical properties of Turkish göynük Bombay beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 2229-2235.
26. Tunde-Akintunde, T.Y. and B.O. Akintunde, 2004. Some physical properties of sesame seed. Biosyst. Eng., 88: 127-129.
27. Ünal, H., E. Isik and H.C. Alpsoy, 2006. Some physical and mechanical properties of black-eyed pea (Vigna unguiculata L.) grains. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 1799-1806.
28. Yalçin, I. and C. Özarslan, 2004. Physical properties of vetch seed. Biosyst. Eng., 88: 507-512.