Software process improvement in a small organization: Difficulties and suggestions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1487, Issue , 1998, Pages 1-12

  Demirors, Onur ^a   Demirors, Elif ^a  

^a DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ACTION PLAN; ISO 9001; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT MODELS; SMALL ORGANIZATIONS; SMALL SOFTWARE ORGANIZATIONS; SOFTWARE INDUSTRY; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 38349039486     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-64956-5_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Brooks, F. No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer, Vol. 20, No. 4 (1987) 10-9.
2. Demirors, O., Frailey, D. Why not Let Software Engineers to Define Their Own Processes. Software Process Improvement Forum.Vol.3, No.2 (1996) 12-15.
3. Fayad, M.E., Laitinen, M. Process Assessment Considered Wasteful. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 40 No. 11 (1997) 125-128.
4. Grunbacher P. A Software Assessment Process for Small Software Enterprises. In Proceedings of EUROMCRO 97, IEEE Computer Society Press, (1997).
5. TURSOFT. The Turkish Software Industry, (in Turkish) data is available from the authors (1996).