Process Assessment Considered Wasteful

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 125-128

  Fayad, Mohamed E ^b   Laitinen, Mauri ^a  

^a Laitinen Consulting   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT; PLANNING; STANDARDS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL; CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT; PROCESS ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0031276368     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/265684.265701     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bach, J. Enough about process: What we need are heroes. IEEE Softw. 12, 2 (Feb. 1995), 96-98.
2. El Emam, K. and Briand, L. Costs and benefits of software process improvement. In Better Software Practice for Business Benefit: Principles and Experience. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, 1997.
3. Bamberger J. Essense of the capability maturity model. IEEE Cnrnput. 30, 6 (Jun. 1997), 112-114.
4. Herbsleb, J., et al. Software quality and the-capability maturity model. Commun. ACM 40, 6, (Jun. 1997), 30-40.
5. Fayad, M.E. and Laitinen, M. Transition to Object-Oriented Software Development. Wiley, New York, to appear.