Golden-winged Warbler habitat use and abundance in northern Wisconsin

Wilson Journal of Ornithology

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 523-532

  Martin, Karl J ^a   Lutz, R Scott ^b   Worland, Mike ^a  

^a WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIOLOGICAL SURVEY; CONIFEROUS TREE; DECIDUOUS TREE; HABITAT USE; PASSERINE; POPULATION DECLINE; VEGETATION COVER;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

PINUS BANKSIANA; POPULUS; VERMIVORA CHRYSOPTERA;

EID: 38349035972     PISSN: 15594491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1676/06-103.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BAILEY, R. G. 1998. Ecoregions: the ecosystem geography of the oceans and continents. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
2. BURNHAM, K. P. AND D. R. ANDERSON. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference - a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
3. CLELAND, D. T., L. A. LEEFERS, AND D. DICKMANN. 2001. Ecology and management of aspen: a Lake States perspective. Pages 81-100 in Sustaining aspen in western landscapes: Symposium Proceedings (W. D. Shepperd, D. Binkley, D. L. Bartos, T. J. Stohlgren, and L. G. Eskew, Editors). General Technical Report RMRS-P-18. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
4. CONFER, J. L. 1992. Golden-winged Warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera). The birds of North America. Number 20.
5. CONFER, J. L. AND J. L. LARKIN. 1998. Behavioral interactions between Golden-winged and Blue-winged warblers. Auk 115:209-213.
6. CONFER, J. L. AND S. M. PASCOE. 2003. The avian community on utility rights-of-ways and other managed shrublands in northeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 85:193-206.
7. CONFER, J. L., P. E. ALLEN, AND J. L. LARKIN. 2003. Effects of vegetation, interspecific competition, and brood parasitism on Golden-winged Warbler nesting success. Auk 121:138-144.
8. HUFFMAN, R. D. 1997. Effects of residual overstory on bird use and aspen regeneration in aspen harvest sites in Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota. Thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
9. HUNTER, W. C., D. A. BUEHLER, R. A. CANTERBURY, J. L. CONFER, AND P. B. HAMEL. 2001. Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:440-455.
10. KLAUS, N. A. AND D. A. BUEHLER. 2001. Golden-winged Warbler breeding habitat characteristics and nest success in clearcuts in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Wilson Bulletin 113:297-301.
11. RICH, T. D., C. J. BEARDMORE, H. BERLANGA, P. J. BLANCHER, M. S. W. BRADSTREET, G. S. BUTCHER, D. W. DEMAREST, E. H. DUNN, W. C. HUNTER, E. E. IÑIGO-ELIAS, J. A. KENNEDY, A. M. MARTELL, A. O. PANJABI, D. N. PASHLEY, K. V. ROSENBERG, C. M. RUSTAY, J. S. WENDT, AND T. C. WILL. 2004. Partners in Flight North American Landbird Conservation Plan. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Ithaca, New York, USA. http://www. partnersinflight.org/cont_plan/ (VERSION: March 2005).
12. ROTH, A. M. 2001. Impact of forest succession on shrubland-dependent birds in aspen forests managed with traditional and alternative clearcutting systems in northern Wisconsin. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
13. ROTH, A. M. AND R. S. LUTZ. 2004. Relationships between territorial male Golden-winged Warblers in managed aspen stands in northern Wisconsin, USA. Forest Science 50:153-161.
14. RUTH, J. M. 2004. Partners in Flight - U.S. Website. USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA. www.partnersinflight. org.
15. SAMUEL, D. E. 1997. Effects of residual overstory on bird use and aspen regeneration in aspen harvest sites in Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota. Thesis. West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
16. SAS INSTITUTE. 2003. SAS/STAT statistical analysis software. Release 9.0. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
17. SAUER, J. R., J. E. HINES, AND J. FALLON. 2004. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966-2003. Version 2004.1. USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA. www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs. html.
18. SMITH, C. R., D. M. PENCE, AND R. J. O'CONNOR. 1993. Status of neotropical migratory birds in the north-east: a preliminary assessment. Pages 172-188 in Status and management of neotropical migratory birds (D. M. Finch and P. W. Stangel, Editors). General Technical Report RM-229. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
19. TOMS, J. D., F. K. A. SCHMIEGELOW, S. J. HANNON, AND M. A. VILLARD. 2006. Are point counts of boreal songbirds reliable proxies for more intensive abundance estimators? Auk 123:438-454.
20. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR. 2002. Fish and wildlife resource conservation priorities, Region 3. January 2002. Fort Snelling, Minnesota, USA.
21. VAN HORNE, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:893-901.
22. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 1998. WISCLAND land cover. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, USA.