Relationship between territorial male golden-winged warblers in managed aspen stands in northern Wisconsin, USA

Forest Science

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 153-161

  Roth, Amber M ^a,b   Lutz, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Clearcut; Forest succession; GWWA; Populus; Vermivora chrysoptera

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; CUTTING; SEED; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

GOLDEN-WINGED WARBLERS; HABITAT QUALITY;

FORESTRY;

ANIMALIA; POPULUS; VERMIVORA; VERMIVORA CHRYSOPTERA;

EID: 2642527980     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. BOELTER, J.M. 1988. Soil survey of Oneida County, Wisconsin. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 68 p.
2. COLLINS, S.L., F.C. JAMES, AND P.G. RISSER. 1982. Habitat relationships of wood warblers (Parulidae) in northern central Minnesota. Oikos 39:50-58.
3. CONFER, J. 1992. Golden-winged Warbler in The birds of North America, No. 20. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 16 p.
4. CONFER, J., AND K. KNAPP. 1981. Golden-winged warblers and blue-winged warblers: The relative success of a habitat specialist and a generalist. Auk 98:108-114.
5. CUMMING, E.E. 1998. Distribution and habitat associations of Golden-winged Warblers in Duck Mountain, Riding Mountain, and Porcupine Hills, Manitoba, 1998. Canadian Wildlife Service, Forest Bird Research Division. 49 p.
6. DESSECKER, D.R., AND D.G. MCAULEY. 2001. Importance of early successional habitat to ruffed grouse and American woodcock. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29:456-465.
7. DONOVAN, T.M., F.R. THOMPSON III, J. FAABORG, AND J.R. PROBST. 1995. Reproductive success of migratory birds in habitat sources and sinks. Cons. Biol. 9:1380-1395.
8. FICKEN, M.S., AND R.W. FICKEN. 1968a. Territorial relationships of blue-winged warblers, golden-winged warblers, and their hybrids. Wilson Bull. 80:442-451.
9. FICKEN, M.S., AND R.W. FICKEN. 1968b. Ecology of blue-winged warblers, golden-winged warblers, and some other Vermivora. Am. Midl. Nat. 79: 311-319.
10. FOUCHI, C.M., AND G.W. GULLION. 1984. Nongame bird response to aspen regeneration. P. 218-229 in Proceedings of the workshop on management of nongame species and ecological communities, McComb, W.C. (ed.). University of Kentucky, Lexington. 404 p.
11. FRECH, M.H., AND J.L. CONFER. 1987. The Golden-winged Warbler: competition with the blue-winged warbler and habitat selection in portions of southern, central, and northern New York. Kingbird. 17:65-71.
12. GIESE, R.L., J.W. BALSIGER, A.R. EK, AND D.T. LESTER. 1976. Clearcutting: One silvicultural system used in Wisconsin forestry. Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Staff Paper Series No. 5. 24 p.
13. HANSKI, I.K., T.J. FENSKE, AND G.J. NIEMI. 1996. Lack of edge effect in nesting success of breeding birds in managed forest landscapes. Auk 113:578-585.
14. HINTZE, J. 2003. Number Crunching Statistical Software 2000 and power analysis and sample size. Kaysville, Utah. 778 p.
15. HUFFMAN, R.D. 1997. Effects of residual overstory on bird use and aspen regeneration in aspen harvest sites in Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota. M.Sc. thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. 129 p.
16. HUNTER, W.C., D.A. BUEHLER, R.A. CANTERBURY, J.L. CONFER, AND P.B. HAMEL. 2001. Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in Eastern North America. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29:440-455.
17. INTERNATIONAL BIRD CENSUS COMMITTEE. 1970. An international standard for a mapping method in bird census work. Audubon Field Notes 24:722-726.
18. MITCHELL, M.J. 1993. Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Wisconsin. USDA Soil Conservation Service. 73 p.
19. MURRAY, B.G., AND F.B. GILL. 1976. Behavioral interactions of blue-winged and golden-winged warblers. Wilson Bull. 88:231-254.
20. NEWTON, I. 1998. Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 597 pp.
21. POWERS, R.F. 1989. Do timber management operations degrade long-term productivity? A research and national forest system cooperative study. P. 101-115 in Proceedings of the National Silviculture Workshop: Silviculture challenges and opportunities of the 1990s, Petersburg, Alaska. 216 p.
22. PROBST, J.R., D.S. RAKSTAD, AND D.J. RUGG. 1992. Breeding bird communities in regenerating and mature broadleaf forests in the USA Lake States. For. Ecol. Manage. 49:43-60.
23. PURCELL, K.L., AND J. VERNER. 1998. Density and reproductive success of California towhees. Cons. Biol. 12:442-450.
24. ROBEL, R.J., J.N. BRIGGS, A.D. DAYTON, AND L.C. HULBERT. 1970. Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. J. Range Manag. 23:295-297.
25. ROTH, A.M. 2001. Impact of forest succession on shrubland-dependent birds in aspen forests managed with traditional and alternative clearcutting systems in northern Wisconsin. M.Sc. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 118 p.
26. RUDNICKY, T.C., AND M.L. HUNTER, JR. 1993. Avian nest predation in clearcuts, forests, and edges in a forest-dominated landscape. J. Wildl. Manage. 57:358-364.
27. SAUER, J.R., J.E. HINES, AND J. FALLON. 2001. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2000. Version 2001.2, USGS Paruxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.
28. SCHMIDT, T.L. 1997. Wisconsin forest statistics, 1996. USDA Forest Service North Central Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. NC-183. 457 p.
29. SEITZ, L.C., AND D.A. ZEGERS. 1993. An experimental study of nest predation in adjacent deciduous, coniferous and successional habitats. Condor 95:297-304.
30. SMITH, T.M., AND H.H. SHUGART. 1987. Territory size variation in the ovenbird: the role of habitat structure. Ecology 68:695-704.
31. STEFFEN, J.F. 1985. Some effects of clearcutting on songbird populations in the northern hardwood forest. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 73:123-132.
32. STENGER, J. 1958. Food habits and available food of ovenbirds in relation to territory size. Auk 75:335-346.
33. THOMPSON, F.R., S.J. LEWIS, J. GREEN, AND D. EWERT. 2003. Status of neotropical migrant landbirds in the midwest: Identifying species of management concern. P. 145-158 in Status and management of neotropical migratory birds; 1992 Sept 21-25, Estes Park, CO., Finch, D.M. and P.W. Stangel (ed.). Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-229. USDA For. Serv. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Fort Collins, CO. 422 p.
34. TRIMBLE NAVIGATION. 1999. Pathfinder Office 2.51. Sunnyvale, CA. 75 p.
35. US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 2002. Fish and wildlife resource conservation priorities, Region 3. January 2002. 32 p.
36. VANDER HAEGEN, W.M., AND R.M. DEGRAAF. 1996. Predation rates on artificial nests in an industrial forest landscape. For. Ecol. Manage. 86:171-179.
37. VAN HORNE, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Manage. 47:893-901.
38. VICKERY, P.D., M.L. HUNTER, JR., AND J.V. WELLS. 1992. Is density an indicator of breeding success? Auk 109:706-710.
39. WEMMER, L.C. 1993. Avian diversity in managed aspen and northern hardwood forest in Minnesota. M.Sc. thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. 69 p.
40. WILL, T.C. 1986. The behavioral ecology of species replacement: Blue-winged and golden-winged warblers in Michigan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 126 p.
41. YAHNER, R.H. 1991. Avian nesting ecology in small even-aged aspen stands. J. Wildl. Manage. 55:155-159.
42. YAHNER, R.H., AND B.L. CYPHER. 1987. Effects of nest location on depredation of artificial arboreal nests. J. Wildl. Manage. 51:178-181.
43. YAHNER, R.H., AND A.L. WRIGHT. 1985. Depredation on artificial ground nests: Effects of edge and plot age. J. Wildl. Manage. 49:508-513.