Spatial frequency integration for binocular correspondence in macaque area V4

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 402-408

  Kumano, Hironori ^a   Tanabe, Seiji ^a   Fujita, Ichiro ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN NERVE CELL; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; EXTRASTRIATE CORTEX; GRATING; MACACA; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; MACACA; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 38349020224     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00096.2007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cogan AI, Lomakin AJ, Rossi AF. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay. Vision Res 33: 1959-1975, 1993.
2. Cumming BG, Parker AJ. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature 389: 280-283, 1997.
3. Cumming BG, Shapiro SE, Parker AJ. Disparity detection in anticorrelated stereograms. Perception 27: 1367-1377, 1998.
4. Dean AF. The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 44: 437-440, 1981.
5. Desimone R, Schein SJ. Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form. J Neurophysiol 57: 835-868, 1987.
6. Farell B, Li S, McKee SP. Coarse scales, fine scales, and their interactions in stereo vision. J Vis 4: 488-499, 2004.
7. Fleet DJ, Wagner H, Heeger DJ. Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Res 36: 1839-1857, 1996.
8. Foster KH, Gaska JP, Nagler M, Pollen DA. Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurones in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. J Physiol 365: 331-363, 1985.
9. Janssen P, Vogels R, Liu Y, Orban GA. At least at the level of inferior temporal cortex, the stereo correspondence problem is solved. Neuron 37: 693-701, 2003.
10. Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1971.
11. Kumano H, Tanabe S, Fujita I. Spatial frequency integration for stereo processing in macaque visual area V4 (abstract). J Vision 6: 895a, 2006.
12. Lippert J, Fleet DJ, Wagner H. Disparity tuning as simulated by a neural net. Biol Cybern 83: 61-72, 2000.
13. Lippert J, Wagner H. A threshold explains modulation of neural responses to opposite-contrast stereograms. Neuroreport 12: 3205-3208, 2001.
14. Marr D, Poggio T. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 204: 301-328, 1979.
15. Menz MD, Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth processing in the visual cortex: a coarse-to-fine mechanism. Nat Neurosci 6: 59-65, 2003.
16. Menz MD, Freeman RD. Functional connectivity of disparity-tuned neurons in the visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 91: 1794-1807, 2004a.
17. Menz MD, Freeman RD. Temporal dynamics of binocular disparity processing in the central visual pathway. J Neurophysiol 91: 1782-1793, 2004b.
18. Nieder A, Wagner H. Hierarchical processing of horizontal disparity information in the visual forebrain of behaving owls. J Neurosci 21: 4514-4522, 2001.
19. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 249: 1037-1041, 1990.
20. Prince SJD, Pointon AD, Cumming BG, Parker AJ. Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. J Neurophysiol 87: 191-208, 2002.
21. Read JCA. A Bayesian model of stereopsis depth and motion direction discrimination. Biol Cybern 86: 117-136, 2002.
22. Read JCA, Cumming BG. Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 90: 2795-2817, 2003.
23. Read JCA, Cumming BG. Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1. J Neurophysiol 91: 1271-1281, 2004.
24. Read JCA, Eagle RA. Reversed stereo depth and motion direction with anti-correlated stimuli. Vision Res 40: 3345-3358, 2000.
25. Read JCA, Parker AJ, Cumming BG. A simple model accounts for the response of disparity-tuned V1 neurons to anticorrelated images. Vis Neurosci 19: 735-753, 2002.
26. Rohaly AM, Wilson HR. Nature of coarse-to-fine constraints on binocular fusion. J Opt Soc Am A 10: 2433-2441, 1993.
27. Rohaly AM, Wilson HR. Disparity averaging across spatial scales. Vision Res 34: 1315-1325, 1994.
28. Smallman HS. Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis. Vision Res 35: 1047-1060, 1995.
29. Tanabe S, Doi T, Umeda K, Fujita I. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4. J Neurophysiol 94: 2683-2699, 2005.
30. Tanabe S, Umeda K, Fujita I. Rejection of false matches for binocular correspondence in macaque visual cortical area V4. J Neurosci 24: 8170-8180, 2004.
31. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Thompson ID. The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast. Exp Brain Res 41: 414-419, 1981.
32. Umeda K, Tanabe S, Fujita I. Representation of stereoscopic depth based on relative disparity in macaque area V4. J Neurophysiol 98: 241-252, 2007.
33. Watanabe M, Tanaka H, Uka T, Fujita I. Disparity-selective neurons in area V4 of macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol 87: 1960-1973, 2002.
34. Westheimer G, McKee SP. Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images. J Opt Soc Am 70: 772-778, 1980.
35. Wilson HR, Blake R, Halpern DL. Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. J Opt Soc Am A 8: 229-236, 1991.