Heat Maps. An Aid for Data Analysis and Understanding of ROC CAD Experiments

Academic Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 249-259

  Freedman, Matthew T ^a   Osicka, Teresa ^a,b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Catholic University of America   (United States)

Author keywords

chest radiographs; clustering; Computer aided detection; heat maps; observer variability

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HEAT MAP; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; COLOR; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HEAT; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUNG NEOPLASMS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; ROC CURVE;

EID: 38149137961     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Freedman M.T., and Osicka T. Reader variability: what we can we learn from computer-aided detection experiments. J Am Coll Radiol 3 (2006) 446-455
2. Freedman M.T., Osicka T., Zhu Y., et al. Heat maps as a data visualization and exploration method for multireader-multicase ROC computer-aided detection experiments. Int J CARS 1 (2006) 348-350
3. Jiang Y., Nishikawa R.M., Schmidt R.A., et al. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 220 (2001) 787-794
4. Yerushalmy J. The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows. Radiol Clin North Am 7 (1969) 381-392
5. Beam C.A., Conant E.F., and Sickles E.A. Association of volume and volume independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003) 282-290
6. Kobayashi T., Xu X.W., MacMahon H., et al. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology 99 (1996) 843-848
7. Awai K., Murao K., Ozawa A., et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on Radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 230 (2004) 347-352
8. Barlow W.E., Chi C., Carney P.A., et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 1840-1850
9. Deus Technologies L.L.C. RapidScreen RS-2000. US Food and Drug Administration premarket approval P000041. July 12, 2001. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mda/docs/P000041.html
10. Stitik F., and Tockman M. Radiographic screening in the early detection of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 16 (1978) 347-366
11. Stitik F., Tockman M., and Khouri N. Chest radiology. In: Miller A.B. (Ed). Screening for cancer (1985), Academic Press, New York 163-191
12. Austin J.H.M., Romney B.M., and Goldsmith L.S. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 182 (1992) 115-122
13. Quekel L.G., Kessels A.G., Goei R., and van Engelshoven J.M. Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. Chest 115 (1999) 720-724
14. Shah P.K., Austin J.H., White C.S., et al. Missed non-small cell lung cancer: Radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect. Radiology 226 (2003) 235-241
15. Bar-Joseph Z., Gifford D.K., and Jaakkola T.S. Fast optimal leaf ordering for hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) S22-S29
16. Eisen M.B., Spellman P.T., Brown P.O., and Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95 (1998) 14863-14868
17. Matlab tutorial v.2006b, 1984-2006 The MathWorks, Inc.
18. Elmore J.G., Miglioretti D.L., Reisch L.M., et al. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 94 (2002) 1373-1380
19. Beiden S.V., Wagner R.F., Nishikawa R.M., et al. Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities. Proc SPIE Med Imag 4686 (2002) 198-204
20. Beiden S.V., Wagner R.F., Doi K., et al. Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 1036-1043