Experiential hierarchies of streets

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 41-52

  Tomko, Martin ^a   Winter, Stephan ^a   Claramunt, Christophe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b Naval Academy Research Institute   (France)

Author keywords

Centrality; Experiential hierarchy; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

DATA DESCRIPTION; DATA STRUCTURES; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; TRACKING (POSITION);

CENTRALITY; EXPERIENTIAL HIERARCHY;

ROADS AND STREETS;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA;

EID: 38149131260     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alexander C. A city is not a tree. In: Thackara J. (Ed). Design after modernism: Beyond the object (1988), Thames and Hudson, London 67-84
2. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2006). Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis, v1.12. http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/.
3. Bera R., and Claramunt C. Topology-based proximities in spatial systems. Journal of Geographical Systems 5 4 (2003) 331-415
4. Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw v. 2.043. Graph Visualization Software.
5. Claramunt C., and Winter S. Structural salience of elements of the city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34 (2007)
6. Couclelis H., Golledge R.G., Gale N., and Tobler W. Exploring the anchorpoint hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology 7 (1987) 99-122
7. Dalton, N. S. C. (2006). Configuration and neighborhood: is place measurable? In space syntax and spatial cognition workshop of the spatial cognition '06 conference, Bremen, Germany.
8. Eppell, V., McClurg, B. A., & Bunker, J. M. (2001). A four level road hierarchy for network planning and management. In Jaeger, Vicki (Eds.), 20th ARRB conference, Melbourne, Australia.
9. Figueiredo, L. (2002). Mindwalk.
10. Figueiredo L., and Amorim L. Continuity lines in the axial system. The fifth space syntax international symposium (2005), Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
11. Freeman L.C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40 1 (1977) 35-41
12. Hanneman, R., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods.
13. Hillier B., and Hanson J. The social logic of space (1984), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
14. Hirtle S. Neighborhoods and landmarks. In: Duckham M., Goodchild M., and Worboys M. (Eds). Foundations of geographic information science (2003), Taylor & Francis, London and New York 191-203
15. Hirtle S., and Jonides J. Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition 13 (1985) 208-217
16. Jiang B., and Claramunt C. A structural approach to the model generalisation of an urban street network. Geoinformatica 8 2 (2003) 151-171
17. Jiang B., and Claramunt C. Topological analysis of urban street networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (2004) 151-162
18. Kuipers, B. (2001). The skeleton in the cognitive map. A computational hypothesis. In 3rd international space syntax symposium, Atlanta.
19. Lynch K. The image of the city (1960), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Marshall S. Streets and patterns (2004), Spon Press
21. Michon P.-E., and Denis M. When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions?. In: Montello D.R. (Ed). Spatial information theory. Foundations of geographic information science: international conference, COSIT 2001 Morro Bay, CA, USA, September 19-23, 2001. Proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2205 (2001), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 292-305
22. Newman, E. L., Caplan, J. B., Kirschen, M. P., Korolev, I. O., Sekuler, R., & Kahana, M. J. (in press). Learning your way around town: How virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information. Cognition.
23. Newman M.E.J. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics 46 5 (2005) 323-351
24. Newman M.E.J., and Girvan M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69 026113 (2004) 1-6
25. Plumert J.M., Carswell C., de Vet K., and Ihrig D. The content and organization of communication about object locations. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1995) 477-498
26. Plumert J.M., Spalding T.L., and Nichols-Whitehead P. Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication. Memory and Cognition 29 2 (2001) 274-284
27. Porta S., Crucitti P., and Latora V. The network analysis of urban streets: A dual approach. Physica A 369 2 (2006) 853-866
28. Raubal M., and Winter S. Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer M.J., and Mark D.M. (Eds). Geographic information science: Second international conference, GIScience 2002, Boulder, CO, USA, September 25-28, 2002. Proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2478 (2002), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 243-259
29. Richter, K.-F., Klippel, A., & Freksa, C. (2004). Shortest, fastest - but what's next? A different approach to route directions. In Muensteraner GI-Tage 2004. IfGIprints. Institut fuer Geoinformatik, Muenster, Germany.
30. Shanon B. Where questions. 17th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (1979), ACL, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
31. Siegel A.W., and White S.H. The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 10 (1975) 9-55
32. Sorrows M.E., and Hirtle S. The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: Freksa C., and Mark D. (Eds). Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science: international conference COSIT'99, Stade, Germany, August 1999. Proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 1661 (1999), Springer, Berlin, Hei delberg 37-50
33. Sperber D., and Wilson D. Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension. In: Smith N.V. (Ed). Mutual knowledge (1982), Academic Press, London 61-85
34. Sperber D., and Wilson D. Relevance (1986), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK
35. Stevens A., and Coupe P. Distortions in dudged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology 10 (1978) 422-437
36. Thomson, R. C., & Richardson, D. E. (1999). The Good continuation principle of perceptual organization applied to the generalization of road networks. In ICA 19th international cartographic conference, Ottawa, Canada.
37. Timpf S., and Kuhn W. Granularity transformations in wayfinding. In: Freksa C., Habel C., Brauer W., and Wender K. (Eds). Spatial cognition III - Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2685 (2003), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 77-88
38. Timpf S., Volta G., Pollock D., and Egenhofer M.J. A conceptual model of wayfinding using multiple levels of abstraction. In: Frank A., Campari I., and Formentini U. (Eds). Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. International conference GIS from space to territory: Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning, Pisa, Italy, September 2123, 1992 Proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 639 (1992), Springer, Berlin, Heidleberg 348-367
39. Tomko M., and Winter S. Initial entity identification for granular route directions. In: Kainz W., Riedl A., and Elmes G. (Eds). Progress in spatial data handling. 12th international symposium on spatial data handling (2006), Springer, Vienna, Austria 43-60
40. Tomko M., and Winter S. Recursive construction of granular route directions. Journal of Spatial Science 51 1 (2006) 101-115
41. Tversky B. Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: Frank A., and Campari I. (Eds). Spatial information theory a theoretical basis for GIS. European conference, COSIT'93 Marciana Marina, Elba Island, Italy September 1922, 1993 Proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 716 (1993), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 14-24
42. Wiener J.M., and Mallot H.A. 'Fine-to-coarse' route planning and navigation in regionalized environments. Spatial Cognition and Computation 3 4 (2003) 331-358