Body CT and oncologic imaging

Radiology

Volumn 215, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 27-40

  Hopper, Kenneth D ^a   Singapuri, Kishor ^a   Finkel, Arkady ^a  

^a PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsies; Computed tomography (CT); Computed tomography (CT), helical; Neoplasms; Neoplasms, CT; Neoplasms, staging; Neoplasms, therapeutic radiology; Radiology and radiologies, How i do it; Technology

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MEASUREMENT; METASTASIS; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR; TUMOR VOLUME; WHOLE BODY TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0034069212     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap1727     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Dorfman DD, Barloon TJ. Influence of clinical history upon detection of nodules and other lesions. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:48-55.
2. McNeil BJ, Hanley JA, Funkenstein HH, Wallman J. Paired receiver operating characteristic curves and the effect of history on radiographic interpretation. Radiology 1983; 149: 75-77.
3. Disler DG, Marr DS, Rosenthal DI. Accuracy of volume measurements of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging phantoms by three-dimensional reconstruction and preliminary clinical application. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:739-745.
4. Foley WD, Berland LL, Lawson TL, Smith DF, Thorsen MK. Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomographic scanning. Radiology 1983; 147:797-803.
5. Bressler EL, Alpern MB, Glazer GM, Francis IR, Ensminger WD. Hypervascular hepatic metastases: CT evaluation. Radiology 1987; 162:49-51.
6. DuBrow RA, David CL, Libshitz HI, Lorigan JG. Detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer: the role of nonenhanced and enhanced CT scanning. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14:366-369.
7. Magnusson A. Object size determination at computed tomography. Upsala J Med Sci 1987; 92:277-286.
8. Oliver JH, Baron RL, Federle MP, Jones BC, Sheng R. Hypervascular liver metastases: do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection? Radiology 1997; 205:709-715.
9. Gaa J, Saini S. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: diagnosis by means of rapid dynamic nonincremental CT. In: Ferrucci JT, Stark DD, eds. Liver imaging: current trends and new techniques. Boston, Mass: Andover Medical Publishers, 1990; 212-216.
10. Zeman RK, Baron RL, Jeffrey RB, Klein J, Siegel MJ, Silverman PM. Helical body CT: evolution of scanning protocols. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1427-1438.
11. Oliver JH, Baron RL. Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiology 1996; 201:1-14.
12. Baron RL, Oliver JH, Dodd GD, Nalesnik M, Holbert BL, Carr B. Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT. Radiology 1996, 199:505-511.
13. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, et al. Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (<3 cm) renal masses. Radiology 1997; 202:211-217.
14. Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Ramchandani P. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology 1996; 200:753-758.
15. Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobkin M, Bass JC, Francis IR. Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographic-phase CT scans. Radiology 1995; 196:445-451.
16. Keogan MT, McDermott VG, Paulson EK, et al. Pancreatic malignancy: effect of dual-phase helical CT in tumor detection and vascular opacification. Radiology 1997; 205: 513-518.
17. Hollett MD, Jorgensen MJ, Jeffrey RB Jr. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT. Radiology 1995; 195:359-361.
18. Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 1996; 199:697-701.
19. Silverman PM, Brown B, Wray H, et al. Optimal contrast enhancement of the liver using helical (spiral) CT: value of SmartPrep. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:1169-1171.
20. Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Tefft MC, et al. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, Smart-Prep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:73-78.
21. Kopka L, Funke M, Fisher U, Vosshenrich R, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E. Parenchymal liver enhancement with bolus-triggered helical CT: preliminary clinical results. Radiology 1995; 195:282-284.
22. Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Ducic I, et al. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:79-84.
23. Hopper KD, Mosher TJ, Kasales CJ, TenHave TR, Tully DA, Weaver JS. Thoracic spiral CT: delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution in a power injector. Radiology 1997; 205:269-271.
24. Mahaley MS, Gillespie GY, Hammett R. Computerized tomography brain scan tumor volume determinations. J Neurosurg 1990; 72:872-878.
25. Kalender WA, Polacin A, Süss C. A comparison of conventional and spiral CT: an experimental study on the detection of spherical lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18: 167-176.
26. Davros WJ, Herts BR, Walmsley JJ, Obuchowski NA. Determination of spiral CT slice sensitivity profiles using a point response phantom. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19:838-843.
27. Hopper KD, Kasales, CJ, Mahraj R, et al. The routine use of a higher order interpolator and bone algorithm in thoracic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:947-949.
28. Bach AM, Panicek DM, Schwartz LH, Herman SK, Ho MN, Castellino RA. CT bone window photography in patients with cancer. Radiology 1995; 197:849-852.
29. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staguet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981; 47:207-214.
30. Pochaczevasky R. The "self-reporting radiograph": a new pictorial dimension to the radiologist's report (letter). Br J Radiol 1975; 48:65.
31. Gelfand DW, Schwarz DL, Ott DJ. The illustrated report. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 167:1099-1100.
32. Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei E, et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis 1960; 11:7-33.
33. World Health Organization: WHO Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO offset publication no. 48. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1979.
34. Fornage BD. Measuring masses on cross-sectional images (letter). Radiology 1993; 187:289.
35. Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuston JC, et al. Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 1977; 39:1289-1294.
36. Lavin PT, Flowerdew G. Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumors. Cancer 1980; 46:1286-1290.
37. Moertel CG, Hanley JA. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer. Cancer 1976; 38:388-394.
38. Gurland J, Johnson RO. How reliable are tumor measurements? JAMA 1965; 194:125-130.
39. Gurland J, Johnson RO. Case for using only maximum diameter in measuring tumors. Cancer Chemother Rep 1996; 50:119-124.
40. Buell PE. The importance of tumor size in prognosis for resected bronchogenic carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1971; 3:539-551.
41. Furukawa H, Takayasu K, Mukai K, Inoue K, Kosuge T, Ushio K. Computed tomography of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: comparison of tumor size measured by dynamic computed tomography and histopathologic examination. Pancreas 1996; 13:231-235.
42. Quiox E, Wolkove N, Hanley J, Kreisman H. Problems in radiographic estimation of response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer. Cancer 1988; 62:489-493.
43. Grossman SA, Burch PA. Quantitation of tumor response to anti-neoplastic therapy. Semin Oncol 1988; 15:441-454.
44. Quivey JM, Castro JR, Chen GT, Moss A, Marks WM. Computerized tomography in the quantitative assessment of tumour response. Br J Cancer 1980; 41:30-34.
45. Oppenheimer DA, Young SW, Marmor JB. Work in progress: serial evaluation of tumor volume using computed tomography and contrast kinetics. Radiology 1983; 147:495-497.
46. Valicenti RK, Wasserman TH, Kucik NA. Analysis of prognostic factors in localized gastric lymphoma: the importance of bulk of disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 27:591-598.
47. Hopper KD, Diehl LF, Lynch JC, McCauslin MA. Mediastinal bulk in Hodgkin disease: method of measurement versus prognosis. Invest Radiol 1991; 26:1101-1110.
48. Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Van Slyke MA, Schwartz TA, TenHave TR, Jozefiak JA. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:851-854.
49. Tomayko MM, Reynolds CP. Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989; 24:148-154.
50. Fiirgaard B, Pedersen CB, Lundorf E. The size of acoustic neuromas: CT and MRI. Neuroradiology 1997; 39:599-601.
51. Wiener JJ, Newcombe RG. Measurements of uterine volume: a comparison between measurements by ultrasonography and by water displacement. J Clin Ultrasound 1992; 20: 457-460.
52. Collins GN, Raab GM, Hehir M, King B, Garraway WM. Reproducibility and observer variability of transrectal ultrasound measurements of prostatic volume. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21:1101-1105.
53. Sargent MA, Gupta SC. Sonographic measurement of relative renal volume in children: comparison with scintigraphic determination of relative renal function. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:157-160.
54. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al. Volume determinations using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 138: 329-333.
55. Friedman MA, Resser KJ, Moncus FS, Moss AA, Cann CE. How accurate are computed tomographic scans in assessment of changes in tumor size: Am J Med 1983; 75:193-198.
56. Oppenheimer DA, Young SW, Marmor JB. Serial evaluation of tumor volume using computed tomography and contrast kinetics. Radiology 1983; 147:495-497.
57. Reid MH. Organ and lesion volume measurements with computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983; 7:268-273.
58. Rubin RT, Phillips JJ. Adrenal gland volume determination by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects. Invest Radiol 1991; 26:465-469.
59. Yang NC, Leichner PK, Fishman EK, et al. CT volumetrics of primary liver cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10:621-628.
60. Cohen MD, Weber T, Grosfeld J. Preoperative evaluation of pediatric abdominal tumor volumes by computerized tomography. J Pediatr Surg 1984; 19:273.
61. Liang EY, Chan A, Chung SC, Metreweli C. Short communication: oesophageal tumour volume measurement using spiral CT. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:344-347.
62. Staron RB, Ford E. Computed tomographic volumetric calculation reproducibility. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:272-274.
63. Chou CY, Hsu KF, Wang ST, Huang SC, Tzeng CC, Huang KE. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in volume estimation of cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 66:89-93.
64. Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Zheng J, et al. Tumor size evaluated by pelvic examination compared with 3-D MR quantitative analysis in the prediction of outcome for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39:395-404.
65. Albright RE, Fram EK. Microcomputer-based technique for 3-D reconstruction and volume measurement of computed tomographic images: part 1 - phantom studies. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:881-885.
66. Johnson CR, Khandelwal SR, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Ravalese J, Wazer DE. The influence of quantitative tumor volume measurements on local control in advanced head and neck cancer using concomitant boost accelerated superfractionated irradiation. Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 32:635-641.
67. Wheatley JM, Rosenfield NS, Heller G, Feldstein D, LaQuaglia MP. Validation of a technique of computer-aided tumor volume determination. J Surg Res 1995; 59:621-626.
68. Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Eggli KD, et al. The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:930-937.
69. Velthuizen RP, Clarke LP, Phuphanich S, et al. Unsupervised measurement of brain tumor volume on MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5:594-605.
70. Ashtari M, Zito JL, Gold BI, Lieberman JA, Borenstein MT, Herman PG. Computerized volume measurement of brain structure. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:798-805.
71. Clatterbuck RE, Sipos EP. The efficient calculation of neurosurgically relevant volumes from computed tomographic scans using Cavalieri's direct estimator. Neurosurgery 1997; 40:339-343.
72. Eggli KD, Close P, Dillon PW, Umlauf M, Hopper KD. Three-dimensional quantitation of pediatric tumor bulk. Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25:1-6.
73. Van Hoe L, Haven F, Bellon E, et al. Factors influencing the accuracy of volume measurements in spiral CT: a phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:332-338.
74. Perez CA, Brady LW. Principles and practice of radiation oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1998.
75. Tannock I, Hill RP. The basic science of oncology. New York, NY: Pergamon, 1987.
76. Mohan R, Barest G, Brester LJ, et al. A comprehensive three-dimensional radiation treatment planning system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15:481-495.
77. Bleehan NA, Glatstein E, Haybittle JL. Radiation therapy planning. New York, NY: Dekker, 1983.
78. Frass BA. Computer-controlled radiation therapy and 3-D treatment planning. Presented at the 34th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, San Diego, November 9, 1992.
79. Stephenson JA, Wiley AL JR. Current techniques in three-dimensional CT simulation and radiation treatment planning. Oncology 1995; 9:1225-1232.
80. Boyer AL. Present and future developments in radiotherapy treatment units. Semin Radiat Oncol 1995; 5:146-155.
81. Kutcher GJ, Mageras GS, Leibel SA. Control, correction, and modeling of setup errors and organ motion. Semin Radiat Oncol 1995; 5:134-145.
82. Lindgren PG. Percutaneous needle biopsy. Acta Radiol Diagn 1982; 23:653-656.
83. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Stevens LA, Shirk SJ. Automated biopsy devices: a blinded evaluation. Radiology 1993; 187:653-660.
84. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Shirk SJ, Stevens LA. Blinded comparison of biopsy needles and automated devices in vitro. I. Biopsy of diffuse hepatic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:1293-1297.
85. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Shirk SJ, Stevens LA. Blinded comparison of biopsy needles and automated devices in vitro. II. Biopsy of medical renal disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:1299-1301.
86. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Hartzel JS, Potok PS. CT percutaneous biopsy guns: comparison of end-cut and side-notch devices in cadaveric specimens. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:195-199.
87. Hayashi N, Sakai T, Kitagawa M, et al. CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm: usefulness of spring-operated core biopsy needle and frozen-section pathologic diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 329-331.
88. Burbank F, Kaye K, Belville J, Ekuan J, Blumenfeld M. Image-guided automated core biopsies of the breast, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Radiology 1994; 191:165-171.
89. Arakawa H, Nakajima Y, Kurihara Y, Nimi H, Ishikawa T. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: a comparison between automated biopsy gun and fine needle aspiration. Clin Radiol 1996; 51:503-506.
90. Kardache M, Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Cochand-Priollet B, Pelage JP, Rymer R. Transjugular liver biopsy with an automated device. Radiology 1997; 204:369-372.
91. Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology 1996; 198:715-720.
92. Lucidarme O, Howarth N, Finet JF, Grenier PA. Intrapulmonary lesions: percutaneous automated biopsy with a detachable, 18-gauge, coaxial cutting needle. Radiology 1998; 207: 759-765.
93. Hopper KD, Grenko RT, TenHave TR, Hartzel J, Sturtz KW, Savage CA. Percutaneous biopsy of the liver and kidney by using coaxial technique: adequacy of the specimen obtained with three different needles in vitro. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:221-224.
94. Katada K, Kato R, Anno H, et al. Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology 1996; 200:851-856.
95. Langen HJ, Klose KC, Keulers P, Adam G, Jochims M, Günther RW. Artificial widening of the mediastinum to gain access for extra-pleural biopsy: clinical results. Radiology 1995; 196:703-706.
96. Bressler EL, Kirkham JA. Mediastinal masses: alternative approaches to CT-guided needle biopsy. Radiology 1994; 191:391-396.