The Effects of Group Support System Technology on Audit Group Decision Making

Auditing

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1996, Pages

  Bamber, E Michael ^a   Watson, Richard T ^a   Hill, Mary Callahan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Consensus; Disclosure decision; Group Support System; Multi auditor decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542468067     PISSN: 02780380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amer, T., K. Hackenbrack, and M. Nelson. 1994. Between-auditor differences in the interpretation of probability phrases. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Spring): 126-136.
2. Ashton, A. 1985. Does consensus imply accuracy in accounting studies of decision making? The Accounting Review (April): 173-185.
3. Bamber, E., P. Gillett, T. Mock, and K. Trotman. 1995. Audit judgment. In Auditing Practice, Research, and Education: A Productive Collaboration, edited by T. Bell and A. Wright, 55-85. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. Bostrom, R., R. Watson, and S. Kinney, eds. 1992. Computer Augmented Teamwork: A Guided Tour. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
5. Butler, J., and M. Crino. 1992. Effects of initial tendency and real risk on choice shift. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (October): 14-34.
6. Clapper, D., E. McLean, and R. Watson. 1991. An experimental investigation of the effect of a group decision support system on normative influence in small groups. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference in Information Systems. New York, NY: 273-282.
7. Davis, J. 1992. Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 1950-1990. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (June): 3-38.
8. Dennis, A., and R. Gallupe. 1993. A history of group support systems empirical research: Lessons learned and future directions. In Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, edited by L. Jessup and J. Valacich, 59-77. New York, NY: Macmillan.
9. DeSanctis, G., and R. Gallupe. 1987. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science (May): 589-609.
10. Gallupe, R., and W. Cooper. 1993. Brainstorming electronically. Sloan Management Review (Fall): 27-36.
11. Huber, G. 1984. Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Quarterly (September): 195-204.
12. Isenberg, D. 1986. Group polarization: A critical review and meta analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (May): 1141-1151.
13. Janis, I. 1972. Victims of Group Think: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
14. Jessup L., and J. Valacich, eds. 1993. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.
15. Jiambalvo, J., and N. Wilner. 1985. Auditor evaluation of contingent claims. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 1-11.
16. Kleindorfer, H., H. Kunreuther, and P. Schoemaker. 1993. Decision Sciences: An Integrative Perspective. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
17. Koonce, L. 1993. A cognitive characterization of audit analytical review. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Supplement): 57-76.
18. Lamm, H., and D. Myers. 1978. Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 11, edited by L. Berkowitz, 145-195. New York, NY: Academic Press.
19. Levine, J., and R. Moreland. 1990. Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology 41: 585-634.
20. Libby, R. 1985. Availability and the generation of hypotheses in analytical review. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 648-667.
21. Mock, T., and J. Turner. 1981. Internal Control Evaluation and Auditor Judgment. Auditing Research Monograph No. 3. New York, NY: AICPA.
22. Nunamaker, J. Jr., A. Dennis, J. Valacich, D. Vogel, and J. George. 1991. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM. 34(7): 40-61.
23. _, _, _, _, and _. 1993. Group support system research: Experience from the lab and field. In Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. edited by L. Jessup and J. Valacich, 125-145. New York, NY: Macmillan.
24. Park, W. 1990. A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3: 229-245.
25. Raghunandan, K., R. Grimlund, and A. Schepanski. 1991. Auditor evaluation of loss contingencies. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 549-569.
26. Reckers, P., and J. Schultz. 1993. The effect of fraud signals, evidence order, and group-assisted counsel. Behavioral Research in Accounting: 124-144.
27. Rich, T., I. Solomon, and K. Trotman. 1994. The audit review process: A cognitive characterization from the persuasion perspective. Working paper, University of Illinois.
28. Schultz, J., and P. Reckers. 1981. The impact of group processing on selected audit disclosure decisions. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 482-501.
29. Sniezek, J. 1992. Groups under uncertainty: An example of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52: 124-155.
30. Solomon, I. 1987. Multi-auditor judgment/decision making research. Journal of Accounting Literature: 1-25.
31. _, 1982. Probability assessment by individual auditors and audit teams: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 689-710.
32. Trotman, K., and P. Yetton. 1985. The effect of the review process on auditor judgments. Journal of Auditing Research (Spring): 256-267.
33. Turner, J., M. Wetherell, and M. Hogg. 1989. Referent informational influence and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology (June): 135-147.
34. Watson, R., G. DeSanctis, and M. Poole. 1988. Using a GSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly (September): 463-478.
35. Weick, K., and D. Meader. 1993. Sensemaking and group support systems. In Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, edited by L. Jessup and J. Valacich, 230-252. New York, NY: Macmillan.