A uniform conceptual model for knowledge management of international copyright law

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-109

  Lu, Wenhuan ^a,b   Ikeda, Mitsuru ^a  

^a JAPAN ADVANCED INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Information sharing; Intelligent supporting system; International copyright law; Legal knowledge representation; Ontology; Uniform conceptual model

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; INTERNATIONAL LAW; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONTOLOGY;

INFORMATION SHARING; INTELLIGENT SUPPORTING SYSTEM; INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAW; LEGAL KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; UNIFORM CONCEPTUAL MODELS;

COPYRIGHTS;

EID: 38149101629     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551507079418     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. B. Chandrasekaran, J.R. Josephson and V.R. Benjamins, What are ontologies, and why do we need them? Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE 14 (1) (1999) 20 - 26. [See also IEEE Intelligent Systems.]
2. J.F., Sowa Knowledge Representation: Logical Philosophical, and Computational Foundations ( Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2000 ).
3. T.J.M. Bench-Capon and P.R.S. Visser, Ontologies in legal information systems: the need for explicit specifications of domain conceptualizations. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL'97, 30 June to 3 July, Melbourne, Australia, 1997 (ACM, New York, 1997) 132-41.
4. R. Mizoguchi and M. Ikeda, Towards ontology engineering. In: D. Patterson et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Joint Pacific Asian Conference on Expert Systems/Singapore International Conference on Intelligent Systems (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 1997) 259-66.
5. R. Mizoguchi and J. Bourdeau, Using ontological engineering to overcome AI-ED problems, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11 (2) (2000) 107 - 21.
6. W. Lu and M. Ikeda, An intention-oriented model of copyright law for e-learning: international semantic mapping of copyright laws based on a copyright ontology. In Mitsum Ikeda, Chee-kit Looi, and David Jonassen (eds): Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 2005 (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2005) 757-60.
7. W. Lu and M. Ikeda, International semantic mapping of copyright law: a conceptualization supporting system with capability of "intention" and ontology. In: J. Gu and G. Chroust (eds), Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of the International Federation for Systems Research, IFSR2005 (JAIST, Tatsunokuchi, Ishikawa, 2005) 205-12.
8. W3C, Web Ontology Language (OWL) W3C recommendation (2004). Available at: www.w3.org/2004/OWL/ (accessed 10 May 2006 ).
9. N. Guarino, Formal ontology in information systems. In: N. Guarino (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, FOIS'98, Ogunquit, USA (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998) 105-16.
10. T.R. Gruber, Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43 (5 / 6) (1995). 907 - 28.
11. D.B. Lenat, CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure, Communications of the ACM 38 (11) (1995). 33 - 38.
12. A.T. Schreiber, B.J. Wielinga and W.H.J. Jansweijer, The KACTUS view on the "O" word. In: D. Skuce et al. (eds), International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing ( AAAI Press, Montreal, 1995 ).
13. M. Uschold and M. Grninger, Ontologies: principles, methods, and applications, Knowledge Engineering Review 11 (2) (1996) 93 - 155.
14. W. Swartout, R. Patil, K. Knight and T. Russ, Towards distributed use of large-scale ontologies. In: B. Gaines and M. Musen (eds), The 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW'96), Banff, Canada, 1996. Available at: http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW96/KAW96Proc.html (accessed 11 April 2007 ).
15. G. Van Heijst, A. Schreiber and B.J. Wielinga, Using explicit ontologies in KBS development, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46 (2 / 3) (1997) 183 - 292.
16. HOZO, Ontology Editor (1996). Available at: www.hozo.jp/ (accessed 8 May 2006 ).
17. Wipo (2006). Available at: www.wipo.int/copyright/en/ (accessed 8 May 2006 ).
18. R. Mizoguchi, Ontology engineering environments. In: S. Staab and R. Studer, (eds) 2003 Handbook on Ontologies ( Springer, Berlin, 2003 ).
19. H. Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law (2 nd edition) ( University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967 ).
20. H. Kelsen, General Theory of Norms ( Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991 ).
21. T. McCarty, A language for legal discourse, I: basic structures. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI and Law ( ACM, 1989 ).
22. A. Hamfelt and J. Barklund, Metaprogramming for representation of legal principles. In: M. Bruynooghe (ed.), Proceedings of Meta'90, the Second Workshop on Meta-Programming in Logic, Leuven, Belgium, April 1990 ( DTAI, Leuven, 1990 ).
23. L. Allen and C. Saxon, more ia needed in ai: interpretation assistance for coping with the problem of multiple structural interpretations. In: R. Susskind (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on AI and Law ( ACM, Oxford, 1991 ).
24. L. Allen, The language of legal relations, RLL: useful in a legal ontology toolkit? In: P.R.S. Visser and R. Winkels (eds), Legal Ontologies: Proceedings of the ICAIL-97 Workshop ( ACM, New York, 1997 ).
25. A. Valente, Legal Knowledge Engineering: a Modelling Approach ( IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1995 ).
26. A. Valente, J. Breuker and P. Brouwer, Legal modelling and automated reasoning with ON-LINE, International Journal of Human Computer Studies 51 (6) (1999) 1079 - 1126.
27. J. Breuker, Constructing a legal core ontology: LRI-Core. In: H.S.F. Freitas and R. Volz (eds), Proceedings of WONTO-2004, Workshop on Ontologies and their Applications ( LivroRapido, Sao Luis, Maranhao, 2004 ).
28. J. Breuker and R. Hoekstra, Epistemology and ontology in core ontologies: FOLaw and LRI-Core, two core ontologies for law. In: A. Gangemi and S. Borgo (eds), Proceedings of the EKAW Workshop on Core Ontologies, 2004. Available at http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-118/ (accessed 11 April 2007 ).
29. Odrl (2000). Available at: http://odrl.net (accessed 26 July 2006 ).
30. IPROnto (2003). Available at: http://dmag.upf.es/ontologies/ipronto/ index.html (accessed 26 July 2006 ).