Reuse, repurposing and learning design - Lessons from the DART project

Computers and Education

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 601-612

  Bond, Stephen T ^a   Ingram, Caroline ^a   Ryan, Steve ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Authoring tools and methods; Media in education; Post secondary education; Simulations; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; E-LEARNING; TEACHING;

AUTHORING TOOLS; LEARNING STRATEGIES; MEDIA IN EDUCATION; POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 38149088255     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brew, A. (2002). Enhancing the quality of learning and research-led teaching. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual international conference of the higher education research and development society of Australasia (HERDSA). Accessed 23.04.07.
2. CSU. (2006). Measures of success VIII. Report to the California Legislature. Accessed 15.03.07.
3. Dahlquist, G., Hoffman, B., & Millman, D. (2005). Integrating digital libraries and electronic publishing in the DART project. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, Denver, CO, US (pp. 114-120). Accessed 25.04.07.
4. DART (i). Project website at LSE. Accessed 25.04.07.
5. DART (ii). Presentations and publicity. Accessed 25.04.07.
6. Feldstein, M. (2006). There's no such thing as a learning object. E-Learn Magazine. Accessed 23.04.07.
7. Gunn C., Woodgate S., and O'Grady W. Repurposing learning objects: a sustainable alternative?. ALT-J 13 3 (2005) 189-200
8. Jorum. (2004). Jorum Scoping and Technical Appraisal Study (Vol. I) 2. Accessed 31.01.07.
9. Koppi T., Bogle L., and Lavitt N. Institutional use of learning objects: Lessons learned and future directions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13 4 (2004) 449-463
10. Laurillard D., and McAndrew P. Reusable educational software: A basis for generic learning activities. In: Littlejohn A. (Ed). Reusing online resources (2003), Kogan Page, London 81-93
11. MERLOT website. (2007). Accessed 21.03.07.
12. Shea, P., McCall, S., & Ozdogru, A. (2006). Adoption of the multimedia educational resource for learning and online teaching (MERLOT) among higher education faculty: Evidence from the State University of New York Learning Network. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2 (3). Accessed 15.03.07.
13. SoURCE (i). Project website. Accessed 20.04.2007.
14. SoURCE (ii). The elicitation engine. Various documents. Accessed 17.04.2007.
15. Tompsett C. Reconfigurability: Creating new courses from existing learning objects will always be difficult!. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 6 (2005) 440-448
16. Twigg, C. (2003). Build it, but will they come? The Learning MarketSpace, July 2003. Accessed 15.03.07.
17. Zemsky, R., & Massy, W.F. (2004). Thwarted innovation: What happended to e-learning and why. The Learning Alliance: University of Pennsylvania. Accessed 25.04.07.