Receiver operating characteristic surfaces in the presence of verification bias

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-23

  Chi, Yueh Yun ^a   Zhou, Xiao Hua ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Jackknife; Maximum likelihood estimate; Ordinal tests

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149069486     PISSN: 00359254     EISSN: 14679876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2007.00597.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Agresti, A. (1990) Categorical Data Analysis. New York : Wiley.
2. Alonzo, T. A. Pepe, M. S. (2005) Assessing accuracy of a continuous screening test in the presence of verification bias. Appl. Statist., 54, 173 190.
3. Begg, C. B. Greenes, R. A. (1983) Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. Biometrics, 39, 207 216.
4. Dreiseitl, S., Ohno-Machado, L. Binder, M. (2000) Comparing three-class diagnostic tests by three-way ROC analysis. Med. Decsn Makng, 20, 323 331.
5. Efron, B. Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York : Chapman and Hall.
6. Folstein, M., Folstein, S. McHugh, S. (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res., 12, 189 198.
7. Gray, R., Begg, C. B. Greenes, R. A. (1984) Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias. Med. Decsn Makng, 4, 151 164.
8. Harel, O Zhou, X. H 2006) Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias. Statist. Med., 25, 3769 3786.
9. Just, S 2004) Namenda (Memantine) for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. Pharmacotherapy Update Newsletter. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland. (Available from http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/.)
10. Kosinski, A. S. Barnhart, H. X. (2003) Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests. Biometrics, 59, 163 171.
11. Mossman, D. (1999) Three-way ROCs. Med. Decsn Makng, 19, 78 89.
12. Nakas, C. T. Yiannoutsos, C. T. (2004) Ordered multiple-class ROC analysis with continuous measurements. Statist. Med., 23, 3437 3449.
13. Nakas, C. T. Yiannoutsos, C. T 2006) Ordered multiple-class ROC analysis. In Encyclopedia of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, doi 10.1081/E-EBS-120041740. Oxford: Taylor and Francis.
14. Obuchowski, N. A. (2005) Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary. Acad. Radiol., 12, 1198 1204.
15. Reisberg, B., Doody, R., Stoffler, A., Schmitt, F., Ferris, S. Mobius, H. J. (2003) Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. New Engl. J. Med., 348, 1333 1341.
16. Rotnitzky, A., Faraggi, D. Schisterman, E. (2006) Doubly robust estimation of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 101, 1276 1288.
17. Rubin, D. B. (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581 592.
18. Scurfield, B. K. (1996) Multiple-event forced-choice tasks in the theory of signal detectability. J. Math. Psychol., 40, 253 269.
19. Xiong, C., van Belle, G., Miller, J. P. Morris, J. C. (2006) Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups. Statist. Med., 25, 1251 1273.
20. Zhou, X. H. (1996) A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operation characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias. Biometrics, 52, 299 305.
21. Zhou, X. H., Obuchowski, N. A. McClish, D. K. (2002) Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. New York : Wiley.