New looks in the assessment of cognitive ability

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 6-22

  Woodcock, Richard W ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149036454     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_3     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Carroll, J. B. (1998). Human cognitive abilities: A critique. In J. J. McArdle & R. W. Woodcock (Eds.), Human cognitive abilities in theory and practice (pp. 5–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Cattell, R. B. (1941). Some theoretical issues in adult intelligence testing. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 592.
4. Dean, R. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (1999). The WJ–R and Batería–R in neuropsychological assessment: Research report number 3. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
5. Dean, R. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2003). Dean–Woodcock Neuropsychological Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
6. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harmon, M. H. (1979). Cognitive factors: Their identification and replication. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 79(2).
7. Elliot, C. D. (1990). Differential Abilities Scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
8. Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 8, 341–349.
9. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S., & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and G–Gctheory. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Flanagan, D. P., & Ortiz, S. W. (2001). Essentials of cross-battery assessment. New York: Wiley.
12. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. W., Alfonso, V., & Mascolo, J. (2002). The achievement test desk reference (ATDR): Comprehensive assessment and learning disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
14. Horn, J. L. (1965). Fluid and crystallized intelligence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign.
15. Horn, J. L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A review of theory. In K. S. McGrew, J. K. Werder, & R. W. Woodcock, WJ–R technical manual (pp. 197–232). Chicago: Riverside.
16. Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf–Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford.
17. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman N. L. (1993). The Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19. McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf–Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151–189). New York: Guilford.
20. McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): A cross-battery approach to intelligence test interpretation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive assessment system. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
22. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
23. Systat (1997a). TableCurve 2D [Computer Software]. Richmond, CA: Systat Software.
24. Systat (1997b). TableCurve 3D [Computer Software]. Richmond, CA: Systat Software.
25. Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1937). Measuring intelligence: A guide to the administration of the new revised Stanford-Binet tests of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1960). Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual for the third revision. Form L–M. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28. Thorndike, R. M., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
29. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, 1.
30. Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
31. Wechsler, D. (1949). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
32. Wechsler, D. (1955). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
33. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
34. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
35. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
36. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
37. Woodcock, R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations of the WJ–R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 231–258.
38. Woodcock, R. W. (1993). An information processing view of Gf–Gc theory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Monograph Series: Advances in Psychoeducational Assessment, Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery–Revised. Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Company.
39. Woodcock, R. W. (1994). Measures of fluid and crystallized theory of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence (pp. 452–456). New York: Macmillan.
40. Woodcock, R. W. (1997). The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability—Revised. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 230–245). New York: Guilford.
41. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). The WJ–R and Batería–R in neuropsychological assessment: Research report number 1. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
42. Woodcock, R. W. (1999). What can Rasch-based scores convey about a person’s test performance? In S. Embretson & S. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know (pp. 105–127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
43. Woodcock, R. W., & Dahl, M. N. (1971). A common scale for the measurement of person ability and test item difficulty (AGS Paper No. 10). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
44. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
45. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989a). Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement–Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
46. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989b). Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability–Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
47. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001a). Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
48. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001b). Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
49. Woodcock, R. W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F. (1993). An IRT approach to cross-language test equating and interpretation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 233–241.
50. Wright, B. D. (1968). Sample-free test calibration and person measurement. Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems (pp. 85–101). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
51. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.