When what you want is not what you get: Motivational correlates of interpersonal problems in clinical and nonclinical samples

Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1095-1119

  Holtforth, Martin Grosse ^a,b   Pincus, Aaron L ^c   Grawe, Klaus ^a   Mauler, Birgit ^d,e   Castonguay, Louis G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Christoph Dornier Klinlk ^*  (Germany)

^e Christoph Dornier Klinik   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149023382     PISSN: 07367236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.10.1095     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ackerman, S., & Hilsenroth, M. (2001). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques negatively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy, 38, 171-185.
2. Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP). Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3-4), 521-536.
3. Austin, J. T., (& Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338-375.
4. Borkovec, T. D., Newman, M. G., Pincus, A., & Lytle, R. (2002). A component analysis of cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder and the role of interpersonal problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 288-298.
5. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). The self-regulation of behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Caspar, F. (1995). Plan analysis. Toward optimizing psychotherapy. Seattle: Hogrefe.
7. DiNardo, P. A., O'Brien, G. T., Barlow, D. H., Waddell, M. T., & Blanchard, E. G. (1983). Reliability of DSM-III anxiety disorder categories using a new structured interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1070-1074.
8. Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 73-92.
9. Elliot, A. ]., Gable, S. L., & Mapes, R. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 378-391.
10. Emmons, R. A. (1996). Striving and feeling. Personal goals and subjective well-being. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 313-337). New York: Guilford.
11. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L.A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Gable, S.L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 175-222.
13. Grawe, K. (1997). Research-informed psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 7(1), 1-19.
14. Grawe, K. (2004). Psychological therapy. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
15. Grawe, K. (2007). Neuropsychatherapy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Greenberg, L.S. (2001). Emotion-focused therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Grosse Holtforth, M., Bents, H., Mauler, B., & Grawe, K. (2006). Interpersonal distress as a mediator between avoidance goals and goal satisfaction in psychotherapy inpatients. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 172-182.
18. Grosse Holtforth, M., & Castonguay, L. G. (2005). Relationship and techniques in CBT - A motivational approach. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(4), 443-455.
19. Grosse Holtforth, M., & Grawe, K. (2000). Fragebogen zur Analyse Motivationaler Schemata (FAMOS). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 29(3), 170-179. [Questionnaire for the Analysis of Motivational Schemas (FAMOS)]
20. Grosse Holtforth, M., & Grawe, K. (2002). Bern Inventory of Treatment Goals (BIT), Part 1: Development and first application of a taxonomy of treatment goal themes (BIT-T). Psychotherapy Research, 22(1), 79-99.
21. Grosse Holtforth, M., & Grawe, K. (2003). Der Inkongruenzfragebogen (INK)-Ein Messinstrument zur Analyse motivationaler Inkongruenz. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32(4), 315-323.
22. Grosse Holtforth, M., Lutz, W., & Grawe, K. (2006). The structural stability of the IIP-C pre- and posttreatment: A replication using a Swiss clinical sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 98-103.
23. Gurtman, M.B. (1991). Evaluating the interpersonalness of personality scales. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 670-677.
24. Gurtman, M.B. (1996). Interpersonal problems and the psychotherapy context: The construct validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP). Psychological Assessment, 8, 241-255.
25. Gurtman, M.B., & Pincus, A.L. (2003). The circumplex model: Methods and research applications. In J. Schinka & W. Velicer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, volume tzvo: Research methods in psychology (pp. 407-428). New York: Wiley.
26. Hmel, B.A., &c Pincus, A.L. (2002). The meaning of automomy: On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 70, 277-310.
27. Horowitz, L. M. (1979). On the cognitive structure of interpersonal problems treated in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47(1), 5-15.
28. Horowitz, L. M. (1996). The study of interpersonal problems: A Leary legacy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 283-300.
29. Horowitz, L. M. (2004). Interpersonalfoundations of psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Horowitz, L. M., Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2000). Inventory of interpersonal problems manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Corporation.
31. Horowitz, L. M., & de Sales French, R. (1979). Interpersonal problems of people who describe themselves as lonely. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 762-764.
32. Horowitz, L. M., de Sales French, R., Gani, M., & Lapid, J.S. (1980). The co-occurrence of semantically similar interpersonal problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 413-415.
33. Horowitz, L. M., Dryer, D. C., & Krasnoperova, E. N. (1997). The circumplex structure of interpersonal problems. In R. Litchi & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP): Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
35. Horowitz, L. M., Strauss, B., & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar zur Erfassung Interpersonaler Probleme (HP-D)-Deutsche Version (2 ed.). Göttingen: Beltz. [IIP, German version]
36. Horowitz, L.M., Wilson, K.R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M.J., & Henderson, L. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 67-86.
37. Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.
38. Leahy, R. L. (2001). Overcoming resistance in cognitive therapy. New York: Guilford.
39. Leary, T. F. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York: Ronald Press.
40. Locke, K.D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249-267.
41. Maling, M.S., Gurtman, M.B., & Howard, K.I. (1995). The response of interpersonal problems to varying doses of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 63-75.
42. Margraf, J., Schneider, S., & Ehlers, A. (1994). DIPS: Diagnostisches Interview bei psychischen Störungen. Berlin: Springer. [Diagnostic interview for mental disorders]
43. Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
44. Muran, J. C., Segal, Z. V., Samstag, L. W., & Crawford, C. E. (1994). Patientpretreatmentinterpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in short-term cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 185-190.
45. Pincus, A.L. (2005). A contemporary integrative interpersonal theory of personality disorders. In J. Clarkin & M. Lenzenweger (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (2nd Ed., pp. 282-331). New York: Guilford.
46. Pincus, A.L., & Ansell, E. B. (2003). Interpersonal theory of personality. In T. Milion & M. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 209-229). New York: Wiley.
47. Pincus, A.L., & Gurtman, M.B. (1995). The three faces of interpersonal dependency: Structural analyses of self-report dependency measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 744-758.
48. Pincus, A.L., & Gurtman, M.B. (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex: Evolving perspectives on normal and abnormal personality. In S. Strack (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (2nd Ed., pp. 83-111). New York: Springer.
49. Pincus, A.L., Gurtman, M.B., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2006, May). Circular reasoning about interpersonal behavior: II. Interpersonal dispositions, interpersonal problems, and psychological distress. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the Society for Interpersonal Theory and Research (SITAR) in Philadelphia, USA.
50. Pincus, A. L., Gurtman, M. B., & Ruiz, M. A. (1998). Structural analysis of social behavior (SASB): Circumplex analyses and structural relations with the interpersonal circle and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1629-1645.
51. Pincus, A. L., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Interpersonal problems and conceptions of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 342-352.
52. Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.
53. Puschner, B., Kraft, S., & Bauer, S. (2004). Interpersonal problems and outcome in outpatient psychotherapy: Findings from a long-term longitudinal study in Germany. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(3), 223-234.
54. Reiss, S., & Havercamp, S. (1996). The sensitivity theory of motivation: Implications for psychopathology. Behavavioral Research and Therapy, 34(8), 621-632.
55. Ruiz, M.A., Pincus, A.L., Borkovec, T.D., Echemendia, R.J., Castonguay, L.G., & Ragusea, S.A. (2004). Validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) for predicting treatment outcome: An investigation with the Pennsylvania Practice Research Network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 213-222.
56. Tracey, T. J. G., Rounds, J., & Gurtman, M. (1996). Examination of the general factor with the interpersonal circumplex structure: Application to the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(4), 441-466.
57. Vittengl, J. R., Clark, L. A., & Jarret, R. B. (2003). Interpersonal problems, personality pathology, and social adjustment after cognitive therapy for depression. Psychological Assessment, 15(1), 29-40.
58. Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. Grove & D. C. Ciccetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Volume 2, Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
59. Wiggins, J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Guilford.
60. Wiggins, J. S., & Broughton, R. (1985). The interpersonal circle: A structural model for the integration of personality research. In R. Hogan & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 1-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
61. Wiggins, J. S., & Broughton, R. (1991). A geometric taxonomy of personality scales. European Journal of Personality, 5, 343-365.
62. Wittchen, H.-U., Zaudig, M., & Fydrich, T. (1997). Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID). Göttingen: Hogrefe.