Testing the performance of a forest ecosystem model (FORECAST) against 29 years of field data in a Pseudotsuga menziesii plantation

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1808-1820

  Blanco, Juan A ^a   Seely, Brad ^a   Welham, Clive ^a   Kimmins, J P ^a   Seebacher, Tanya M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEMS; NUTRIENTS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FACTORIAL THINNING; PLANTATION; STEM DENSITY;

FORESTRY;

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; ALLOMETRY; CALIBRATION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY MODELING; MODEL VALIDATION; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PLANTATION FORESTRY; THINNING;

BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; NUTRIENTS; PLANTS; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; SHAWNIGAN LAKE; VANCOUVER ISLAND;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 38149022483     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X07-041     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aber, J.D. 1997. Why don't we believe the models? Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 78: 232-233.
2. Barclay, H.J., Pang, P.C., and Pollard, D.F.W. 1986. Above-ground biomass distribution within trees and stands in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 438-442.
3. Beaudet, M., Messier, C., and Canham, C.D. 2002. Predictions of understorey light conditions in northern hardwood forests following parameterization, sensitivity analysis, and test of the SORTIE light model. For. Ecol. Manag. 165: 235-248.
4. Blanco, J.A., Zavala, M.A., Imbert, J.B., and Castillo, F.J. 2005. Sustainability of forest management practices: evaluation through a simulation model of nutrient cycling. For. Ecol. Manag. 213: 209-228.
5. British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 1976. Whole-stem cubic metre volume equations and tables, 1976. B.C. Forest Serice, Victoria, B.C.
6. Brix, H. 1983. Effects of thinning and nitrogen fertilization on growth of Douglas-fir: relative contribution of foliage quantity and efficiency. Can. J. For. Res. 13: 167-175.
7. Brown, T.N., and Kulasiri, D. 1996. Validating models of complex, stochastic, biological systems. Ecol. Model. 86: 129-134. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(95)00039-9.
8. Chambers, P.A., Guy, M., Roberts, E., Charlton, M.N., Kent, R., Gagnon, G., Grove, G., and Foster, N. 2001. Nutrients and their impact on the Canadian Environment. Agriculture and Agric.-Food Canada, Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Health Canada and Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
9. Clark, D., Brown, S., Kicklighter, D.W., Chambers, J.Q., Thomlinson, J.R., and Ni, J. 2001. Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecol. Appl. 11: 356-370. doi:10.2307/3060894.
10. Cole, D.W. 1986. Nutrient cycle in world forests. In Forest site and productivity. Edited by S.P. Gessel. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 104-115.
11. Crown, M., and Brett, C.P. 1975. Fertilization and thinning effects on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: an establishment report. Can. For. Serv. Pac. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. BC-X-110.
12. Duursma, R.A. 2004. A simple process-based model of forest growth, and a test for the Priest River Experimental Forest. Ph.D. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.
13. Ek, A.R., and Monserud, R.A. 1979. Performance and comparison of stand growth models based on individual tree and diameter-class growth. Can. J. For. Res. 9: 231-244.
14. Freese, F. 1960. Testing accuracy. For. Sci. 6: 139-145.
15. Gardner, R.H., and Urban, D.L. 2003. Model validation and testing: past lessons, present concerns, future prospects. In Models in ecosystem science. Edited by C.D. Canham, J.J. Cole, and W.K. Lauenroth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. pp. 184-203.
16. Hasenauer, H., Burkhart, H.E., and Amateis, R.L. 1997. Basal area development in thinned and unthinned loblolly pine plantations. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 265-271. doi:10.1139/cjfr-27-2-265.
17. Hawkins, B.J., and Henry, G. 1999. Nutrition and bud removal affect biomass and nutrient allocation in Douglas-fir and western red cedar. Tree Physiol. 19: 197-203.
18. He, F., and Barclay, H.J. 2000. Long-term response of understory plant species to thinning and fertilization in a Douglas-fir plantation on southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 566-572. doi:10.1139/cjfr-30-4-566.
19. Johnsen, K., Samuelson, L., Teskey, R., McNulty, S., and Fox, T. 2001. Process models as tools in forestry research and management. For. Sci. 47: 2-8.
20. Ketterings, Q.M., Coe, R., van Noordwijk, M., Ambagau, Y., and Palm, C.A. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predictive above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 146: 199-209.
21. Kimmins, J.P., Mailly, D., and Seely, B. 1999. Modelling forest ecosystem net primary production: the hybrid simulation approach used in FORECAST. Ecol. Model. 122: 195-224. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00138-6.
22. Kirschbaum, M.U.F. 1999. CenW, a forest growth model with linked carbon, energy, nutrient and water cycles. Ecol. Model. 118: 17-59. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00020-4.
23. Klopatek, J.M. 2002. Below-ground carbon pools and processes in different age stands of Douglas-fir. Tree Physiol. 22: 197-204.
24. Korzukhin, M.D., Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., and Wagner, R. 1996. Process versus empirical models: which approach for forest management? Can. J. For. Res. 26: 879-887.
25. Kurz, W.A., and Kimmins, J.P. 1987. Influence of site quality on tree resource allocation to fine roots and its effect on harvestable productivity of coastal Douglas-fir stands. For. Can. B.C. Minist. For. FRDA Rep. No. 034.
26. Landsberg, J.J. 2003. Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 385-397. doi:10.1139/x02-129.
27. Landsberg, J.J., Waring, R.H., and Coops, N.C. 2003. Performance of the forest productivity model 3-PG applied to a wide range of forest types. For. Ecol. Manag. 172: 199-214.
28. Lasch, P., Badeck, F.-W., Suckow, F., Lindner, M., and Mohr, P. 2005. Model-based analysis of management alternatives at stand and regional level in Brandenburg (Germany). For. Ecol. Manag. 207: 59-74.
29. Leary, R.A. 1997. Testing models of unthinned red pine plantation dynamics using a modified Bakuzis matrix of stand properties. Ecol. Model. 98: 35-46.
30. Linder, M., Sievänen, R., and Pretzsch, H. 1997. Improving the simulation of stand structure in a forest gap model. For. Ecol. Manag. 95: 183-195.
31. Loehle, C. 1997. A hypothesis testing framework for evaluating ecosystem model performance. Ecol. Model. 97: 153-165. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(96) 01900-X.
32. Lucas, N.S., Curran, P.J., Plummer, S.E., and Danson, F.M. 2000. Estimating the stem carbon production of a coniferous forest using an ecosystem model driven by the remotely sensed red edge. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21: 619-631.
33. Mayer, D.G., and Butler, D.G. 1993. Statistical validation. Ecol. Model. 68: 21-32. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(93)90105-2.
34. McDowell, N.G., Blaster, N.K., and Marshall, J.D. 2001. Below-ground carbon allocation of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 1425-1436. doi:10.1139/cjfr-31-8-1425.
35. McWilliams, E.R.G., and Thérien, G. 1997. Fertilization and thinning effects on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: 24-year growth response. For. Can. B.C. Minist. For. FRDA Rep. No. 269.
36. Merganicová, K., Pietsch, S.A., and Hasenauer, H. 2005. Testing mechanistic modeling to assess impacts of biomass removal. For. Ecol. Manag. 207: 37-57.
37. Messier, C., and Mitchell, A.K. 1994. Effects of thinning in a 43-year-old Douglas-fir stand on above- and below-ground biomass allocation and leaf structure of understory Gaultheria shallon. For. Ecol. Manag. 68: 263-271.
38. Mitchell, A.K., Barclay, H.J., Brix, H., Pollard, D.F.W., Benton, R., and deJong, R. 1996. Biomass and nutrient element dynamics in Douglas-fir: effects of thinning and nitrogen fertilization over 18 years. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 376-388.
39. Monserud, R.A. 2003. Evaluating forest models in a sustainable forest management context. FBMIS, 1: 35-47.
40. Morris, D.M., Kimmins, J.P., and Duckert, D.R. 1997. The use of soil organic matter as a criterion of the relative sustainability of forest management alternatives: a modelling approach using FORECAST. For. Ecol. Manag. 94: 61-78.
41. Ollinger, S.V., Aber, J.D., and Federer, C.A. 1998. Estimating regional forest productivity and water yield using an ecosystem model linked to a GIS. Landscape Ecol. 13: 323-334. doi:10.1023/A:1008004423783.
42. Omule, S.A.Y., Fletcher, V.E., and Polsson, K.R. 1987. Total and merchantable volume equations for small coastal Douglas-fir. For. Can. B.C. Minist. For. FRDA Rep. No. 010.
43. Oreskes, N. 2003. The role of Quantitative models in science. In Models in ecosystem science. Edited by C.D. Canham, J.J. Cole, and W.K. Lauenroth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. pp. 13-31.
44. Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitz, K. 1994. Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science (Wash., D.C.), 263: 641-646. doi:10.1126/science.263.5147.641.
45. Pang, P.C., Barclay, H.J., and McCullough, K. 1987. Aboveground nutrient distribution within trees and stands in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 1379-1384.
46. Parresol, B.R. 1999. Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons. For. Sci. 45: 573-593.
47. Paruelo, J.M., Jobbagy, E.G., Sala, O.E., Lauenroth, W.K., and Burke, I.C. 1998. Functional and structural convergence of temperate grassland and shrubland ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 8: 194-206. doi:10.2307/2641321.
48. Popper, K.R. 1963. Conjectures and refutations. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, U.K.
49. Power, M. 1993. The predictive validation of ecological and environment models. Ecol. Model. 68: 33-50. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(93)90106-3.
50. Prescott, C.E., Blevins, L.L., and Staley, C.L. 2000a. Effects of clearcutting on decomposition rates of litter and forest floor in forests of British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1751-1757. doi:10.1139/cjfr-30- 11-1751.
51. Prescott, C.E., Chappell, H.N., and Vesterdal, L. 2000b. Nitrogen turnover in forest floors of coastal Douglas-fir at sites differing in soil nitrogen capital. Ecology, 81: 1878-1886. doi:10.2307/177278.
52. Prescott, C.E., Zabek, L.M., Staley, C.L., and Kabzems, R. 2000c. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, and litter mixtures. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1742-1750. doi:10.1139/cjfr-30-11-1742.
53. Rauscher, H.M., Lloyd, F.T., Loftis, D.L., and Twery, M.J. 2000. A practical decision-analysis process for ecosystem management. Comput. Electron. Agric. 27: 195-226. doi:10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00108-3.
54. Reynolds, M.R. 1984. Estimating the error in model predictions. For. Sci. 30: 454-469.
55. Robinson, A.P., and Froese, R.E. 2004. Model validation using equivalence tests. Ecol. Model. 176: 349-358. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.013.
56. Robinson, A.P., Duursma, R., and Marshall, J.D. 2005. A regression-based equivalence test for model validation: shifting the burden of proof. Tree Physiol. 25: 903-913.
57. Rose, K.A., and Smith, E.P. 1998. Statistical assessment of model goodness-of-fit using permutation tests. Ecol. Model. 106: 129-139. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00188-9.
58. Rykiel, E.J. 1996. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol. Model. 90: 229-244. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(95)00152-2.
59. Sachs, D., and Trofymow, J.A. 1991. Testing the performance of FORCYTE-11 against results from the Shawnigan Lake thinning and fertilization trials in Douglas-Fir. Can. For. Serv. Pac. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. BC-X-324.
60. SAS Institute Inc. 2002. JMP 5.0.1 user's manual. SAS Institute Inc., SAS Campus Drive, Cary, N.C.
61. Seely, B. 2004. Partial calibration and verification of FORECAST for CWH forest types (in support of the LLEMS project) using output from TASS/TIPSY. Prepared for International Forest Products Ltd., Vancouver, B.C.
62. Seely, B., and Welham, C. 2006. Towards the application of SOM as a measure of ecosystem productivity in the Quesnel Forest District: deriving thresholds, determining effective sampling regimes, and evaluating practices. Rep. FSP Y061143. Prepared for British Columbia Ministry of Forests Forest Sciences Program, Victoria, B.C.
63. Seely, B., Kimmins, J.P., Welham, C., and Scoullar, K.A. 1999. Ecosystem management models: defining stand-level sustainability exploring stand-level stewardship. J. For. 97: 4-10.
64. Seely, B., Welham, C., and Kimmins, H. 2002. Carbon sequestration in a boreal forest ecosystem: results from the ecosystem simulation model, FORECAST. For. Ecol. Manag. 169: 123-135.
65. Seely, B., Nelson, J., Wells, R., Peter, B., Meitner, M., Anderson, A., Harshaw, H., Sheppard, S., Bunnell, F.L., Kimmins, H., and Harrison, D. 2004. The application of a hierarchical, decision-support system to evaluate multi-objective forest management strategies: a case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 199: 283-305.
66. Smith, E.P., and Rose, K.A. 1995. Model goodness-of-fit analysis using regression and related techniques. Ecol. Model. 77: 59-64.
67. Smith, P., Smith, J.U., Powlson, D.S., McGill, W.B., Arah, J.R.M., Chertov, O.G., Coleman, K., Franko, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D.S., Jensen, L.S., Kelly, R.H., Klein-Gunnewiek, H., Komarov, A.S., Li, C., Molina, J.A.E., Mueller, T., Parton, W.J., Thornley, J.H.M., and Whitmore, A.P. 1997. A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma, 81: 153-225. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00087-6.
68. Soares, P., Tomé, M., Skovsgaard, J.P., and Vanclay, J.K. 1995. Evaluating a growth model for forest management using continuous forest inventory data. For. Ecol. Manag. 71: 251-265.
69. Sollins, P., Grier, C.C., McCorison, F.M., Cromack, K., Fogel, R., and Fredriksen, R.L. 1980. The internal element cycles of an old-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem in western Oregon. Ecol. Monogr. 50: 261-285. doi:10.2307/2937252.
70. Standish, J.T., Manning, G.H., and Demaershalk, J.P. 1985. Development of biomass equations for British Columbia tree species. Can. For. Serv. Pac. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. BC-X-264.
71. Stanek, W., Beddows, D., and State, D. 1979. Fertilization and thinning effects on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake on Vancouver Island. Some observations on salal and Bracken Fern undergrowth. Can. For. Serv. Pac. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. BC-R-1.
72. Sterba, H., and Monserud, R.A. 1997. Applicability of the forest stand growth simulator PROGNAUS for the Austrian part of the Bohemian Massif. Ecol. Model. 98: 23-34. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(96)01934-5.
73. Sterman, J. 2002. All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 18: 501-531.
74. Taylor, B.R., Prescott, C.E., Parsons, W.F.J., and Parkinson, D. 1991. Substrate control of litter decomposition in four Rock Mountain coniferous forests. Can. J. Bot. 69: 2242-2250.
75. Theil, H. 1966. Applied econometric forecasting. North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
76. Trofymow, J.A., Barclay, H.J., and McCullough, K.M. 1991. Annual rates and elemental concentrations of litter fall in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1601-1615.
77. Vanclay, J.K., and Skovsgaard, J.P. 1997. Evaluating forest growth models. Ecol. Model. 98: 1-12. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(96)01932-1.
78. Wei, X., Kimmins, J.P., and Zhou, G. 2003. Disturbances and the sustainability of long-term site productivity in lodgepole pine forests in the central interior of British Columbia - an ecosystem modeling approach. Ecol. Model. 164: 239-256. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00062-0.
79. Welham, C., Seely, B., and Kimmins, H. 2002. The utility of the two-pass harvesting system: an analysis using the ecosystem simulation model FORECAST. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 1071-1079. doi:10.1139/x02-029.
80. Welham, C., Van Rees, K., Seely, B., and Kimmins, H. 2007. Projected long-term productivity in Saskatchewan hybrid poplar plantations: weed competition and fertilizer effects. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 356-370.
81. Wellek, S. 2003. Testing statistical hypothesis of equivalence. Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.
82. Yamasaki, S.H., Kneeshaw, D.D., and Munson, A.D. 2001. Integrating socio-economic and ecological indicators of sustainability: bridging boundaries between groups and fields of expertise. Sustainable Forest Management Network Workshop, 9-11 February 2001, Trois-Rivières, Qué. Proceedings No. 2001-6. Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, Alta.
83. Yang, Y., Monserud, R.A., and Huang, S. 2004. An evaluation of diagnostic tests and their roles in validating forest biometric models. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 619-629. doi:10.1139/x03-230.