Interparty attitudes in Chile: Coalitions as superordinate social identities

Political Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-118

  González, Roberto ^a   Manzi, Jorge ^a   Saiz, José L ^b   Brewer, Marilynn ^c   De Tezanos Pinto, Pablo ^a   Torres, David ^a   Aravena, María Teresa ^a   Aldunate, Nerea ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA   (Chile)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intergroup attitude; Party and coalition identity; Political identity threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149006876     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00614.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
2. Baron, R.M. Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 1182.
3. Bastien, D. T. (1987). Common patterns of behavior and communication in corporate mergers and acquisitions. Human Resource Management, 26, 17 34.
4. Breakwell, G. M. (1978). Some effects of marginal social identity. In H. Tajfel (Ed Differentiation between social groups (pp. 301 336). London : Academic.
5. Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307 324.
6. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475 482.
7. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues 55 (3 429 444.
8. Brewer, M. B. Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller M. B. Brewer (Eds Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281 302). Orlando : Academic Press.
9. Brewer, M. B. Miller, N. (1988). Contact and cooperation: When do they work? In P. Katz D. Taylor (Eds Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 315 26). New York : Plenum Press.
10. Brewer, M. Roccas, S. (2001). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. In M. Brewer C. Sedikides (Eds Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 219 237). New York : Psychology Press.
11. Brown, R. Ross, G. F. (1982). The battle for acceptance: An investigation into the dynamics of intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 155 178). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
12. Brown, R. J. Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 37, pp. 255 343). New York : Elsevier.
13. Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533 546.
14. Centro de Estudios Públicos 2002). Estudio Nacional de Opinión Pública, Julio 2002. Text available on-line: http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/archivo_3126/graficos_ddet339.ppt.
15. Centro de Estudios Públicos 2003). Estudio Nacional de Opinión Pública, Diciembre, 2003. Text available on-line: http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/archivo_32251/graficos_ddet353.ppt.
16. Cook, S. W. (1984). Cooperative interaction in multiethnic contexts. In N. Miller M. B. Brewer (Eds Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 291 302). Orlando : Academic Press.
17. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Isen, A. M. Lowrance, R. (1995). Group representation and intergroup bias: Positive affect similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 856 865.
18. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L. Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup bias, status, differentiation, and a common ingroup identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 109 120.
19. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B. Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefits of re-categorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 401 442.
20. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. In W. Stroebe M. Hewstone (Eds European review of social psychology, 4, 27 57. Chichester : John Wiley.
21. Gaertner, S. L. Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity. New York : Hove.
22. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J., Rust, M., Nier, J., Banker, B., Ward, C., Mottola, G. Houlette, M. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388 402.
23. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A. Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239 249.
24. Giles, H. (1977). Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations. London : Academic Press.
25. González, R. Brown, R. J. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195 214.
26. González, R. Brown, R. J. (2006). Dual identities in intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 753 767.
27. Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20, 393 404.
28. Hornsey, M. J. Hogg, M. A. (2000a). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 26, 242 256.
29. Hornsey, M. J. Hogg, M. A. (2000b). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143 156.
30. Kelly, C. (1990). Social identity and levels of influence: When a political minority fails. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 289 301.
31. Lupia, A. Strøm, K. (1995). Coalition termination and strategic timing of parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review, 89, 648 665.
32. Moghaddam, F. M. Stringer, P. (1988). Outgroup similarity and intergroup bias. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 105 115.
33. Mullen, B., Brown, R. Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103 122.
34. Pickett, C. L. Brewer, M. B. (2001). Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived ingroup and outgroup homogeneity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 341 348.
35. Riker, W. H. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven : Yale University Press.
36. Sachdev, I. Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1 24.
37. Sachdev, I. Bourhis, R. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1 24.
38. Schofield, T. (1993). Political competition and multiparty coalition government. European Journal of Political Research, 23, 1 33.
39. Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
40. Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed Differentiation between social groups (pp. 27 60). San Diego : Academic Press.
41. Tajfel, H. Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin S. Worchel (Eds The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33 48). Monterey : Brooks/Cole.
42. Tajfel, H. Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel W. Austin (Eds Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7 24). Chicago : Nelson-Hall.
43. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149 78.