Using phylogenetic, genetic and demographic evidence for setting conservation priorities for Mexican rare pines

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 121-137

  Delgado, Patricia ^a,b   Eguiarte, Luís Enrique ^c   Molina Freaner, Francisco ^c   Alvarez Buylla, Elena R ^c   Piñero, Daniel ^c  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE YUCATÁN   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA DE SAN NICOLÁS DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

^c INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Conservation indices; Endangered plants; Mexico; Pinus; Rare species

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EVERGREEN TREE; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; PHYLOGENETICS; RARE SPECIES; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); SPECIES CONSERVATION;

PINUS LAGUNAE; PINUS MURICATA; PINUS PINCEANA; PINUS RZEDOWSKII;

EID: 38149004192     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9234-y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alvarez-Buylla ER, Chaos A, Piñero D, Garay AA (1996a) Demographic genetic of a pioneer tropical tree species: patch dynamics, seed dispersal, and seed banks. Evolution 50:1155-1166
2. Alvarez-Buylla ER, Garcia-Barrios R, Lara-Moreno C, Martinez Ramos M (1996b) Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: applications and perspectives for tropical rain forest trees. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:387-421
3. Arita H, Santos del Prado K (1999) Conservation biology of nectar-feeding bats in Mexico. J Mammal 80:31-41
4. Arriaga L, Díaz S, Mercado C (1994) Conservation or commercial management of temperature forest of Baja California Sur, México. Conserv Biol 8:1132-1140
5. Austin MP (1991) Vegetation theory in relation to cost-efficient surveys. In: Margules CR, Austin MP (eds) Nature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia, pp 17-22
6. Barrett SCH, Kohn JR (1991) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1-30
7. Ceska JF, Affolter JM, Hamrick JL (1997) Developing a sampling strategy for Baptisia arachnifera based allozyme diversity. Conserv Biol 11:1133-1139
8. Crozier RH (1992) Genetic diversity and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 61:11-15
9. Delgado P, Piñero D, Chaos A, Perez NN, Alvarez-Buylla ER (1999) High population differentiation and genetic variation in the endangered Mexican pine, Pinus rzedowskii (Madrigal et Caballero). Am J Bot 86:669-676
10. Eguiarte LE, Larson-Guerra J, Nuñez-Farfán J, Martínez-Palacios A, Santos del Prado K, Arita HT (1999) Diversidad filogenética y conservación: ejemplos a diferentes escalas y una propuesta a nivel poblacional para Agave victoria-reginae en el desierto de Chihuahaua, México. Rev Chil Hist Nat 72:475-492
11. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217-242
12. Escalante AE (2001) Estructura genética de poblaciones de Pinus pinceana G. Gordon, usando como marcadores moleculares microsatélites de cloroplasto (cpSSŔs). Dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
13. Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1-10
14. Farjon A, Styles BT (1997) Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica, Monograph 75. New York Botanical Garden, New York
15. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies; an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791
16. Fjeldså J (2000) The relevance of systematics in choosing priority areas for clonal conservation. Environ Conserv 27:67-75
17. Frankel OH, Soule ME (1981) Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom
18. Gernandt DS, Geada LG, Ortíz GS, Liston A (2005) Phylogeny and classification of Pinus. Taxon 54:29-42
19. Hamrick JL, Loveless MD (1986) Isozyme variation in tropical trees: techniques and preliminary results. Biotropica 18:201-207
20. Hamrick JL, Godt MJ, Murawski DA, Loveless MD (1991) Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: implications for conservation biology. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 75-86
21. Holsinger EK, Gottlieb LD (1991) Conservation of rare and endangered plants: principles and prospects. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 195-208
22. Humphries C, Vane-Wrigth D, Williams P (1991) Biodiversity reserves: setting new priorities for the conservation of wildlife. Parks 2:34-38
23. Lande R, (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455-1459
24. Ledig FT, Capo-Arteaga MA, Hodgskiss PD, Sbay H, Flores-López C, Bermejo-Velázquez B (2001) Genetic diversity and the mating system of a rare Mexican piñon, Pinus pinceana and a comparison with Pinus maximartinezii (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 88:1977-1987
25. May RM (1990) Taxonomy as destiny. Nature 347:129-130
26. Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol Conserv 43:663-676
27. Mickevich MF, Platnick NI (1989) On the information content of classifications. Cladistics 5:33-47
28. Millar CI (1986) The Californian closed cone pines (Subsection oocarpa Little and Critchfield): a taxonomic history and review. Taxon 35:657-670
29. Millar CI, Critchfield WB (1988) Crossability and relation-ships of Pinus muricata (Pinaceae). Madroño 35:39-53
30. Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA), 1.3: A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular populations genetic data. http://www.marksgeneticsoftware.net/tfpga.htm
31. Molina-Freaner F, Delgado P, Piñero D, Pérez-Nasser N, Alvarez-Buylla ER (2001) Do rare pines need different conservation strategies? Evidence from three Mexican rare species. Can J Bot 79:131-138
32. Moritz C (1996) Uses of molecular phylogenies for conservation. In: Harvey PH, Leigh Brow AJ, Maynard SJ (eds) New uses for new phylogenies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 2003-216
33. Moritz C, Faith CP (1998) Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation. Mol Ecol 7:419-429
34. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individual. Genetics 90:589-590
35. Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355-364
36. ÓMeally D, Colgan DJ (2005) Genetic ranking for biological conservation using information from multiple species. Biol Conserv 122:395-407
37. Passini MF, Pinel N (1989) Ecology and distribution of Pinus lagunae in the Sierra de la Laguna, Baja California Sur, México. Madroño 36:84-92
38. Perry JP (1991) The pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon
39. Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844-855
40. Quijada M, Liston A, Delgado P, Vázquez-Lobo AY, Alvarez-Buylla ER (1998) Variation in the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal trascribed spacer (ITS) and 5.8S region in Pinus rzedowskii. Theor Appl Genet 96:539-544
41. Santos del Prado KS (1996) Diversidad y conservación de mamíferos en México: Un enfoque taxonómico y filogenético. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
42. Statsoft Inc (2001) STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), version 6. http://www.Statsoft.com
43. Toro MA, Caballero A (2005) Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:1367-1378
44. Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 55:235-254
45. Williams PH, Humphries CJ, Vane-Wright RI (1991) Measuring biodiversity: taxonomic relatedness for conservation priorities. Aust Syst Bot 4:665-679