Parallel activities in the classroom

Language and Education

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 487-501

  Koole, Tom ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Central activity; Classroom interaction; Parallel activity; Student student interaction; Teacher student interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149000759     PISSN: 09500782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2167/le713.0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alton-Lee, A., Graham, N. and Patrick, J. (1993) Reframing classroom research: A lesson from the private world of children. Harvard Educational Review 63, 50-83.
2. Berenst, J., Hajer, M. and Koole, T. (2001) Leerlingcategoriseringen en klasse-interactie [Student categories and classroom interaction]. Tijdschrift voor Thalbeheersing 23 (3), 178-198.
3. Bierman, G. (2002) Verschillen in participatie in de centrale interactie. Een analyse van vier leerlingen. [Differences in participation in central interaction. An analysis of four students]. Research paper, Instituut Nederlands, Universiteit Utrecht.
4. Bloome, D. and Theodorou, E. (1988) Analyzing teacher-student and student-student discourse. In J.L. Greenand J.O. Harker (eds) Multiple Perspectives in Classroom Discourse (pp. 217-248). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Bloome, D., Carter, S.P., Christian, B.M., Otto, S. and Shuart-Faris, N. (2005) Discourse Analysis and the Study of Classroom Language and Literacy Events. A Microethnigraphic Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Candela, A. (1999) Students' power in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education 10 (2), 139-163.
7. Castanheira, M.L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C.N. and Green, J.L. (2001) Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education 11 (4), 353-400.
8. Cazden, C.B. (1988) Classroom Discourse. The Langugae of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Conradi, F. and Schopman, K. (2002) Een onderzoek naar de participatie van individuele leerlingen in de interactie tijdens de wiskundeles in de multiculturele klas [An investigation of participation of individual students in math class interaction in a multi-cultural school]. Research paper, Instituut Nederlands, Universiteit Utrecht.
10. Duranti, A. (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Edwards, A.D. and Westgate, D.P.G. (1994) Investigating Classroom Talk. London: Routledge/Falmer.
12. Edwards, J.A. and Lampert, M.D. (eds) (1993) Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Egbert, M.M. (1993) Schisming: The transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. PhD dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
14. Egbert, M.M. (1997) Schisming: The transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30(1), 1-51.
15. Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. (1986) Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur Schulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
16. Elbers, E., Hajer, M., Koole, T., Jonkers, M. and Prenger, J. (2002) Leerzame tweege-sprekken: Individuele begeleiding in multiculturele klassen [Instructive dialogues: individual supervision in multicultural classes]. Pedagogiek 22 (2), 159-171.
17. Ford, C.E. (1999) Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32 (4), 369-408.
18. Garfinkel, H. (1984 [1967]) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organisation of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
20. Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Green, J.L. and Bloome, D. (1997) Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situated perspective. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath and D. Lapp (eds) Handbook of Research of Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts (pp. 181-202). New York: MacMillan.
22. Green, J.L., Weade, R. and Graham, K. (1988) Lesson construction and student participation: A sociolinguistic analysis. In. J.L. Green and J.O. Harker (eds) Multiple Perspectives in Classroom Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B. and Larson, J. (1995) Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review 65, 445-471.
24. Haarhuis, J. and van Spronsen, E. (2002) Een onderzoek naar de ordehandhaving van een wiskunde- en een biologieleraar in het voortgezet onderwijs [An investigation of order keeping by a math and a biology teacher in secondary education]. Research paper, Instituut Nederlands, Universiteit Utrecht.
25. Heath, S.B. (1983) Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Heller, M. and Martin-Jones, M. (eds) (2001) Voices of Authority. Education and Linguistic Difference. Westport, CT: Ablex.
27. Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. Hicks, D. (1995) Discourse, learning and teaching. Review of Research in Education 21, 50-95.
29. Jones, R. and Thomborrow, J. (2004) Floors, talk and the organisation of classroom activities. Language in Society 44, 399-423.
30. Koole, T. (2003) The interactive construction of heterogeneity in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 14(1), 3-26.
31. Koschmann, T. (ed.) (1999) Special issue on student collaboration. Discourse Processes 27 (2).
32. McHoul, A.W. (1978) The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7, 183-213.
33. Mehan, H. (1979) Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34. Mehan, H. (1998) The study of social interaction in educational settings: Accomplishments and unresolved issues. Human Development 41, 245-269.
35. Mets, B. and van den Hauwe, J. (2003) Avoiding linguistic heterogeneity in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 14 (1), 51-68.
36. Ochs, E. (1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin (eds) Developmental Pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
37. Philips, S. (1983) The Invisible Culture: Communication in Classroom and Community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. New York: Longman.
38. Rampton, B. (2006) Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4), 696-735.
40. Sahlström, F. (1999) Up the Hill Backwards: On Interactional Constraints and Affordances for Equity-constitution in the Classrooms of the Swedish Comprehensive School. Uppsala University: Uppsala Studies in Education 85.
41. Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group (1992a) Constructing literacy in classrooms: Literate action as social accomplishment. In H.H. Marshall (ed.) Redefining Student Learning: Roots of Educational Change (pp. 119-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group (1992b) Do you see what we see? The referential and intertextual nature of classroom life. Journal of Classroom Interaction 27 (2), 29-36.
43. Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
44. Tuyay, S., Jennings, L. and Dixon, C. (1995) Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third-grade classroom. Discourse Processes 19, 75-110.
45. van Eerde, D., Hajer, M., Koole, T. and Prenger, J. (2002) Betekenisconstructie in de wiskundeles. De samenhang tussen interactief wiskunde- en taalonderwijs. [Construction of meaning in the math lesson. The relation between interactive math and language treaching]. Pedagogiek 22 (2), 134-147.