UK Alcohol Treatment Trial: Client-treatment matching effects

Addiction

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 228-238

  Heather, Nick ^a   Copello, Alex ^a,b   Godfrey, Christine ^a   Hodgson, Ray ^a,c   Orford, Jim ^a   Raistrick, Duncan ^a,b   Russell, Ian ^a   Tober, Gillian ^a   Slegg, Gary Paul ^a   Morton, Veronica ^a  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Research and Clinical Management   (United Kingdom)

^c Research and Clinical Management

Author keywords

Alcohol; Alcohol dependence; Alcohol problems; Client treatment matching; Effectiveness; MET; SBNT; Treatment; UKATT

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL ABSTINENCE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL WORK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLISM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TEMPERANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38049185124     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02060.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. UKATT Research Team. United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial: hypotheses, design and methods. Alcohol Alcohol 2001 36 : 11 21.
2. UKATT Research Team. Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). BMJ 2005 331 : 541 4.
3. UKATT Research Team. Cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). BMJ 2005 331 : 544 8.
4. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997 58 : 7 29.
5. Project MATCH Research Group. Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction 1997 92 : 1671 98.
6. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes. Alcohol Exp Clin Res 1998 22 : 1300 11.
7. Copello A. nick.heather@unn.ac.uk, Orford J., Hodgson R., Tober G., Barrett C. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. Social behaviour and network therapy: basic principles and early experiences. Addict Behav 2002 27 : 345 66.
8. Longabaugh R., Wirtz P. W., Zweben A., Stout R. L. Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long-term matching effects. Addiction 1998 93 : 1313 33.
9. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C., Norcross J. C. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviour. Am Psychol 1992 47 : 1102 14.
10. McLellan A., Luborski L., Woody G., O'Brien C., Druley K. Predicting response to alcohol and drug abuse treatments: role of psychiatric severity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983 40 : 620 5.
11. Cooney N., Kadden R., Litt M., Getter H. Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: two year follow-up results. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991 59 : 598 601.
12. Miller W. R., Zweben A., DiClemente C., Rychtarik R. Motivational Enhancement Therapy. A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 2, DHHS Publication no. ADM 92-1894. Washington, DC : Department of Health and Human Services 1992.
13. Schwartz D., Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in clinical trials. J Chronic Dis 1967 20 : 637 48.
14. Flay B. R. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med 1986 15 : 451 74.
15. Clifford P. R., Longabaugh R. Manual for the Administration of the Important People and Activities Instrument. Providence, RI : Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies. Brown University 1991.
16. Moos R., Moos B. Family Environment Scale Manual: Developments, Applications, Research, 3rd edn. Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologist Press 1994.
17. Heather N., Luce A., Peck D., Dunbar B., James I. Development of a treatment version of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire. Addict Res 1999 7 : 63 8.
18. McMahon J., Jones B. The Negative Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire. J Assoc Nurses Subst Abuse 1993 1 : 12 17.
19. Jones B. T., McMahon J. Alcohol motivations as outcome expectancies. In : Miller W. R., Heather N., editors. Treating Addictive Behaviors, 2nd edn. New York : Plenum 1998, p. 75 92.
20. Goldberg D. P. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford : Oxford University Press 1972.
21. McLellan A. T., Luborski L., Woody G. E., O'Brien C. P. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse clients: the Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980 168 : 26 33.
22. Spielberger C. D. Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Scale (STAX). Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. 1988.
23. Raistrick D., Bradshaw J., Tober G., Weiner J., Allison J., Healey C. Development of the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): a questionnaire to measure alcohol and opiate dependence in the context of a treatment evaluation package. Addiction 1994 89 : 563 72.
24. Miller W. R. Form 90: A Structured Assessment Interview for Drinking and Related Behaviors. Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 5. Rockville, MD : National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism 1996.
25. Drummond D. C. The relationship between alcohol dependence and alcohol related problems in a clinical population. Br J Addict 1990 85 : 357 66.
26. Miller W. R., Walters S. T., Bennett M. E. How effective is alcoholism treatment in the United States? J Stud Alcohol 2001 62 : 211 20.
27. Finney J. W., Moos R. H. Matching patients with treatments: conceptual and methodological issues. J Stud Alcohol 1986 47 : 122 34.
28. McClelland G. H., Judd C. M. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychol Bull 1993 114 : 376 90.
29. Moyer A., Finney J. W., Elworth J. T., Kraemer H. C. Can methodological features account for patient-treatment matching findings in the alcohol field? J Stud Alcohol 2001 62 : 62 73.
30. Stout R., Del Boca F. K., Carbonari J., Rychtarik R., Litt M. D., Cooney N. Primary treatment outcomes and matching effects: outpatient arm. In : Babor T., Del Boca F. K., editors. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. IRMA Monograph Series no. 4. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press 2003, p. 105 34.
31. Randall C., del Boca F. K., Mattson M. E., Rychtarik R., Cooney N. L., Donovan D. M. et al. Primary treatment outcomes and matching effects: aftercare arm. In : Babor T.F., Del Boca F. K., editors. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. IRMA Monograph Series no. 4. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press 2003, p. 135 49.
32. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Washington, DC : National Academy Press 1990.
33. Mattson M., Allen J. Research on matching alcoholic patients to treatments: findings, issues and implications. J Addict Dis 1991 11 : 33 49.
34. Lindstrom L. Managing Alcoholism: Matching Clients to Treatment. New York : Oxford University Press 1992.
35. Brown M. J. Matching the right drug to the right patient in essential hypertension. Heart 2001 86 : 113 20.
36. Heather N. Some common methodological criticisms of Project MATCH: are they justified? Addiction 1999 94 : 36 9.
37. Humphreys K., Weingardt K., Horst D., Joshi A., Finney J. Prevalence and predictors of research participant eligibility criteria in alcohol treatment outcome studies. Addiction 2005 100 : 1249 57.
38. Sobell L. C., Sobell M. B. Frequent follow-up as data gathering and continued care with alcoholics. Int J Addict 1981 16 : 1077 86.
39. Ogborne A. C., Annis H. M. The reactive effect of follow-up assessment procedures: an experimental study. Addict Behav 1998 13 : 123 9.
40. Clifford P. R., Maisto S. A. Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol 2000 61 : 787 93.
41. Clifford P. R., Maisto S. A., Franzke L. H., Longabaugh R., Beattie M. C. Alcohol treatment research follow-up interviews and drinking behaviours. J Stud Alcohol 2000 61 : 736 43.
42. Bühringer G. Allocating treatment options to patient profiles: clinical art or science? Addiction 2006 101 : 646 52.
43. McLachlan J. Benefit from group therapy as a function of patient-therapist match on conceptual level. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1972 9 : 317 23.
44. Karno M., Longabaugh R. Does matching matter? Examining matches and mismatches between patient attributes and therapy techniques in alcoholism treatment. Addiction 2007 102 : 587 96.
45. Hall W., Einfeld S. On doing the 'impossible': inferring that a putative causal relationship does not exist. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1990 24 : 217 26.
46. Stiles W. B., Shapiro D. A., Elliott R. Are all psychotherapies equivalent? Am Psychol 1986 41 : 165 80.
47. Beutler L. E. Have all won and must all have prizes? J Consult Clin Psychol 1991 59 : 226 32.
48. Wampold B. E., Mondin G. W., Moody M., Stich F., Benson K., Ahn H. A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: empirically 'all must have prizes'. Psychol Bull 1997 122 : 203 15.
49. Truax C., Carkhuff R. Toward Effective Counselling and Psychotherapy. Chicago : Aldine 1973.
50. Franks J. Persuasion and Healing: A Comparative Study of Psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University Press 1976.
51. Moos R. H. Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug Alc Dependence 2007 88 : 109 21.
52. Cooney N., Babor T., DiClemente C., del Boca F. Clinical and scientific implications of Project MATCH. In : Babor T., Del Boca F., editors. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. IRMA Monograph Series no. 4. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press 2003, p. 222 37.
53. Orford J., Hodgson R., Copello A., John B., Smith M., Black R. et al. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. The client's perspective on change during treatment for an alcohol problem: qualitative analysis of follow-up interviews in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. Addiction 2006 101 : 60 8.
54. Miller W. R., Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd edn. New York : Guilford Press 2002.
55. Burke B. L., Arkowitz H., Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003 71 : 843 61.
56. Wampold B. E. The Great Psychotherapy Debate. Mahway, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum 2001.
57. Finney J. W. Some treatment implications of Project MATCH. Addiction 1999 94 : 42 4.
58. Department of Health. Building on the Best: Choice, Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS. London : Department of Health 2003.
59. Kissin B., Platz A., Su W. H. Social and psychological factors in the treatment of chronic alcoholism. J Psychiatr Res 1970 8 : 13 27.
60. Booth P. G., Dale B., Slade P. D., Dewey M. E. A follow-up study of problem drinkers offered a goal choice option. J Stud Alcohol 1992 53 : 594 600.
61. Ewing J. A. Matching therapy and patients: the cafeteria plan. Br J Addict 1977 72 : 13 18.
62. Miller W. R. Matching individuals with interventions. In : Hester R., Miller W., editors. Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches: Effective Alternatives. Elmsford, NY : Pergamon 1989, p. 261 71.
63. Sackett D. L., Strauss S. E., Richardson W. S., Rosenberg W., Haynes R. B. Evidence Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 2nd edn. London : Churchill Livingstone 2000.
64. Brehm S. S., Brehm J. W. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York : Academic Press 1981.
65. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York : Plenum 1985.
66. Sobell M. B., Sobell L. C. Stepped care as a heuristic approach to the treatment of alcohol problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000 68 : 573 9.
67. Raistrick D., Heather N., Godfrey C. Review of the Effectiveness of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. London : National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse 2006.
68. Tober G., Raistrick D. Motivational Dialogue. London : Routledge 2007.