Allocating treatment options to patient profiles: Clinical art or science?

Addiction

Volumn 101, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 646-652

  Bühringer, Gerhard ^a,b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b IFT INSTITUT FÜR THERAPIEFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Addiction; Patient heterogeneity; Treatment allocation

Indexed keywords

METHADONE;

ADDICTION; ALCOHOLISM; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CANNABIS ADDICTION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEROIN DEPENDENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHADONE TREATMENT; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 33645984252     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01366.x     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) 2001 Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders 2nd edn revised. Chevy Chase ASAM.
2. Babor T. F. Del Boca F. K. eds 2003 Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
3. Blanken P. Hendriks V. M. Koeter M. W. J. van Ree J. M. van den Brink W. 2005 Matching of treatment-resistant heroin-dependent patients to medical prescription of heroin or oral methadone treatment: results from two randomized controlled trials. Addiction 100 89 95.
4. Bühringer G. Kröger C. Küfner H. Lieb R. Schütz C. Soyka M. et al. 2002 Suchtforschungsverbund ASAT: Entwicklung von Zuordnungsmodellen für Interventionen bei Substanzstörungen [Substance abuse research network ASAT: allocating substance abuse treatments to patient heterogeneity]. Sucht 48 200 208.
5. Copello A. Orford J. Hodgson R. Tober G. Barrett C. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team 2002 Social behaviour and network therapy: basic principles and early experiences. Addictive Behaviors 27 345 366.
6. DiClemente C. C. Prochaska J. O. 1998 Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change. Stages of change and addictive behaviours. In Miller W. R. Heather N. eds. Treating Addictive Behaviors pp. 3 24. New York Plenum Press.
7. Edwards G. Orford J. Egert S. Guthrie S. Hawker A. Hensman C. et al. 1977 Alcoholism: a controlled trial of 'treatment' and 'advice'. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 38 1004 1031.
8. Finney J. W. 1999 Some treatment implications of Project MATCH. Addiction 94 42 44.
9. Finney J. W. Hahn A. C. Moos R. H. 1996 The effectiveness of in-patient and out-patient treatment for alcohol abuse: the need to focus on mediators and moderators of setting effects. Addiction 91 1773 1796.
10. Freud S. 1905 Über Psychotherapie [On Psychotherapy]. Gesammelte Werke Band V. Frankfurt Fischer (reprinted 1961).
11. Friedmann P. D. Hendrickson J. C. Gerstein D. R. Zhang Z. 2004 The effect of matching comprehensive services to patients' needs on drug improvement in addiction treatment. Addiction 99 962 972.
12. Galanter M. 1999 Network Therapy for Alcohol and Drug Abuse expanded edn. New York Guilford Press.
13. Gastfriend D. R. ed. 2003 Addiction Treatment Matching: Research Foundations of the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) Criteria. Binghamton Haworth Medical Press.
14. Gastfriend D. R. McLellan A. T. 1997 Treatment matching: theoretical basis and practical implications. Medical Clinics of North America 81 945 966.
15. Gordis E. Fuller F. 1999 Project MATCH. Addiction 94 57 59.
16. Gustafson D. 2005 ASAM PPC. Available at: http://cnx.rice.edu/content/m12683/1.1 [accessed 18 March 2005].
17. Hall W. 1999 Patient matching in treatment for alcohol dependence: is the null hypothesis still alive and well? Addiction 94 52 54.
18. Havemann-Reinecke U. Küfner H. Schneider U. Günthner A. Schalast N. Vollmer H. C. 2004 AWMF-Leitlinien: Postakutbehandlung bei Störungen durch Opioide [AWMF guidelines: postacute treatment of opiate abuse and dependence]. Sucht 50 226 257.
19. Humphreys K. Tucker J. A. 2002 Toward more responsive and effective intervention systems for alcohol-related problems. Addiction 97 126 132.
20. Humphreys K. Weisner C. 2000 Use of exclusion criteria in selecting research subjects and its effect on the generalizability of alcohol treatment outcome studies. American Journal of Psychiatry 157 588 594.
21. Konsanke N. Magura S. Staines G. Footes J. DeLuca A. 2002 Feasibility of matching alcohol patients to ASAM levels of care. American Journal on Addictions 11 124 134.
22. Kröger C. Metz K. Bühler A. 2004 Tabakentwöhnung bei Patienten in Rehabilitationskliniken [Smoking cessation in patients treated in rehabilitation hospitals]. Suchtmedizin in Forschung und Praxis 6 61 66.
23. Küfner H. Hackmann K. Schnabel A. Soyka M. 2004 Optimierung der substitutionsgestützten Therapie Drogenabhängiger (OSTD): Entzugssymptome und Suchtverlangen in der ersten Einstellungswoche [Optimizing maintenance therapy for drug dependants (OSTD): withdrawal symptoms and craving in the first week of medication]. Suchtmedizin in Forschung und Praxis 6 95 97.
24. Lindström L. 1999 Life is short, the Art long. Addiction 94 45 46.
25. Longabaugh R. Wirtz P. W. eds 2001 Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and Causal Chain Analyses. Project MATCH monograph series, 8. Bethesda National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
26. Magura S. Staines G. Kosanke N. Rosenblum A. Foote J. DeLuca A. et al. 2003 Predictive validity of the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for naturalistic matched versus mismatched alcoholism patients. American Journal on Additions 12 386 397.
27. Mattson M. E. Allen J. P. Longabaugh R. Nickless C. J. Connors G. J. Kadden R. M. 1994 A chronological review of empirical studies matching alcoholic clients to treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 12 16 29.
28. McKay J. R. Cacciola J. S. McLellan A. T. Alterman A. I. Wirtz P. W. 1997 An initial evaluation of the psychosocial dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine criteria for in-patient versus intensive out-patient substance abuse rehabilitation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 58 239 252.
29. McLellan A. T. Grissom G. R. Brill P. Metzger D. S. O'Brien C. P. 1993 Substance abuse treatment in the private setting: are some programs more effective than others? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 10 243 254.
30. McLellan A. T. McKay J. R. Forman R. Cacciola J. Kemp J. 2005 Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction 100 447 458.
31. Miller W. R. Cooney N. L. 1994 Designing studies to investigate client-treatment matching. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 12 38 45.
32. Miller W. R. Hester R. K. 1986 The effectiveness of alcoholism treatment methods: what research reveals. In Miller W. R. Heather N. eds. Treating Addictive Behaviours: Processes of Change pp. 121 174. New York Plenum Press.
33. Miller W. R. Wilbourne P. L. 2002 Mesa Grande: a methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders. Addiction 97 265 277.
34. Monahan S. C. Finney J. W. 1996 Explaining abstinence rates following treatment for alcohol abuse: a quantitative synthesis of patient, research design and treatment effects. Addiction 91 787 805.
35. Negrete J. C. 1999 A contrast in treatment philosophies. Addiction 94 59 62.
36. Orford J. 1999 Future research directions: a commentary on Project MATCH. Addiction 94 62 66.
37. Paul G. L. 1967 Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology 31 109 118.
38. Project MATCH Research Group 1997a Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction 92 1671 1698.
39. Project MATCH Research Group 1997b Matching alcohol treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 58 7 29.
40. Project MATCH Research Group 1998 Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 59 631 639.
41. San L. 1999 Future directions and the impact of the MATCH project on research technology in the addictions. Addiction 94 55 57.
42. Simpson D. 2001 Modelling treatment process and outcomes. Addiction 96 207 211.
43. Sobell M. B. Sobell L. C. 1999 Stepped care for alcohol problems: an efficient method for planning and delivering clinical services. In Tucker J. A. Donovan D. M. Marlatt G. A. eds. Changing Addictive Behavior. Bridging Clinical and Public Health Strategies pp. 331 343. New York Guilford Press.
44. Sonntag D. Künzel J. 2000 Hat die Therapiedauer bei alkohol- und drogenabhängigen Patienten einen positiven Einfluss auf den Therapieerfolg? [Does time in treatment have a positive effect on treatment outcome for alcohol and drug dependants?]. SUCHT 46.
45. Steinberg K. L. Roffman R. A. Carroll K. M. Kabela E. Kadden R. Miller M. et al. and the Marijuana Treatment Project Research Group 2002 Tailoring cannabis dependence treatment for a diverse population. Addiction 97 135 142.
46. Süß H.-M. 1995 Zur Wirksamkeit der Therapie bei Alkoholabhängigen: Ergebnisse einer Meta-Analyse [Treatment effectiveness for alcohol dependants: results of a meta-analysis]. Psychologische Rundschau 46 248 266.
47. Sutton S. 1999 Project MATCH and the stages of change. Addiction 94 47 48.
48. West R. 2005 Time for a change: putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest. Addiction 100 1036 1039.
49. Zimmermann P. Mühlig S. Sonntag D. Bühringer G. Wittchen H.-U. 2004 Review on psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis disorders. Sucht 50 334 342.