Towards an extensible argumentation system

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4724 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 283-294

  Wyner, Adam Z ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; FEATURE EXTRACTION; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

ARGUMENTATION; INTER AGENT DIALOGUES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 38049112991     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-358 (1995)
2. Bochman, A.: Collective argumentatioin and disjunctive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 405-428 (2003)
3. Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Coherence in finite argument systems. Artif. Intell. 141(1), 187-203 (2002)
4. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-98), pp. 1-7. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)
5. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429-448 (2003)
6. Gordon, T., Walton, D.: The carneades argumentation framework: Using presumptions and exceptions to model critical questions. In: Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T. (eds.) Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, pp. 195-207. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
7. Bench-Capon, T., Doutre, S., Dunne, P.E.: Audiences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 171, 42-71 (2007)
8. Prakken, H.: Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. In: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)
9. Governatori, G., Maher, M.J., Antoniu, G., Billington, D.: Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic. Journal of Logic and Computation 14(5), 675-702 (2004)
10. Atkinson, K.: What Should We Do?: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom (2005)
11. Cayrol, C., Devred, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems. In: Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J. (eds.) Computational Models of Argument, pp. 261-272. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
12. Karttunen, L.: Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1), 3-44 (1977)